Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Fri Apr 23, 2021 12:41

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jan 20, 2011 12:15 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 02:17
Posts: 7361
Location: Highlands
Press : Express and Star here, article here.

Topic : Cameras - Only 34 of the 263 cameras will be in use, but on a rotational basis so motorists will not know which one's will be in use- Staffordshire

Journalist : Dan Wainwright

Date : 20 Jan 2011

Other local Camera Stories :
14.1.11 - 10 Cameras snare more than 10,000 speeders
http://www.expressandstar.com/news/2011 ... -speeders/

13.1.11 - Speed cameras axed after spending cuts
http://www.expressandstar.com/news/2011 ... ding-cuts/

10.01.11 - Flashing signs to be rolled out in bid to cut speeds
http://www.expressandstar.com/news/2011 ... ut-speeds/

_________________
Safe Speed for Intelligent Road Safety through proper research, experience & guidance.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 15:09 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 16:51
Posts: 1323
Location: Stafford - a short distance past hope
The word "on the ground" is that rotation will geologically rapid rather than "fast spin"... (There's no evidence of them ever rotating anything actually)

_________________
I won't slave for beggar's pay,
likewise gold and jewels,
but I would slave to learn the way
to sink your ship of fools


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 15:30 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
By this logic, they don't actually need any cameras...

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 15:46 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6735
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
malcolmw wrote:
By this logic, they don't actually need any cameras...

Well, they only need one camera.

If it was known that they had no active cameras at all, the housings could be safely ignored.

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 17:30 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 02:17
Posts: 7361
Location: Highlands
And hence too why so many do not wish to comply with Gov and print their camera / ticket results!

To rely on paranoia as a road safety policy shows just how badly they understand road safety.

_________________
Safe Speed for Intelligent Road Safety through proper research, experience & guidance.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.037s | 14 Queries | GZIP : Off ]