DoktorMandrake wrote:
So would I, but campaigns take time and the outcome is not guaranteed. It can seem like the governments are only interested in one side of the argument. So I understand why people take direct action. In reality everyone who disagrees with speed cameras should stand up and be counted. That would have a massive impact but I think a lot of people just accept them as part of the landscape. Which is sad.
I can understand the frustration felt and the desire of the demise of speed cameras.
Until we have asked the questions and obtained answers (or not) we really cannot assume what things might be, but help to ensure that our voice is heard in all the right authoritative quarters, so that the right decisions or questions may be asked or queried. Without ensuring that this happens it is not good moaning later when another bad decision has been made.
Trying to get many to stand up is a very hard task. Just finding the right approach is tough. Do you give the opportunity to give funds or action or a voice and then how ? What appeals to the 'public' what do they want to do or will at least consider ?