Mole wrote:
If it's velcroed to the dash, it's not hand-held, so what's the problem?
I don't think it is a problem Mole, but after what happened to my friend/neighbour you never know.
"What happened?"The one about he was at a pub and had more than he knew he should have had to drive back so he called his wife to pick him up. Since it was raining he sat in the car, keys
not in the ignition.
It didn't matter, he was charged with DD even though he could prove his intentions. Similar thing happened to another work colleague and friend many years ago.
"What happened this time?"I did post it here on SS. He wanted to listen to his music, (boom boom sort), but his mum didn't like that in the house. (Can't say I blame her). So he went in the car with his can of lager to listen to it. Now then, you may say he deserved it, but you had to have the keys in the ignition in order for the player to work. Didn't matter, he got done for DD even though it was obvious to an ape what his intentions were. He said, "if you don't believe me feel the car engine! I haven't been anywhere and I DO NOT intend to go anywhere".
He was so enraged and indignant about it he fought, and lost, in court.
You can’t trust a jobsworth...
Mole wrote:
On a more serious note, of course that's terrible behaviour. The thing is, will they create a specific offence (playing a games console while driving) or would they (if they caught him) not just do him for "without due car & attention"? If so, why did we need a specific mobile law? If not, will we need a specific law for every possible distraction?
Or, for that matter, why not just have an umbrella term "without due care & attention" for drink driving, speeding, running a red light etc. ?
