IanH wrote:
Cumbria Police is committed to and always has a specific number of traffic cars with responsibility for motorway cover 24 hours a day. This does not necessarily mean that they will always be on the motorway, but they will be able to respond whenever required.
More or less the same over here. We deploy so tht the lads can respond asquickly as required. Think you'll find full quotas on the roads here 24/7.
Like Ian - we will probably target problem areas proportionately. We all have our "nightmare patches".
Ian wrote:
Regarding TPaC, it would be wrong of me to detail too much of our planning and technique, but much of the emphasis is placed on directing the subject to where we want him to be - fleeing drivers usually drive instinctively with little or no plan. We try to lure them into our trap if we can. Doesn't always work, but it's an excellent technique when it does, and the safety of the public is prime consideration throughout.
Yes - it works well. Especially if managed correctly - and lot of effort goes into ensuring MoP safety and our own safety - we have to consider the safety of our villain too. After all - we want to chuck away the key later on!
Quote:
Nuffers'Nuff wrote:
A lot of negative stuff
I'd like to be able to offer you some reassurances about our aims and intentions, but often when your mind is made up by a combination of negative personal experiences bolstered by others' often blinkered anecdote, it is very very difficult to turn that around.
True, Ian. We get some of the fall out here - where people tell us to cop "real criminals."

We even had a kid caught red handed
cycling away from his burglary tell us this

Lads here almost choked n their doughnuts over that....

Especially when he allegedly told the Bib who collared him to go cop the speeding motorist who "nearly had him off his bike!"

But "Nuffers" - who are you angry with? BiB of a scam partnership - could have been police operating the speed gun - but some are using civvies. Were you pinged by a tempo Gatso in those road works?
For record - we would have tugged here over 58 mph in 50 mph tempo zone. As it would be 10% +3 - it would probably have been a firm chat over dangers of road works. If it was a 40 mph tempo - then we would prosecute.
We do not go around nit-picking.
Ian wrote:
However, PCs are not on performance related commision, so we do not give a second's thought to the cash calculator when reporting someone for an offence.
True - we don't. Never ever crossed my mind. It is always: "How dangerous is this person to the public and himself if we let him continue!"
Best way of dealing with it has always been with firm, but polite attitude. Of course they will grumble - no-one likes being copped doing something they should not be doing. We all hated it when we were kids - and I don't think we really grow out of it either. Also - most like to retain an umblemished reputation - especially regarding driving licences.
Ian wrote:
No matter - I've got broad shoulders.
You need this
and a thick skin.
Fortunately - I grew up knowing those Swiss "rebels"
Ian wrote:
But if issuing a fixed penalty ticket to someone for not wearing a seatbelt, or to someone for not heeding a previous warning about fog lights generates feelings of resentment like those expressed by EnoughsEnough, there's little doubt we're losing our effectiveness to change motorists' attitudes.
I believe the next 5 years will be significant in respect of public respect for police and the law. Our managers need to recognise and work hard at trying to rebuild that sense of respect with a combination of well trained trafpol (and all other Bib of course) and enforcement proportionate to risk or level of criminality.
Trouble is, Ian, we are now facing positive discrimination in recruitment policy. Of course, we need a cosmopolitan Force to match the society it is policing. But we need folks who can actually
do and be trained to do the job. That's what public and ourselves expect. Don't care about gender, sexua leaning, creed or colour - we just want competnt lads and lasses who can be trained to do the job - and we'd rather have properly trained staff than hundreds of CSOs - who can be very useful if deployed properly - but are no substitute for a properly trained and committed BiB.
We are also facing cutbacks in training: shortened courses and fewer or shorter in-service "refreshers and developers." That is something which needs addressing.
Ian wrote:
In Gear's force's stance is not aided by national policy which unfortunately dwarfs most of the beneficial effect of the lone voice of reason.
We get hammered over the least thing because of the outspoken

reputation here.
As stated, we get the fall-out over the dafter policies gripping the country as well.
But - stats speak for themselves. Not just constant "decently competent" performance in Traffic - we ain't that bad at the other stuff - catching proper criminals ...
Come to Durham - "Nuffers" .... we'll have your attitude banged back to rights 'ere!
