Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sat Jul 04, 2026 10:13

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 09:56 
Offline
Banned
Banned

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 12:47
Posts: 2291
SafeSpeed wrote:
Why is it dot sig anyway? Is it an allusion to a dos 8.3 filename extension?


.sig comes from a time when each UNIX user had, in thier home dir, a file called .sig that had thier .sig in it. A .sig is a sign-off line about yourself. The .filename convention hides files in a dir, so they don't show up in a standard "ls" command. You might have dozens of .filename files in your home dir. It is a thing which has stuck in netiquette.

Do you use Linux to host your forums?

_________________
I stole this .sig


Last edited by basingwerk on Fri Jul 08, 2005 10:05, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 10:04 
Offline
Banned
Banned

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 12:47
Posts: 2291
Sixy_the_red wrote:
These things happen, that's why they're called accidents, and no amount of maintenance can prevent it :P.


That's true - it is partly random. The only thing you can do to mitigate randomness is keep the speed down to a reasonable level. A mechanical disaster that would kill you at 90 mph might be manageable at, say, 60 mph. Having said that, fatalities due to mechanical failure are rare.

_________________
I stole this .sig


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 22:37 
Offline
Police Officer and Member
Police Officer and Member

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 22:53
Posts: 565
Location: Kendal
PaulF wrote:
Discretion

I'm going to give 3 true stories involving me as a youngster regarding brakes and am after the views of the BiB regarding discretion (yes, what I am about to admit to was {and still is} strictly speaking illegal - but I'd like to know what they'd do (as in nicking or ignoring-wise and why).

1 As a motorcyclist (and about 19 years old at the time) the cable on the front brake snapped as I applied the brakes to stop at a zebra crossing. At the moment the front brake failed through the cable breaking, I locked the back wheel (through reflex, I suppose) but managed to miss the pedestrian on the crossing. The bike was properly maintained and the cable was oiled and adjusted periodically as per the handbook.

Question 1a. Considering no-one was hurt (and remember the police weren't actually called), if you (the BiB) had been called or had witnessed and stopped; would you have nicked me there and then for defective brakes? Q 1b. I rode the bike home slowly, literally no more than 20MPH on side streets off of the main thoroughfairs (about 7 miles) relying on the back brake only: If you'd seen and stopped me doing this, in light of the story, would you have nicked me?

2 Again, as a motorcyclist, "2-up" (the girlfriend), when I was around 25, I took my CX 500 down the A13 towards the 'magic roundabout' at Pitsea. On applying the brakes, the rear brake hub stay arm snapped, pulled the back brake on violently on its own momentarily locking the back whheel before the whole back brake pedal assemble was torn off the bike. (the pedal actually thumped me heavily across the back of the right leg having done a revolution as the wheel unlocked itself). I brought the bike to a halt on the front brake only by just braking marginally harder than I would have done anyway and over use of downshifting (ie high revving the engine on the over-run). The girl frind was oblivious to what had happened until she saw the bruise on the back of my calf and the wrapped around back brake arm. Questions are the same as above. The bike was properly maintained (by me - and I am not an idiot, bikers who knowingly ride defective machines as though they weren't defective don't have a long life expectancy!). Q2a Had you come across me examining the bike and limping, would you have nicked me there and then or exercised discretion? Q2b. I put the girlfriend on the train and rode the bike home some 30 miles. 40MPH ish on the A13 dual carriageway, 20MPH ish on the back-streets just as soon as I could practicably get of the main road and use them: If you'd seen me riding so slowly and had the explanation that I was riding the bike straight home very cautiously given the circumstances, would you have nicked me?

I always did all my motorcycle maintainance myself.

3 Not as dramatic: The handbrake cable snapped in the car about 5 years ago. Having investigated and made sure that no lose part of the cable would foul the wheels, likewise, I drove the car home and then onto a garage to get it fixed. Q3a & 3b are the same as above. Would you nick at the time or en-route home? I will add that I did not drive the car quite as cautiuously as the bikes at all when 'limping' home.

Whilst I expect to be told I should have been shot by an unspoken few, I wonder what the opinions are not just of the BiB but others too. I would add that in the event I had NO brakes at all, I would not move any vehicle (car or bike or anything else) - nor would I drive a car on the handbrake alone except for the shortest of distances (like off of a recovery truck and onto the drive and into the garage at 5 mph).

My own views are that I would do exactly the same again given the circumstances (as in drive very slowly and off the beaten track, 'nursing' whatever it was I was driving / riding home). Does anyone else have any view on this Or should I have been shot for doing so?


Wouldn't touch you for any of these Paul. Probably stop to check what's happened, and offer some advice if needed.

Quote:
2 Again, as a motorcyclist, "2-up" (the girlfriend), when I was around 25

Don't even think that's an offence mate, although I prefer to keep my girl to myself. :hehe:

_________________
Fixed ideas are like cramp, for instance in the foot, yet the best remedy is to step on them.

Ian


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 23:26 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2005 14:00
Posts: 1271
Location: Near Telford, UK / Barcelona, Spain
IanH wrote:
PaulF wrote:
.. Again, as a motorcyclist, "2-up" (the girlfriend), when I was around 25

Don't even think that's an offence mate, although I prefer to keep my girl to myself. :hehe:

You're a dirty wee devil, and you'll never go to Heaven!! :)

_________________
"Politicians are the same the world over... We build bridges where there aren't any rivers." - Nikita Kruschev


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 00:11 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 23:42
Posts: 3820
PaulF wrote:
Discretion

I'm going to give 3 true stories involving me as a youngster regarding brakes and am after the views of the BiB regarding discretion (yes, what I am about to admit to was {and still is} strictly speaking illegal - but I'd like to know what they'd do (as in nicking or ignoring-wise and why).

1 As a motorcyclist (and about 19 years old at the time) the cable on the front brake snapped as I applied the brakes to stop at a zebra crossing. At the moment the front brake failed through the cable breaking, I locked the back wheel (through reflex, I suppose) but managed to miss the pedestrian on the crossing. The bike was properly maintained and the cable was oiled and adjusted periodically as per the handbook.

Question 1a. Considering no-one was hurt (and remember the police weren't actually called), if you (the BiB) had been called or had witnessed and stopped; would you have nicked me there and then for defective brakes? Q 1b. I rode the bike home slowly, literally no more than 20MPH on side streets off of the main thoroughfairs (about 7 miles) relying on the back brake only: If you'd seen and stopped me doing this, in light of the story, would you have nicked me?


Nope. Would probably have offered some assistance though. May even have escorted dependent on how busy...depends. But would have offered some constructive advice based on what was seen to help you limp home safely. Lads here have been known to escort to nearest garage if too far or too dangerous. But we are not in business of nicking people for the sake of it.


PaulF wrote:
2 Again, as a motorcyclist, "2-up" (the girlfriend), when I was around 25, I took my CX 500 down the A13 towards the 'magic roundabout' at Pitsea. On applying the brakes, the rear brake hub stay arm snapped, pulled the back brake on violently on its own momentarily locking the back whheel before the whole back brake pedal assemble was torn off the bike. (the pedal actually thumped me heavily across the back of the right leg having done a revolution as the wheel unlocked itself). I brought the bike to a halt on the front brake only by just braking marginally harder than I would have done anyway and over use of downshifting (ie high revving the engine on the over-run). The girl frind was oblivious to what had happened until she saw the bruise on the back of my calf and the wrapped around back brake arm. Questions are the same as above. The bike was properly maintained (by me - and I am not an idiot, bikers who knowingly ride defective machines as though they weren't defective don't have a long life expectancy!). Q2a Had you come across me examining the bike and limping, would you have nicked me there and then or exercised discretion? Q2b. I put the girlfriend on the train and rode the bike home some 30 miles. 40MPH ish on the A13 dual carriageway, 20MPH ish on the back-streets just as soon as I could practicably get of the main road and use them: If you'd seen me riding so slowly and had the explanation that I was riding the bike straight home very cautiously given the circumstances, would you have nicked me?


Again probably not - unless really bad...but again would have offered whatever assistance permitted under circumstances. May have kept eye on you for as long as reasonably possible as well.. May have issued with a defective notice - but that mean you have to prove the work has been completed within the 7 days ... but would depend as to how bad defect was judged to be, :wink:

[qupte="PaulF"]
I always did all my motorcycle maintainance myself.[/quote]

I tinker with the old cars and bikes. Currently rebuilding an MG. During student days - used to drive my mother to point of insanity as was always messing in the garage and the front lawn was littered with bits from bikes and bits from cars. I once went a bit manic with a spray gun... Ma's white roses ended up a rather strange blue colour as I'd let the pressure build up a bit ... and the lawn and roses took the full blast. :lol: :lol:

PaullF wrote:
3 Not as dramatic: The handbrake cable snapped in the car about 5 years ago. Having investigated and made sure that no lose part of the cable would foul the wheels, likewise, I drove the car home and then onto a garage to get it fixed. Q3a & 3b are the same as above. Would you nick at the time or en-route home? I will add that I did not drive the car quite as cautiuously as the bikes at all when 'limping' home.


Nope - I 've driven a car to a garage with a snapped handbrake. :shock: I've driven police cars to garages with snapped handbrakes :shock: :? :shock:

_________________
Take with a chuckle or a grain of salt
Drive without COAST and it's all your own fault!

A SMILE is a curve that sets everything straight (P Diller).

A Smiley Per post
FINES USfor our COAST!


Approach love and cooking with reckless abandon - but driving with a smile and a COAST calm mind.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 00:56 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 00:15
Posts: 5232
Location: Windermere
JJ wrote:
JT wrote:
Strangely enough, I can recall no specific advice being offered by the highway code in terms of dealing with this scenario... :lol:

"6. Vehicle maintainance, safety and security

Vehicle maintenance

Take special care that lights, brakes, steering, exhaust system, seat belts, demisters, wipers and washers are all working."

The Highway Code is written and produced to prevent such circumstances. All it takes is a read and a little comprehension and it works well. :roll:

I think you misunderstood JT's comment.
He was'nt questioning whether the Highway Code covered maintenance of vehicle, it was the matter of self preservation of personal equipment...
Quote:
At which point said right hand neatly flicks the cigarette out of my mouth to land in my lap in a shower of glowing embers.

Interesting point - are there any statistics to show how many accidents are caused by lit cigarettes in cars? I know a case of a motorcyclist who was struck by a cigarette end flicked from a window of a passing car, who swerved off the road onto the verge, thinking it was lodged in his clothing. :(

_________________
Time to take responsibility for our actions.. and don't be afraid of speaking out!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2005 21:04 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 22:21
Posts: 925
Having never ridden a motobike I don't feel qualified enough to comment on your above incidents. The way I look at is to think about how much the likelyhood of an accident is increased, taking into account the fact that your driving slowly and carefully. If the likelyhood of an an accident is raised any more then theoretically then I personally would not take the risk. I would also think that if I were to have an accident when I had a knowing defect with my vehicle - how would that look in court? If I was confidant that the defect would have no bearing on the outcome of an accident then I would drive. If it could have an effect then I would not drive.

A couple of years ago, locally to me a driver of a wagon knew he had defective brakes which while working, were only giving a fraction of the braking effort normally applied. He was following a bus which stopped, he swerved round as he could not stop and tragically knocked down and killed a young boy crossing while the traffic should have been stopped on red. He was jailed, and rightly so IMO.

Again, I'm not commenting on your particular incidents, if you felt confidant that an accident was no more likely then if you had no defect taking into account your reduced speed then I think it's fine to carry on.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Wagons
PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2005 23:33 
edited


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.031s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]