Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Fri Nov 14, 2025 00:00

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 46 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2005 12:49 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 15:43
Posts: 2416
Someone I know has been repeatedly denied planning permission to develop a plot of land, one of the excuses, er I mean reasons :wink: was that the Highways Agency would object to it on the grounds of visibility. Probably crap (it's a long story) but if it is true you have to wonder how they've got the gall to come up with that while they're deliberately obscuring traffic on main roads. Anyone got something like this nearby?
Image
This one isn't local to me, though we have one not unlike it fairly close. This is actually in Wiltshire, and anyone who did the A303 trip to the West Country this bank holiday weekend will recognise it despite the slightly blurred pics.

This is the view approaching the roundabout from the west:
Image

Doesn't look too bad, but once you get close to the roundabout, just at the point when you really want to have a good look out for what traffic may already be on it and where you might fit in a gap (or not) this is what you see:
Image

We've talked before on these forums about being prepared to stop but planning to go when approaching roundabouts, but the clowns that came up with the idea of preventing you seeing whether its safe clearly have one aim in mind - to make nearly everyone stop. It's often possible for a half decent to see where a gap will appear on a roundabout and adjust speed to slot into it safely. But if a driver can see there is no such gap they're not going to go, so what's with the fencing?

_________________
Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler - Einstein


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2005 12:57 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
I think we need to put in an FoI to find out how this scheme is justified.

We need to decide first if it's Highwys Agency or Local Authority. If it's LA, then someone local should do it. If it's HA then I'd be proud to do it.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2005 13:01 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 13:54
Posts: 134
Location: Hemel Hempstead -
Thats ridiculous, probably dreamt up by some anti car nutcase! :roll:

I'd like to meet the guy that thought up that idea, because in most cases, the people who make life difficult for drivers are left wingers. One of the other big issues with lefties is environmental issues, so I'd have a field day telling this iddiot that not only has he caused more danger on an approach to a junction, he's caused a tree to be uneccessarily cut down! :twisted:

_________________
www.clubrwd.com - For all things rear wheel drive


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2005 13:08 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 08:22
Posts: 2618
Surprise surprise that's in Wiltshire...There is a roundabout in Swindon that I have to cross most days that has some nice pretty landscaping in the middle of it that prevents you from seeing anything around the other side of it - problem is that the roundabout's so small that you can't see far enough round it to see if its clear to proceed...

_________________
Science won over religion when they started installing lightning rods on churches.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2005 13:27 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
Giving them the benefit of the doubt, this may be a scheme to stop headlights of cars on the roundabout dazzling those approaching.

More realistically, it's almost certainly a scheme to make people slow down as they can't see anything. If you have a low car then quite often the Armco or chevron signs obscure your view approaching roundabouts.

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2005 13:33 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Got one roundabout where the County Council announced that "in the interests of road safety" mounds of earth would be placed on both sides just before the junction.The explanation was to make sure all drivers stopped at the "Give way " signs before the roundabout as they had had a lot of tail enders when some cars stopped to see if the road was clear whilst other drivers could see that nothing was coming/they could safelyperform the manoevre but the car in front stopped suddenly.
A bit more educationto both sorts of drivers might have paid dividents me thinks.
Now at rush hour we have Qs (big uns) at this roundabout with cars stopping , whereas in the past it was possible to be first in line and adjust your speed to pass safely without stopping.
Another bit of blind reading of the rules.
Before someone says "you should stop " - I say why - 1) it's a give way 2) if i approach at a sensibile speed i have the option to accererate or stop ( part of a well known bib COAST rules - NO)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2005 13:58 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 15:43
Posts: 2416
SafeSpeed wrote:
I think we need to put in an FoI to find out how this scheme is justified.

We need to decide first if it's Highwys Agency or Local Authority. If it's LA, then someone local should do it. If it's HA then I'd be proud to do it.

It's a dualled section of the A303, so I suspect probably HA though I'm not certain of this. I'll have a look round the HA site, but unfortunately i can't remember exactly where the damn thing is. :oops:

(Edit: the roundabout, not the HA website :mrgreen: )

_________________
Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler - Einstein


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2005 14:52 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 15:43
Posts: 2416
Okay, I think I've got it. It's the Countess Roundabout where the A303 crosses the A345. Link.

I'm not sure how to tell if the HA are responsible for this junction or not.

_________________
Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler - Einstein


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2005 14:57 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 01:53
Posts: 52
The HA are responsible for all trunk roads in England, so if it's on the A303 (which is a trunk road) then the HA should have been responsible for it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2005 14:59 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Gatsobait wrote:
Okay, I think I've got it. It's the Countess Roundabout where the A303 crosses the A345. Link.

I'm not sure how to tell if the HA are responsible for this junction or not.


I guess someone needs to ring up the LA and ask. Someone local would be best... (And I'm very busy... :hehe: )

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2005 15:07 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 15:43
Posts: 2416
Well, I'm hardly local being at least an hour east of there, but I take the hint :) . I'll see if I can find out which LA it would be in, but having just checked the HA website I found a nice big map at the bottom of this page showing all the HA roads... and like RichardB says, it's an HA road. Still, is it possible that it was put up at the LA's request, or that they told the HA they wanted it and were told to go ahead?

BTW, I've been googling to see if I could find out more, and bizarrely this is supposed to be turned into a grade separated junction as part of the Stonehenge road improvement scheme. Sounds like a good idea to me, but WTH do this fencing business in the meantime? :banghead:

_________________
Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler - Einstein


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2005 15:19 
Offline
Former Police Officer
Former Police Officer
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 00:27
Posts: 351
We have these now local to Basingstoke, I'll give our LA a call and find out who's responsibility they are.

_________________
Former Military Police Officer and accident investigator


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2005 15:30 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 15:43
Posts: 2416
Countess Roundabout is mentioned right at the bottom of this page and the dates are about right (the fencing appeared last year) but I don't know if it's got anything to do with it. No links, no proper name in the address bar, just an IP address. Anyone know how to find out who/what is using a particular IP?

_________________
Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler - Einstein


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2005 15:47 
Offline
Former Police Officer
Former Police Officer
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 00:27
Posts: 351
OK had a good chat with Hampshire County Council "Engineering Consulting Department" formerly known as the Safety Engineering Team.

These fences were errected a bout a year ago as I recall it, I spoke with the engineer who led the project. There were 10-12 ( :?: ) injury accidents at the roundabout above the M3 (Junction 5) involving side swipes and rear end shunts in a 3 year period.

The fences were errected to force traffic to slow down as it approaches and since they were errected there have been 2 injury accidents (they told me they have been up for 2 years but I think its only a year).

At the same time they put the fences there they also put anti skid surface down and also increased the give way signage.

This was a county scheme and they were contacted a few months ago by Swindon to ask whether this had been successful as Wiltshire were considering the same approach on some of their roundabouts.

The engineer who led the project is called Mick Barrett contact number is via Hant council switchboard 01962 2870500.

Not a formal enquiry but he was very pleased to be talking about it (I got a feeling that it was his baby)

_________________
Former Military Police Officer and accident investigator


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2005 15:52 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 16:12
Posts: 1040
Location: West Midlands
Wiltshire County Council

http://www.ripe.net/whois?form_type=simple&full_query_string=&searchtext=195.110.176.50&do_search=Search

There are sites out there that will reveal the registration information about IP addresses effectively duplicating the UNIX "whois" network command.

Another useful technique and one that works with this site is to truncate the address, so the following reveals all:

http://195.110.176.50/documents/


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2005 15:56 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 02:50
Posts: 2868
Location: Dorset
Gatsobait wrote:
Countess Roundabout is mentioned right at the bottom of this page and the dates are about right (the fencing appeared last year) but I don't know if it's got anything to do with it. No links, no proper name in the address bar, just an IP address. Anyone know how to find out who/what is using a particular IP?


You got me enthused to find out :)

DNS Stuff have lots of nice tools... First I tried a reverse DNS but it doesn't have a reverse DNS entry. The most useful information I found was from doing an IPWHOIS query:

http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/whois.ch?ip=195.110.176.50

Looks like it's Wiltshire County Council.

_________________
Andrew.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2005 16:01 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 02:50
Posts: 2868
Location: Dorset
Rewolf wrote:
Wiltshire County Council


Oh you beat me to it!

I didn't know it was as simple as just doing a whois on the IP address :|

And if you go to http://195.110.176.50/ it redirects you to their main web site :)

_________________
Andrew.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2005 16:06 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 16:12
Posts: 1040
Location: West Midlands
Responding to Patch:

The problem with introducing a wide range of measures at one time is that you cannot measure the effectiveness of each measure alone.

For example by introducing the high-grip surfaces alone or the additional signage alone the side swipes might have reduced to zero, and the reduced visibility boards might have been a contributory factor in the accidents that they still have.

Ideally you get 7 similar roundabouts with similar rates and try each possible combination (3 x 1 each, 3 x 2 each and 1 x all three) to determine which mechanism works best.

What I still find astounding is the way our local government appears to be organised for maximum cost and duplication. West Sussex have a team and labs for looking at road surfaces and other road safety measures, so do Hampshire, and East Sussex, and Surrey, and Kent, and Wiltshire, and .... OK there might be minor local differences, but is there not a better way of organising things?

Oh I forgot, we need to have at least 30% of the population working in the public sector because that way they won't notice that there are no productive jobs left.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2005 16:14 
Offline
Former Police Officer
Former Police Officer
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 00:27
Posts: 351
Rewolf wrote:
Responding to Patch:

The problem with introducing a wide range of measures at one time is that you cannot measure the effectiveness of each measure alone.

For example by introducing the high-grip surfaces alone or the additional signage alone the side swipes might have reduced to zero, and the reduced visibility boards might have been a contributory factor in the accidents that they still have.



Er yeah I know that trouble is the engineering consulting (formerly the safety engineering team) don't

_________________
Former Military Police Officer and accident investigator


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2005 17:02 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 15:43
Posts: 2416
Thanks all about the IP question. I'd actually stumbled across the same page by accident while browsing through the Wilts website. Trust me to do it the hard way. :oops: So that page suggests Wilts Council did something to the Countess Roundabout, or at least were aware that something was done. But I also found a whole ten(ish) pages on the HA site called the A303 Route Management Strategy March 2004. Load of waffle basically, but does specifically mention the Countess Roundabout. Emails to both I think.

_________________
Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler - Einstein


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 46 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 117 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.056s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]