"MEN" leader says:
Comment wrote:
None of us take too kindly to being flashed by camera [/i]
bit of an understatement there!
Quote:
But the actions of Mr & Mrs B take a new meaning to cutting off your nose to spite your face. Collecting two £60 fines, the couple concocted an elaborate get-out by inventing Mr Koscov - a Bulgarian "employee" who got flashed in their car before disappearing to Bulgaria. Mrs B even flew to Bulgaria to send her husband a postcard from Mr K to show to the police....
This preposterous story ended with Mr B receiving a £7500 fine and £700 costs and his wife £1750 and £1250 costs... Having misled police and attempting to outsmart the system - they only avoided prison by pleading guilty to perverting the course of justice.
[i] The next comment is quite an interesting comment on the part of the editor despite his condemnation of this couple
Quote:
The case does remind us that the speed camera generally proves that the car, rather than a dirver, commits the offence and theat the registered keeper has to either admit the offence or name the person who did so.

Some argue that this undermines the long established princiciples of English justice. It also invites the possibilty of pulling a fast one by the unscrupulous!

by claiming someone else was driving.
He also forgot to mention that if the driver or car was uninsured, without MOT or even not registered - there is a problem

of potential danger "getting aways with a worse and potentially more dangerous offence should there be a collision.
Quote:
The Bs tried it on and failed . Even the harshest critic of the speed camera will not have much sympathy
SO - what does the borad on here think then?
I do not know what fines this couple may have had already Arguably either could have accepted 3 points each and the £60 fine and given the company car aspect - their loading would have been a high business one anyways.
I do know that when I paid for this 10p edition of the Friday paper at the kiosk in down in Lancs on the way home tonight and passed a remark on the headline - the comment around from 12 people queuing and the three assistants was: "Don't blame them - too easy to lose your licence on one journey these days."
Is this just the attitude of a belaguered LanCASH£re or is it a sign thaat the public "support" assuming they had any is starting to wear thinner than ever?
Is this editor toeing a party line in his final comment?
