Quote:
You can drive at an indicated 80 anyway without worrying about enforcement.
Martin
That's crap and you know it!
If I drove past a marked (or unmarked unit) doing 70 and I was at 80 I WOULD be pulled over and may or may not be NIP'd on the spot.
Mr LTi 20-20 would be all over my ass too! The only thing I MIGHT not trip is a Gatso! SPECS - expect a letter awading you points. 'Speeding' or correctly noted as 'exceeding the speed limit' is an offence the instant you exceed the posted limit. It is a generally acceted 'rule' that we, the public are given a 10% +2mph leeway,
but this is not the law - and enforcement varies from force to force & scameraship to scameraship. You CAN be procecuted for 71 (never gonna happen though - too difficult to prove), and it does not actiually HAVE to be
proved what speed you were actually going. The word of ONE P.C. can have you fined & pointed using his expert opinion only. No devices or readings required. As for partnership operators, these are BY LAW supposed to form an opinion of excessive speed BEFORE targeting a vehicle. IF they get lucky, and target a vehicle at say 75 - fair game. A faulty speedo etc. is no excuse. The law has been broken.
Come to think of it....and if you're not, sorry for thinking it but as you've wrote...
Quote:
I find that comment somewhat of a personal attack on my judgement. Let it be known that my primary occupation requires me to be a very accurate judge of speed, and I consider myself so.
Do you work for a partnership? Is this why you tow the party line of speed kills? And possibly bump-up your preliminary speed estimates and try to feed mis-information about not worrying about enforcement at 80? Trying to drum up some business eh?
I noticed you made no comment on the centre section of my last post about a possible error.
Quote:
Quote: YOU WROTE I am a fair judge of speed. I am not the local pensioners who say cars doing 40mph are 'racing' along - this was ridiculous. Imagine the view you get as you are stationary in a motorway jam and watching the other side flow freely at normal speeds. That's what it was like
I REPLIED
OK, lets talk speed differential here.....following your example:
YOU (stationary), MOTORWAY traffic (70) - 70 mph.
The claimed '70mph' in 30 zone.
(and I do agree urban speeds of this level are highly innapropriate)
YOU (30mph), 'nutters' (70) = 100mph difference.
If you can't tell the difference between 70 & 100, perhaps some doubt should be cast over your speed perceptions. Especially in light of the first quote - where a drop in your speed by 25% felt the same/as normal as previous).40 road changed to 30
Did I point out either a slip-up or just a simple example gone awry in the heat of typing?
ps. I'm not making this a personal attack on you, I believe I am simply pointing out several areas in which errors appear to have been made. I do not have evidence to believe you ARE in the employ of a partnership or enforcemnet agency, only humerous supposition clearly based on the replies you have made which can be made to fit the 'profile' of an individual very keen on adherance to the limits as they stand.