Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Tue Jun 30, 2026 10:10

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 16:36 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0, ... 03,00.html

Speed camera rise to be curbed

Dipesh Gadher, Transport Correspondent

PLANS to curb the relentless rise in the number of speed cameras on Britain’s roads are expected to be announced by the government this week.

Alistair Darling, the transport secretary, is likely to scrap existing funding arrangements whereby revenue from speeding tickets is ploughed back into new cameras.

The move will mean that the number of camera sites in the country — about 6,000 at the moment — could finally level off.

Ministers are concerned that motorists have lost faith in the system and perceive the devices as primarily a means of generating income rather than saving lives.

The number of £60 fines issued to speeding drivers has increased tenfold in the past decade from 200,000 in 1995 to more than 2m last year.

The country’s 38 camera partnerships, which consist of police forces and local authorities, are currently allowed to keep a proportion of the money raised through fines as long as it is reinvested in more cameras. Any surplus revenue goes to the Treasury. Last year this sum was £22m.

The government wants the partnerships to consider alternative means of improving road safety, such as better layouts at junctions and more visible warning signs, and only to erect speed cameras as a last resort.

Darling is expected to announce that revenue generated by the devices will in future be collected centrally and redistributed to partnerships for a variety of road safety schemes.

Earlier this year the Department for Transport announced a moratorium on the installation of cameras at new sites, blocking applications for 500 devices.

The decision was prompted by a review of performance at Britain’s camera sites. The results of this study may also be unveiled by Darling this week, and are likely to show that cameras are an effective means of reducing casualties.

“There is no doubt that safety cameras save lives,” said a government source.

According to guidelines, fixed cameras may only be installed at sites where there have been four crashes resulting in death or serious injury in the previous three years.

The partnerships argue that not all of these accident blackspots are yet covered.

Last month, however, it emerged that ministers regard Lincolnshire as a model for a new approach to road safety. In that county, officials have managed to reduce casualties while issuing fewer fines.

Local authorities have already been urged by Stephen Ladyman, the road safety minister, to ensure that speed limits are set at “appropriate” levels.

Motorists who are caught marginally over a 30mph limit will have their licences endorsed with just two penalty points rather than the present three, under provisions laid out in the Road Safety Bill, currently going through parliament.
===================================

???

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 17:09 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member

Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 15:49
Posts: 393
SafeSpeed wrote:
The decision was prompted by a review of performance at Britain’s camera sites. The results of this study may also be unveiled by Darling this week, and are likely to show that cameras are an effective means of reducing casualties.


I doubt it'll say they're an extremely effective way of saving lives, or the govt would use it as an excuse to install loads more. What the report probably concludes is that cameras reduce casualties by 10% or something, which then allows the government to save some face and yet retreat on cameras at the same time.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 17:20 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Safe Speed issued the following PR at 15:59 today:

PR262: Speed cameras: 'Road safety Thalidomide'

news: for immediate release

The Sunday Times today reports that the Department for Transport (DfT) are
likely to announce curbs to the speed camera programme this week.

Paul Smith, founder of the Safe Speed road safety campaign
(www.safespeed.org.uk) said: "Road safety progress cannot be restored until
DfT bites the bullet and scraps all speed cameras. They distract drivers, give
false safety priorities and damage the Police public relationship. The side
effects are so wide ranging and so deadly that they will go down in history as
the 'Thalidomide of road safety'. Without speed cameras road safety progress
would have continued and road deaths would be down to around 2,000 per year by
now."

"Road safety has its foundations in psychology because crashes take place when
road users make mistakes. Speed cameras increase pressure and make mistakes
more likely."

"The only safe speed is one that enables a driver to stop in good time if a
hazard develops ahead. The dream that increased speed limit compliance will
improve safety is just that - a dream without foundation."

"Government claims of increased safety at speed camera sites are based on
useless, flawed and misleading studies."

<ends>

Notes for editors
=================

Sunday Times Article:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0, ... 03,00.html

Last week John Maxwell, IAM president, said speed cameras make road safety
worse:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SafeSpeedPR/message/108

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 19:13 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 19:53
Posts: 234
An equivalent of the "cameras are the answer" argument would be for the Dept. of Health to announce that they are closing all A&E depts nationwide and scrapping all ambulance services, however on every street corner there will be a machine which dispenses paracetemol.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 19:25 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
biker wrote:
An equivalent of the "cameras are the answer" argument would be for the Dept. of Health to announce that they are closing all A&E depts nationwide and scrapping all ambulance services, however on every street corner there will be a machine which dispenses paracetemol.


:hehe: But they only install the machines where more than three people had died or been 'seriously injured' by heart attacks. And you would have to put £60 in the machine to get your two paracetamol. And they would declare the scheme a massive sucess.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 00:33 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 01:42
Posts: 686
I have noticed that some of the older GATSO installations in my area have already been removed.

I'm thinking "smoke and mirrors" here.

When ANPR speed enforcement has been rolled out over the entire motorway and trunk road network, the GATSOs will be redundant anyway. Of course, ANPR installations won't count as new "speed cameras" because they're for catching "criminals & terrorists". Yeah, Right. :liar:

_________________
“For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.” - H. L. Mencken


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.075s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]