Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Tue Feb 03, 2026 07:58

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 240 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 12  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 19:48 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 14:04
Posts: 2325
Location: The interweb
Ru88ell wrote:
I note that no-one disagrees that cyclists get killed by other road users.


:welcome: Hi, we have met before, in another place. :wink:

You'll find only a tiny minority here who would suggest the cyclists in this case were anything other than completely innocent victims. Even if the road had been completely snowed over that would be no different.

In answer to your question. Yes, cyclists do get killed by other road users.

However some (not in this case I hasten to add) do have only themselves to blame.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 19:52 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
SafeSpeed wrote:
Police wanted crash road gritted

Police have said they asked for a north Wales road to be gritted an hour before a crash which killed four cyclists.


To my mind ths makes the Police position even worse. It confirms that they knew there was danger.

Umm, hindsight is a wonderful thing. If the police had closed the road because of a tricky patch of black ice we might be condemning them for over-reaction.

My personal view is that you were a little hasty to condemn here.

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 19:54 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Has anyone watched the video of the scene - wanted to see the "gentle bend" mentioned - now given the history of this bit of the road - if the slight s bend is the problem area - with a bad camber - instead of throwing money at the SCP - why do they not straighten it out "in the name of road safety" ---FFS.
DOH forgot that costs money.

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 20:48 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 14:01
Posts: 54
Ernest Marsh wrote:
... one hundred thousand pounds on a separate cycle and foot path - which SOME cyclists choose not to use.



Please don't be so surprised. Most cycle 'footpaths' are not very good at all. They are generally littered with all sorts of rubbish, dog muck, etc. Very often they require the rider to dismount/giveway/stop etc.

Roads are the proper place for most cyclists to be. It only needs the other road users to pay attention, slow down at the right time*, and give enough room so their vehicle wouldn't get dented or scratched if the cyclist fell. It's really easy - I do it myself.

[*Note. I'm not saying slow down all of the time.]


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 20:51 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 00:04
Posts: 2311
botach wrote:
wanted to see the "gentle bend" mentioned


your wish is my command


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 20:53 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 00:04
Posts: 2311
Ru88ell wrote:
Most cycle 'footpaths' are not very good at all.

exactly. there's one near here where they've just painted a green patch on the footpath so if you're stupid enough to use it you're dodging poles, driveways and pedestrians and having to stop at every crossroads.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 21:06 
edited


Last edited by johno1066 on Sun Feb 19, 2006 05:00, edited 1 time in total.

Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 21:07 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
johnsher wrote:
botach wrote:
wanted to see the "gentle bend" mentioned


your wish is my command


Already seen it(ON VIDEO) - as i said - did this happen coz money WASN'T SPENT

If so as Paul said "I'M ANGRY"

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 21:11 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 00:04
Posts: 2311
johno1066 wrote:
To ride two or three abreast in a line not only defines arrogance but i'm afraid stupidity too.


so how else do you suggest 10+ cyclists should ride down a road without causing massive delays?
I can just hear the outcries if our club-run of 40 cyclists start riding along single file with 2 second gaps.

as for this
Quote:
Sorry, but this is the sort of indicent that occurs when you have cyclists, riding as a pack.

I seriously suggest you rethink your hatred of cyclists (are you a masochist?) before you next go driving. What a complete load of rubbish. What if it had been a mini-bus that was wiped out. Would you be arguing for them to be taken off the road?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 21:17 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
johnsher wrote:
johno1066 wrote:
To ride two or three abreast in a line not only defines arrogance but i'm afraid stupidity too.


so how else do you suggest 10+ cyclists should ride down a road without causing massive delays?
I can just hear the outcries if our club-run of 40 cyclists start riding along single file with 2 second gaps.

as for this
[quote]

OK - not 10+cyclists , but a farmer moving 10 cows from field to field - what do you do then

or if it was 40 cows ---??????

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 21:17 
edited


Last edited by johno1066 on Sun Feb 19, 2006 05:00, edited 3 times in total.

Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 21:22 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 00:24
Posts: 2400
Location: Kendal, Cumbria
botach wrote:
johnsher wrote:
johno1066 wrote:
To ride two or three abreast in a line not only defines arrogance but i'm afraid stupidity too.


so how else do you suggest 10+ cyclists should ride down a road without causing massive delays?
I can just hear the outcries if our club-run of 40 cyclists start riding along single file with 2 second gaps.

Without wishing to appear "anti-cyclist" I'd prefer they spread out single file at two second gaps. At least following traffic would then be able to safely pick off each one and overtake, instead of being stuck behind the whole caboodle.

From what I've seen of the strategy employed in cycle road racing (which I find fascinating by the way) I would respectfully suggest that clubs on training runs ride in a pack as practice for the way they ride in team time trials, rather than out of consideration for other road users.

[Dons flak-jacket - runs for cover, cowering]

_________________
CSCP Latin for beginners...
Ticketo ergo sum : I scam therefore I am!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 21:24 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 00:04
Posts: 2311
johno1066 wrote:
I'm not a hater of cyclists you twat!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

no? How dare you suggest that these cyclists deserve what they got for daring to ride in a perfectly legal fashion. It could just have easily been four people in a car, 4 people on 2 motorbikes, whatever. THEY WERE NOT AT FAULT. THEY DID NOT LOSE CONTROL OF THEIR VEHICLES. Right now I suggest that you retract your comments as they are in seriously bad taste.
Once you've done that you may want to spend the time to learn how a bunch works.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 21:27 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 00:04
Posts: 2311
JT wrote:
From what I've seen of the strategy employed in cycle road racing (which I find fascinating by the way) I would respectfully suggest that clubs on training runs ride in a pack as practice for the way they ride in team time trials, rather than out of consideration for other road users.

no, they ride in packs as it's the most efficient way of riding. That it helps out motorists is a welcome side effect. Well behaved groups will go single file in places where it's hard to overtake otherwise.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 21:29 
Offline
Camera Partnership Staff
Camera Partnership Staff
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 19:48
Posts: 1995
i hoped it would not get to the stage where the cyclists got the blame, but alas

_________________
now retired


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 21:31 
edited


Last edited by johno1066 on Sun Feb 19, 2006 05:00, edited 2 times in total.

Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 21:33 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 00:04
Posts: 2311
johno1066 wrote:
Show me where I said that and i'll apologise, until then shut it.


how about right here:

johno1066 wrote:
Sorry, but this is the sort of indicent that occurs when you have cyclists, riding as a pack.


and it seems I'm not the only one to take offence.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 21:33 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 00:24
Posts: 2400
Location: Kendal, Cumbria
johnsher wrote:
johno1066 wrote:
I'm not a hater of cyclists you twat!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

no? How dare you suggest that these cyclists deserve what they got for daring to ride in a perfectly legal fashion. It could just have easily been four people in a car, 4 people on 2 motorbikes, whatever. THEY WERE NOT AT FAULT. THEY DID NOT LOSE CONTROL OF THEIR VEHICLES. Right now I suggest that you retract your comments as they are in seriously bad taste.
Once you've done that you may want to spend the time to learn how a bunch works.

Johnsher, I'm afraid that (aside from the unwarranted insulting language) he does actually have a point.

If a convoy of cars were to drive along the road at quarter-second spacing I'm sure you'd condemn it as unwise, let alone if they were doing so at a competitive speed.

Similarly, if I were riding my bike and another cyclist independently decided to sit on my back wheel I'd be pretty narked about it, especially if I came across an unexpected incident and he went straight into the back of me.

I'm aware that for tactical and strategic reasons that's the way it's done in cycle racing, but nevertheless from a road safety perspective it has to be said that it would surely be safer if they obeyed the "two second" rule.

So in that sense I feel there is at least a degree of culpability to the cyclists in this instance. In choosing to ride "as a pack" they all but remove the possibility of any evasive action being taken by any of the riders in the event of something unexpected happening.

_________________
CSCP Latin for beginners...
Ticketo ergo sum : I scam therefore I am!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 21:36 
edited


Last edited by johno1066 on Sun Feb 19, 2006 05:00, edited 1 time in total.

Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 21:38 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
can we please wait till the official response is recieved - but on water - sail before steam prevailes

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 240 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 12  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.061s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]