Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Wed Apr 22, 2026 03:01

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 127 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2006 16:51 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
B cyclist wrote:
Well, your sentence can be read both ways.

Try it.


I can't read it any other way.

Frankly I think you're just confused about the different aspects of overall risk. But if I'm mistaken, perhaps you would like to suggest forms of words that would make the important distinction clear to you (and by implication, clear to others).

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2006 17:09 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 13:01
Posts: 472
"White van man has fewer crashes per mile travelled than any other road users"


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2006 17:16 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 13:01
Posts: 472
Anyway, regardless of how it could be worded, did you see which quote the BBC took...

http://www.safespeed.org.uk/forum/viewt ... highlight=

:wink:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2006 17:20 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
B cyclist wrote:
"White van man has fewer crashes per mile travelled than any other road users"


Nope. I can't say that.

I don't have figures for 'crashes' - or a definition of 'crash' for that matter. And I don't have figures for pedestrian 'crashes' per unit distance (whatever pedestrian 'crashes' might be).

Figures for 'injury crashes' and 'serious injury crashes' are available (but don't extend to pedestrian accidents (i.e. accidents between pedestrians)), but are subject to very substantial reporting anomalies (so I try to avoid using them).

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2006 17:21 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
B cyclist wrote:
Anyway, regardless of how it could be worded, did you see which quote the BBC took...

http://www.safespeed.org.uk/forum/viewt ... highlight=

:wink:


Sure. It pays to write something challenging.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2006 17:28 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 13:01
Posts: 472
Ah, I see.

Getting quoted is more important than getting the message across in an unambiguous way.

Now I understand. :D


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2006 17:35 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
B cyclist wrote:
Ah, I see.

Getting quoted is more important than getting the message across in an unambiguous way.

Now I understand. :D


You really are driving me nuts. Are you an ambassador for cycling by any chance?

:hehe: :bunker:

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2006 18:02 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 13:01
Posts: 472
Hell no!!

I am someone who has an interest in figures, and has experience in dealing the media in different fields.

I drive and I cycle.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2006 18:10 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 16:02
Posts: 372
So you'll have understood that the BBC chose the quote to make it fit their story, rather than fit in with Paul's intentions; and yet still decided to make an ever-so-slightly fatuous remark in your post! :D

As you have such an interest in figures and dealings with the media, might you not offer your services to help Paul in his dealing with the press? :)

I'm sure he would not be ungrateful for some genuine constructive advice in how to improve the delivery of the Safespeed message.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2006 18:29 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 13:01
Posts: 472
I've just been trying that!!! :D :D :D


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2006 21:19 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 23:42
Posts: 3820
handy wrote:
Safespeed: We don't need no stinking cameras, we need better education so driver standards improve.

Govt: Here's some improved driver education for a large sector of the driving public.

Safespeed: yeah but no but yeah but no but I meant a different kind of education and anyway you can't say anything cos that Alistair Darling has got points on his license and he was a roadrager.

Of course I am paraphrasing here.

[still laughing]



I do believe that Sarah Kennedy on her dawn patrol came up with the term "White Van Man" in an early morning rant over being cut iup by a number of these - al were dirty white vans as well - apparently :lol: :lol:

I gather all who drive vans for a living are eligble to sign up for the free courses. I would extend to all drivers of any car personally - but what the heck - we can stop them - offer a DIS course at their cost for our time helping them....

I will agree that the reporting and media hype on this leaves lot to be desired - but the intention is sound. As for cutting costs - ... yes ....of course.

If you drive any vehicle with pride in your drive and respect for your wheels - you are going to incure less wear and tear and this apllies to bicycles as well as "furious pedalling" does wear out saddle, gears, brakes, headsets fairly qquickly ;))

Not read the whole thread through yet - by the way.

But basically - anything like this offered for free - snatch their hands off! :lol: Just remember how much you paid for each driving lesson ;)

If it helps road safety - then it proves exactly what we are saying - better road sense and awareness and C O A S T training work a hell of a lot better than a camera sited in a place which only serves to undermine road safety as opposed to enhance it.


By the way - we do have a camera van and our ladss and lasses do use modern equipment - but our strategy is based on "intelligent pollicing and not fleecing!" ;))

It would appear to work - as despite the unavoidables - we are still on targets here . ;)


In fairness to Darling - he has test driven a van on this PR course and is honest enough to admit it does not make him an expert as he had never driven a van before that moment - but he recekoned he learned a littlem more understanding from his little "adventure" and this can be heard both on the Vine Prog and "youi and Yours" on R4.

_________________
Take with a chuckle or a grain of salt
Drive without COAST and it's all your own fault!

A SMILE is a curve that sets everything straight (P Diller).

A Smiley Per post
FINES USfor our COAST!


Approach love and cooking with reckless abandon - but driving with a smile and a COAST calm mind.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2006 21:28 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 23:42
Posts: 3820
handy wrote:
SafeSpeed wrote:
This tells me that DfT aren't looking at data - they are making their plans based on rumour and individual perception. And you're damn right I'm angry about that.


It's called politics - it's very similar to the scaremongering and hype tactics used by the trash media to boost circulation of their papers (q.v. the Murdoch papers 'peado' campaign that led to a Paeditrician being hounded out of a community).

So is higher standard of education required? If yes, then this is at least a start. If no, then strict controls are required to enforce behaviour.


Andy

Politics which seek to govern, make laws which benefit society as a whole is one thing.

Nightmare politics - based on myth, legend and dodgy manipulation of statistical data is another.

Not against this policy - welcome and applaud it.

But I will concede that the heavy handed wording and all media slants have yet again undermined the whole project.

_________________
Take with a chuckle or a grain of salt
Drive without COAST and it's all your own fault!

A SMILE is a curve that sets everything straight (P Diller).

A Smiley Per post
FINES USfor our COAST!


Approach love and cooking with reckless abandon - but driving with a smile and a COAST calm mind.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2006 21:36 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 23:42
Posts: 3820
Lum wrote:
I think the fuel efficiency problems of white vans are not down to the drivers revving them to death, which of course they do regularly, it's cheapskate companies thinking that a diesel 60hp car derived van will save them money compared to a more powerful model.

They are then loaded to capacity and the only way to get any acceleration out of them at all is to floor it right at the top end of the rev range where the engine is performing at it's most inefficient and polluting.

Plus, if you get in the way of said white van, the driver is not going to want to slow down because they know it will take then half an hour to get back up to speed, thus trying agressive tactics to get you out of the way is more beneficial.


So, the companies save a few grand on the initial purchase price then pay for it many times over in increased fuel consumption, engine wear and other maintenance etc. so once again another problem caused by letting the accountants run things.

Give me an AstraVan VX-R any day :)


Employers have a lot to with this. Reps. van drivers are set some unrealistic targets and given some pretty inefficient vehicles to do the job as well.

By the way - have driven many vans over the years... not the the same "animal" as a car or even a lorry - and I do welcome any intiative to help matters improve.

_________________
Take with a chuckle or a grain of salt
Drive without COAST and it's all your own fault!

A SMILE is a curve that sets everything straight (P Diller).

A Smiley Per post
FINES USfor our COAST!


Approach love and cooking with reckless abandon - but driving with a smile and a COAST calm mind.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2006 21:48 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 23:42
Posts: 3820
B cyclist wrote:
Well, I question the demonising of cyclists. The story was about WVM, and you chose to use cyclists as your comparator. Rather than say "From the pedestrians perspective, commercial vans are actually the safest vehicle on the road, safer than any other motorised vehicle. SafeSpeed asks why vans have been singled out?"

Or something like that.

Perhaps there is an inbuilt bias against cycles in the SafeSpeed campaign? Why are they in your stats when they are so different from other vehicles and speed cameras and fixed speed limits have virtually nothing to do with them?


Your PR has done little to bridge the divide between motorists and cyclists. The opposite, in fact. I still maintain it was poorly thought out. Renat-a-quote, in fact.


There are some chav cyclists around mate. Mad Doc did report falling into gas works and requiring stitches back in the summer after a chav cyclist from hell forced his way past him at some pavement gas works.

He was a right wus over it by all accounts.... :lol:

Good and bad amongst all - but anyone who drives for a living should have qualifications above the normal standard in any case. :wink:

_________________
Take with a chuckle or a grain of salt
Drive without COAST and it's all your own fault!

A SMILE is a curve that sets everything straight (P Diller).

A Smiley Per post
FINES USfor our COAST!


Approach love and cooking with reckless abandon - but driving with a smile and a COAST calm mind.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2006 21:53 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 23:42
Posts: 3820
B cyclist wrote:
It is not about offending, it is about making an appropriate point.

How many people have been killed by WVM in the last 4 years?


Lot been injured.. lot of cars written off with slight injuries to drivers and passengers - but these are vans of ALL colours! Also rep mobiles cause some of this and I would say that they are a type of WVM as well.

We are talking KSI and we are talking about reducing risk to ALL road users in any case and I see nothing wrong with the initiative - but will agree that the wording has been more than unfortunate and undermined the whole :censored: point. :roll:

Probably what this government may have been hoping to achieve any way .. :scratchchin:

By the way - no one "demonises" cyclists here. I still do not read anything untoward in a report tating that a cyclist collided with a car or a car collided with a cyclist.

I have always objected to RTC for this reason. Apart from our loathsome boy racers and persons who deliberately drive recklessly - all "collisions" which occur when Mr & Mrs Averge Normal are behind the wheel or riding a bike are ACCIDENTS! I will usually refer to tragedies as ACCIDENTS and RTAs for that reason as "collision" implies "deliberate" and it is just as easy for a cyclist to collide with something and it is for a motorist - especially if one or more of the C O A S T is missing.... :roll:

For record though - I did not read anything other than sympathy in any report relating to the appalling Welsh tragedy. I was amazed at the way thigs were twisted to imply something completely different. But then..... we know a little more than we can say in public about all this ...

_________________
Take with a chuckle or a grain of salt
Drive without COAST and it's all your own fault!

A SMILE is a curve that sets everything straight (P Diller).

A Smiley Per post
FINES USfor our COAST!


Approach love and cooking with reckless abandon - but driving with a smile and a COAST calm mind.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2006 22:12 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 23:42
Posts: 3820
B cyclist wrote:
You are looking at the van driver's chance of killing a pedestrian over miles travelled compared with a cyclist's chance of killing a pedestrian over miles travelled.

I am looking at the pedestrians chance of being killed by a van compared with the chance of being killed by a cyclist.

These are very different statistics, and they will show that a pedestrian has more chance of being killed by a van than by a cycle.

Or is that not what the figures are showing? I'm confused!


Stats - alas - show what we WANT them to SHOW!

We also interpret them to mean what we want to prove.

Oh ....but however you want to play with Durham's figures - we do do what we set out to do - cop the baddy, reduce the tragedies., serve the public...and we do try to adopt "time honoured PC Dixon" practices to get there... ;)

_________________
Take with a chuckle or a grain of salt
Drive without COAST and it's all your own fault!

A SMILE is a curve that sets everything straight (P Diller).

A Smiley Per post
FINES USfor our COAST!


Approach love and cooking with reckless abandon - but driving with a smile and a COAST calm mind.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2006 22:54 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 21:17
Posts: 3734
Location: Dorset/Somerset border
How did a thread about van drivers end up being about pushbikes anyway? :?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2006 23:28 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 13:01
Posts: 472
Johnnytheboy wrote:
How did a thread about van drivers end up being about pushbikes anyway? :?


Check out the PR from Paul.

In Gear: I'm having difficulty going through your 5 posts... Am I supposed to follow your argument or are you a civil servant? :D :D :D


Last edited by B cyclist on Fri Jan 27, 2006 10:12, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2006 23:53 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 21:15
Posts: 699
Location: Belfast
:gatso2: So Alastair Darling claims he's been driven mad by VVM?

I thought he was for considering a road pricing scheme. :rotfl:

_________________
Anyone who tells you that nothing is impossible has never bathed in a saucer of water.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 00:09 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
CJG wrote:
:gatso2: So Alastair Darling claims he's been driven mad by VVM?

I thought he was for considering a road pricing scheme. :rotfl:


You missed the "ER" of the mad :lol:

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 127 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 245 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.163s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]