handy wrote:
In Gear wrote:
B cyclist wrote:
5% That's all. Just 5%.
1 in 20.
Can you prove this figure?
what is there to prove? that 5% does equate to 1 in 20?
That 5% can really share a car commute. I could take some bloke with me and drop him off - but I'd be going two miles out of my way and would add to my journey time. Also - I do not work the same hours and if an emergency crops up - I cannot walk away - my patients do come first. So - he'd be a bit stuck!
Wildy works a bit further on and her hours are more or less "stable" - but even so - if she dropped me off and then had to wait for me - we then have a problem with kittencare.
True - we chose to live here - but my job was around here (in a Cumbrian hospital) when we moved here - I moved as I climbed up the professional ladder - and basically if we were to move to one of the leafy 'burbs satelliting the big towns - we'd still be in the same situation of long jams and no one working at same place as ourselves.
Quote:
B Cyclist wrote:
Companies can also consider if all the journeys are essential, and if there are other solutions. Car sharing once a fortnight reduces your commute by 5%. etc.
The way to work it out is as follows:
1
-- x 100
20
Andy - since these people scream "peer review" and "back up from some obscure internet site - I want him to provide
mor than one accredited and acclaimed source proving this.
I think this is what Charles was getting at...but trying to be "tactful!"
Quote:
Car sharing may be difficult but not impossible - I work in an office with 2 colleagues, we try to plan our visits to other sites so that we can car share, not for the 'eco' benefits but for the social aspects.
Yes - but this is after you have arrived at work. Lotss of firms do this - know for fact accountant pals and relatives drives selves to the offices and then his team of auditors pile onto one car and go off the the clients together. Again reason why they do not give a lift to someone living nearby has more to do with travel to different places and directions - which can mean lengthy detours which rather add to problems rather than solve them.
I also know of one lady who works in North Trafford Hospital and lives in Sale which is not far. But it takes her two hours to get to and from work by public transport including long waits and cancelled buses. It takes her 10 minutes by car and it seems her neighbours work in Bolton, Manchester, Altrincham, Stockport....but not in the Urmston/Flixton area of Manchester....
B Cyclist wrote:
Quote:
The Mad Cats work in opposite directions as well and no one near them works where they do ...agreed they are bit of beaten track ....and even if they decide to work in USA as on cards - they stilll face same problem of commutes.
I'm afraid this makes no sense to me at all. Are they going to work in Las Vegas?
Nope. Still weighing this one up. Wildy has been asked to head some research in USA and I've also been head hunted to research some lurgy or other over there.
Problem? I happen to like living in Cumbria despite the Speed Finder General - and I do not want to maroon my eldest at Uni in St Andrews or disrupt our

-t-t-t-twins' studies - especially when we have to work on the discipline in this area with these two... Also - we have to consider how the younger ones will take to a change - one tweeny, two rogues ... our youngest is only 15 months so she's out of this equation.
But even so - should we bite the proverbial and accept this rather lucrative and "look good on our respecctive cv's" offer - we'd still be travelling in opposite directions to get to where we have been offered these positions.
We plan on a "recce" during the kids' half term to check on housing, schools and so on...to try to make up our minds.
