A post on the unsigned_forms group alerted me to this:
http://www.asa.org.uk/adjudications/sho ... n_id=38557
The didn't uphold one part which challenged the claims that KSI dropped by 30% but it was probably a close call for LSCP, and text
"The Authority noted the West London trial report stated that, relative to control data, 12.1% only of KSI reduction was directly attributable to the presence of speed cameras." is pretty funny!
edit: And some news articles on it already - the rulings are usually sent out in advance with an embargo:
Speed trap claims slammed
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/traffic/a ... 20Standard
PULLING A FAST ONE
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/allnews/tm ... _page.html
Gareth