Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Mon Nov 17, 2025 14:45

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 09:48 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 16:34
Posts: 923
Location: UK
A post on the unsigned_forms group alerted me to this:
http://www.asa.org.uk/adjudications/sho ... n_id=38557

The didn't uphold one part which challenged the claims that KSI dropped by 30% but it was probably a close call for LSCP, and text "The Authority noted the West London trial report stated that, relative to control data, 12.1% only of KSI reduction was directly attributable to the presence of speed cameras." is pretty funny!

edit: And some news articles on it already - the rulings are usually sent out in advance with an embargo:

Speed trap claims slammed
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/traffic/a ... 20Standard

PULLING A FAST ONE
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/allnews/tm ... _page.html


Gareth


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.023s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]