speeddeamon wrote:
i am an 18 year old male that is exactly what you guys are talking about. i think that speeding is not a very big problem. i know that there is many people against speeding but i believe that it can be good. when i got my license when i was 16 i started speeding right away. not that bad at first but it was worse after i got used to it. i now speed all the time and it is just part of the way i drive. i dont believe that it is dangerous. i know the consequences but it is well worth it. i believe that i am a much better driver because of speeding. after you drive 120mph (what my car tops out at) many times 45 is very slow and easy to drive at. i now know the limits of my car and what it is capable of. i have also never been in an accident or recieved a speeding ticket (1 "rolling" stop even though i believe i was innocent). when you get older than you will most likely slow down but if you know what you're doing i have no problem with speeding. just wanted to give my opinion, thanks.
Perhaps you would do well to read this site carefully. And the link to the one I give below.
Whilst the Swiss family have lost no young in car crashes - they have given strong financial backing to this group - and two of them helped set up the site aimed at the young "LEARN AND LIVE!"
Lot of useful stuff on there - including the German system (backs Ted's post about this when this forum first opened) and I would strongly recommend that if you are a genuine poster and not trolling
I would urge you to read this web site without delay It is not just appluaded by Durham Police, Brake and Road Peace - it even has Jeremy Clarkson's and Quentin Wilson's seals of approval on Top Gear as "one to listen to".
Not a bad achievement to have polarised campaigns in support and we could say this with belladonna's contributions to this site as well.
Road safety is about more than speed - and cameras. It's about
attitude and COAST skills http://www.learnandlive.pwp.blueyonder. ... index.htmlPlease read the facts about newly qualified youngsters.
Young males pass the test more easily than others - qand our present test is of a much lower level than German, Swiss, Austrian, French ones - and Italy is in the process of rejigging because of increasing a/strade limits.
Why we have a two year probationary? (Due to be increased in the above countries to three years and no doubt UK will follow in time)
All statistical dat collated seemed to show that accident rated dropeed by 30% after the first year and by a furhter 20% after the second year. Hence - France plans to increase the period as from next year and Germany plans to follow.
Per the site and I have no questions about their stats - have stats which verify from our own records ...
Quote:
Research into hazard perception clealy shows that inexperienced drivers (and I would also include novice bikers and novice cyclists in this) shows that inexperienced drivers are up to a very long TWO SECONDS slower in recognising possible dangers than experienced drivers.
So - petulant child or troll - think about how far your car has travelled at 45 mph in the two seconds past that school or towards that ice cream van - or the effect this has on your limit point on veru sharp twisty roads.
(And we will have you in Durham - make no mistake on this - we do target idiots here - tis our speciality!

)
Lot of other things - some backing insurance company claims - and whilst I agree youngsters tend to have more accidents when with their peers and at night - I would be against "curfews and banning young passengers "
I would say that trying to address the safety issues and their argument for graduated licences on the site is a sound one on the whole
from learn and live wrote:
Unsafe drivers are more likely to take risks in everyday life. Perhaps we should look at school records and attitudes to authority when considering granting provisional licences to 17 year olds.
Perhaps Europe has the right idea. Many manufactruing plants will not allow under 18s to operate some machinery - so perhaps this should apply to cars. We are, after all, "operating machinery"
learnndlive wrote:
Unsafe drivers do not plan or think ahead.
Driving instructors who judge a driver as unsafe are good predictors of later crashes
Basically - if they have no aptitude - best to say so and suggest growing up a bit more and then having another go.
Quote:
Passing a test quickly does notr relate to later safe or unsafe driving.
The accident rate of young girls is also increasing - and could be in line with increased assertiveness
Useful site - and Paul - you may find their stats useful for comparison with yours - they do appear to show similarities and Durham provides links to this site amongst others.
Our troll should also consider reading this other worthy site aimed at young people.
http://www.bexley.gov.uk/service/roadsafety/brag/
And I also agree with Paul's reply to you amongst others.
I urge you to read Paul's entire site throughly - especially the Cyclings and Improve Driving sections - as well as the links provided as well as
www.ask-what-if.com
and the IAM site.
I also suggest you buy the following:
Driving - Essential skills
AA - How to become an expert driver
Road Craft
Cycle Craft
Motorcycle Craft
Highway Code
and any works by Paul Ripley and John Lyons.