Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sun Nov 09, 2025 16:06

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 193 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 04, 2006 12:05 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 01:59
Posts: 280
Alternative solution: Prosecute tailgaters. Then there will be plenty of gaps in lane 1 so long as traffic is flowing above around 10/20mph. Problem solved.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 04, 2006 12:22 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 18:41
Posts: 893
scanny77 wrote:
PeterE wrote:

Quote:
I also think that new drivers MUST receive a minimum of at least 5 hours motorway tuition before the magic ticket is issued.

Not exactly practical if you live in Truro or Inverness.


if they live up there, does that mean they will NEVER use a motorway in their life? NO!

inconvenience is no excuse for not being appropriately trained

I don't know about Inverness, but I do know about Truro and points West. From the centre of Truro to the start of the nearest motorway is a ninety mile/2hr trip each way in winter and takes considerably longer in summer. Also there are parts of the UK a lot more remote than that (e.g. the Scilly Isles) and inhabitants wouldn't see a motorway in years. It is completely absurd to withhold someone's license just because they've no experience of a road type they are unlikely to use, to which they have no realistic access, and about which they'll probably have forgotten by the time they get to use it for real. Compulsory motorway training for such folks is (IMO) entirely inappropriate.

Now motorways are statistically the safest roads in the country. Given that many pass their tests with only 12 hours tuition, I can't see any justification for adding a further 5 hours - an increase of 40% - to impart what can be imparted in less than half an hour on a single run to a place three junctions up the motorway from where you joined it.

If we are to not allow drivers to use motorways until they've had motorway isntruction, then why not issue a restricted license that can be upgraded on production of a certificate of additional training - just like the difference between restricted and unrestricted microlight licenses.

_________________
Will


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 04, 2006 12:40 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
scanny77 wrote:
PeterE wrote:

Quote:
I also think that new drivers MUST receive a minimum of at least 5 hours motorway tuition before the magic ticket is issued.

Not exactly practical if you live in Truro or Inverness.


if they live up there, does that mean they will NEVER use a motorway in their life? NO!

inconvenience is no excuse for not being appropriately trained


Everyone wants better driving standards, but early training probably isn't the right way to achieve it. Without motorway training our motorways are already literally the safest roads in the world - and we need to ask how that works. This IS a question I've asked - and I've found that self-learning and cultural influences are absolutely fundamental. If we want to improve we need to work on things like information, beliefs, sense of responsibility, observation skills and risk management - rather than rules or early training.

The BIG problem with early training is that we're so busy trying to figure out how to operate the vehicle and comply with the rules that we simply cannot really start to learn things like observation and anticipation skills until later.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 04, 2006 15:21 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 15:14
Posts: 420
Location: Aberdeenshire
I only had 6 hours of tuition total so would have been quite miffed to be have been forced to have another 5 of motorways. Especially given that the nearest for me is the M90 at Perth which is 1hr 20 mins away.

That would be a collection of seriously expensive lessons!

I would not consider getting a driving license if I lived in the remoter places mentioned above. The chances of being caught are negligable anyway so the risk would be far outweighed by the cost and time savings in gaining a license.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 04, 2006 15:49 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2004 11:05
Posts: 1044
Location: Hillingdon
_BOSS_ wrote:
Can I try make this as simple as it really is?


Simple, given all the possible permutations of junction layout, main carriageway traffic densities/speeds, slip-road traffic densities/speeds, and performance of your vehicle???

_BOSS_ wrote:
I can join the motorway in my car without causing a pile up or without causing anyone to have to move over or adjust their speed.


You've got L1 full of cars, stretching as far back along L1 as you can see, all doing a steady 70 in close proximity to one another, such that it'd be unsafe to try squeezing your car inbetween.

_BOSS_ wrote:
I can also join the motorway in my truck without causing a pile up, simply by observing the traffic flow and volumes whilst travelling the slip road.


You've got L1 full of HGVs on the limiter, as far as the eye can see, in close proximity to one another, such that you couldn't even get just your cab unit into one of the gaps let alone the trailer you're also hauling.


For both scenarios, explain how you'd safely and legally join L1. Any answer which involves stopping at the end of the slip road or on the hard shoulder will earn you serious -ve points, given the increased danger involved in then trying to merge with L1 from a standing start.


_BOSS_ wrote:
How many times do you see a car hurtle up the slip road to join an empty motorway and drive straight into the middle lane where they stay?


I don't see how a desire to sit in L2 at all times has any relevance to someone's ability to join the motorway in the first place-you can have good lane discipline yet still be utter pants at judging the merge, and vice versa.

_________________
Chris


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 04, 2006 15:53 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 22:21
Posts: 925
JT wrote:
I still think the only really sensible long term solution is to make the motorway give priority to joining traffic. I guess this could be done either...


From my all too brief but yet very interesting foray on the Peripherique, giving way to joining traffic didn't feel all that different to what goes on in practice on Britains motorways and seemed to work pretty well, the traffic was very heavy but still flowed freely.

In all time I have used motorways, and that was an awful lot in my previous job I can't think of a time where I have had a problem in joining. All it takes is a practical common sense approach by both parties. If you are the ONLY car on the slip road and there is ONE car on the carriageway, dont be arrogant and drive alongside the only car because it just happens to be at the exact point in the road you wish to join.... ease of a bit a join behind. Its good manners. However, if there is a stream of vehicles coming down the slip road then it makes damn good sense to get into Lane 2 as early as possible. I would even go as far as to indicate my intentions to L2 and most people will have spotted why. I have never had someone complaing becuase I have got into L2 early. Its far safer then all the cars trying to merge from the sliproad.

The only problem I can see is if the vehicle in L1 cant get into L2, but this is comparitavely rare. Even so, providing a good gap has been left in L1 between you and the vehicle in front, merging should still be able to be done safely, even if this means some speed ajustment from those already on the motorway.

However, in extreme cases, and this has never happend to me so far, if there is absolutely no options available to the vehicle in L1 then the onus should be on the slip road vehicle to brake. This is so rare though that if its happening to you as both either a slip road vehicle or a L1 vehicle then perhaps you need to to look to see if there is anything you maybe able to improve on. (Thats not being directed at anyone personally)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 04, 2006 16:20 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 05:00
Posts: 12
Twister wrote:
_BOSS_ wrote:
Can I try make this as simple as it really is?


Simple, given all the possible permutations of junction layout, main carriageway traffic densities/speeds, slip-road traffic densities/speeds, and performance of your vehicle???

_BOSS_ wrote:
I can join the motorway in my car without causing a pile up or without causing anyone to have to move over or adjust their speed.


You've got L1 full of cars, stretching as far back along L1 as you can see, all doing a steady 70 in close proximity to one another, such that it'd be unsafe to try squeezing your car inbetween.

_BOSS_ wrote:
I can also join the motorway in my truck without causing a pile up, simply by observing the traffic flow and volumes whilst travelling the slip road.


You've got L1 full of HGVs on the limiter, as far as the eye can see, in close proximity to one another, such that you couldn't even get just your cab unit into one of the gaps let alone the trailer you're also hauling.


For both scenarios, explain how you'd safely and legally join L1. Any answer which involves stopping at the end of the slip road or on the hard shoulder will earn you serious -ve points, given the increased danger involved in then trying to merge with L1 from a standing start.


_BOSS_ wrote:
How many times do you see a car hurtle up the slip road to join an empty motorway and drive straight into the middle lane where they stay?


I don't see how a desire to sit in L2 at all times has any relevance to someone's ability to join the motorway in the first place-you can have good lane discipline yet still be utter pants at judging the merge, and vice versa.


Whats all the above about? if you read my post I said that I never have any problems joining a motorway. It's alright making up a fake scenario but even when traffic in the left lane is nose to tail, I have no problem merging.
I live on the motorways averaging 500km per night. I start my shift during the tea time rush hour and finish normally around the start of the morning rush hour so I think I have enough knowledge on the subject unlike a few part time experts on here. I get to work by travelling on the motorway in my high powered car and once there I rejoin the motorways in my sluggish heavily laden truck.

Please carry on arguing the toss over who should and shouldn't do what because this is getting boring now. You will come back saying that it is a forum where people have their opinions and a right to express them ..... true....but you would think after reading all the posts by the boys/girls who use our motorways the most, and realizing that they all say roughly the same thing, that others would take the point and start paying attention.

The system is fine as it is and the sooner people stop making excuses for those who don't know how to drive on the motorways the better. It's ok quoting defensive driving and wearing your hi vis vest whilst driving but if everyone drove according to the highway code then we wouldn't have a problem. Train or prosecute the ones getting it wrong.
In the meantime I will continue to operate the way I always have done and keep an eye open for the coffin dodger doing 30 when joining the carriageway.
You can continue to tell me the I am in the wrong but it does not change my clean driving record or the amount of miles I cover accident free. As the saying goes...the proof is in the pudding.
Happy driving.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 04, 2006 16:32 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 13:55
Posts: 2247
Location: middlish
Capri2.8i wrote:
However, in extreme cases, and this has never happend to me so far, if there is absolutely no options available to the vehicle in L1 then the onus should be on the slip road vehicle to brake. This is so rare though that if its happening to you as both either a slip road vehicle or a L1 vehicle then perhaps you need to to look to see if there is anything you maybe able to improve on. (Thats not being directed at anyone personally)


a similar example of the above is the slightly bizarre coventry ring road.. which has short & often blind combined on/off slips to a 2 lane ring road, with a 40limit.

its surprisingly uncommon but not that unusual to find yourself level with someone either contnuing round in L1 or worse still, coming off as you try to join.

more often than not its the combination of who had the nose ahead and differential speed that decides who dips the throttle and who dabs the brakes (although the worst case is that you both dab... then dip :shock: ).

anyway... often its not position but timing & relative speeds that is the deciding factor in who does the braking.

(like mway slips i find the best way to handle it is be in a gear a little below the expected speed of the traffic you're joining so you have a good engine brakign response if you need to slow and a good accel response if you need to nip ahead a little..... i have a few other techniques for the blinder slips but its not terribly OT)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 04, 2006 16:41 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 22:21
Posts: 925
ed_m wrote:
anyway... often its not position but timing & relative speeds that is the deciding factor in who does the braking.


Absolutely. If its a question of of the L1 vehicle braking a little or the slip-road vehicle braking a hell of a lot then its so much more sensible for the L1 vehicle to brake a little. In that case it still fits with my post because braking "a little" is a perfectly valid option for L1.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 04:04 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 01:54
Posts: 18
_BOSS_ wrote:
Twister wrote:
_BOSS_ wrote:
Can I try make this as simple as it really is?


Simple, given all the possible permutations of junction layout, main carriageway traffic densities/speeds, slip-road traffic densities/speeds, and performance of your vehicle???

_BOSS_ wrote:
I can join the motorway in my car without causing a pile up or without causing anyone to have to move over or adjust their speed.


You've got L1 full of cars, stretching as far back along L1 as you can see, all doing a steady 70 in close proximity to one another, such that it'd be unsafe to try squeezing your car inbetween.

_BOSS_ wrote:
I can also join the motorway in my truck without causing a pile up, simply by observing the traffic flow and volumes whilst travelling the slip road.


You've got L1 full of HGVs on the limiter, as far as the eye can see, in close proximity to one another, such that you couldn't even get just your cab unit into one of the gaps let alone the trailer you're also hauling.


For both scenarios, explain how you'd safely and legally join L1. Any answer which involves stopping at the end of the slip road or on the hard shoulder will earn you serious -ve points, given the increased danger involved in then trying to merge with L1 from a standing start.


_BOSS_ wrote:
How many times do you see a car hurtle up the slip road to join an empty motorway and drive straight into the middle lane where they stay?


I don't see how a desire to sit in L2 at all times has any relevance to someone's ability to join the motorway in the first place-you can have good lane discipline yet still be utter pants at judging the merge, and vice versa.


Whats all the above about? if you read my post I said that I never have any problems joining a motorway. It's alright making up a fake scenario but even when traffic in the left lane is nose to tail, I have no problem merging.
I live on the motorways averaging 500km per night. I start my shift during the tea time rush hour and finish normally around the start of the morning rush hour so I think I have enough knowledge on the subject unlike a few part time experts on here. I get to work by travelling on the motorway in my high powered car and once there I rejoin the motorways in my sluggish heavily laden truck.

Please carry on arguing the toss over who should and shouldn't do what because this is getting boring now. You will come back saying that it is a forum where people have their opinions and a right to express them ..... true....but you would think after reading all the posts by the boys/girls who use our motorways the most, and realizing that they all say roughly the same thing, that others would take the point and start paying attention.

The system is fine as it is and the sooner people stop making excuses for those who don't know how to drive on the motorways the better. It's ok quoting defensive driving and wearing your hi vis vest whilst driving but if everyone drove according to the highway code then we wouldn't have a problem. Train or prosecute the ones getting it wrong.
In the meantime I will continue to operate the way I always have done and keep an eye open for the coffin dodger doing 30 when joining the carriageway.
You can continue to tell me the I am in the wrong but it does not change my clean driving record or the amount of miles I cover accident free. As the saying goes...the proof is in the pudding.
Happy driving.


:clap: I couldn't have put it better myself!

And here endeth the lesson! :lol:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 09:17 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 12:52
Posts: 947
Location: falkirk
Paul, i try not to get involved in elephant races at all. i will hold back and try to judge the best place to go for it and get past ASAP. i dont like being left out in L2

if people cant be trained on motorways due to rural location, restricted licence would be a possible answer. i do wonder about dual carriageways though. same speed limit as a motorway yet far more dangerous with regards to shorter onslips (if at all) added hazards and less room. shouldnt we look at this area before motorways anyway?

_________________
Richie

SSAFA supporter
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=126025031585


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 09:39 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
scanny77 wrote:
if people cant be trained on motorways due to rural location, restricted licence would be a possible answer. i do wonder about dual carriageways though. same speed limit as a motorway yet far more dangerous with regards to shorter onslips (if at all) added hazards and less room. shouldnt we look at this area before motorways anyway?


Yes. Motorways are by far the safest roads and as such should be well down the priority list. Only about 200 of our 3,200 road deaths each year take place on motorways.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 15:07 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 18:47
Posts: 31
ed_m wrote:
Capri2.8i wrote:
However, in extreme cases, and this has never happend to me so far, if there is absolutely no options available to the vehicle in L1 then the onus should be on the slip road vehicle to brake. This is so rare though that if its happening to you as both either a slip road vehicle or a L1 vehicle then perhaps you need to to look to see if there is anything you maybe able to improve on. (Thats not being directed at anyone personally)


a similar example of the above is the slightly bizarre coventry ring road.. which has short & often blind combined on/off slips to a 2 lane ring road, with a 40limit.


Good example, but the unfortunate thing about the Coventry ring road is it's not driven upon in the way it was designed.. The intetion in its design was for traffic to stay in the right hand lane unless entering or exiting, which is of course contrary to the keep to the left hand lane rule..


Quote:
(like mway slips i find the best way to handle it is be in a gear a little below the expected speed of the traffic you're joining so you have a good engine brakign response if you need to slow and a good accel response if you need to nip ahead a little..... i have a few other techniques for the blinder slips but its not terribly OT)


Good advice, always nice to be ready to get out of harms way..

[/quote]

_________________
Dave


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 15:40 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 13:55
Posts: 2247
Location: middlish
shaky wrote:
ed_m wrote:
Capri2.8i wrote:
However, in extreme cases, and this has never happend to me so far, if there is absolutely no options available to the vehicle in L1 then the onus should be on the slip road vehicle to brake. This is so rare though that if its happening to you as both either a slip road vehicle or a L1 vehicle then perhaps you need to to look to see if there is anything you maybe able to improve on. (Thats not being directed at anyone personally)


a similar example of the above is the slightly bizarre coventry ring road.. which has short & often blind combined on/off slips to a 2 lane ring road, with a 40limit.


Good example, but the unfortunate thing about the Coventry ring road is it's not driven upon in the way it was designed.. The intetion in its design was for traffic to stay in the right hand lane unless entering or exiting, which is of course contrary to the keep to the left hand lane rule..


indeed but as such it runs as a DC these days... with all the inherent merge issues (and more)!

that said its very VERY rare to see an accident or any signs of one.
maybe the sheer confusion of most means more caution than normal!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 17:06 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 18:47
Posts: 31
ed_m wrote:
shaky wrote:
ed_m wrote:
Capri2.8i wrote:
However, in extreme cases, and this has never happend to me so far, if there is absolutely no options available to the vehicle in L1 then the onus should be on the slip road vehicle to brake. This is so rare though that if its happening to you as both either a slip road vehicle or a L1 vehicle then perhaps you need to to look to see if there is anything you maybe able to improve on. (Thats not being directed at anyone personally)


a similar example of the above is the slightly bizarre coventry ring road.. which has short & often blind combined on/off slips to a 2 lane ring road, with a 40limit.


Good example, but the unfortunate thing about the Coventry ring road is it's not driven upon in the way it was designed.. The intetion in its design was for traffic to stay in the right hand lane unless entering or exiting, which is of course contrary to the keep to the left hand lane rule..


indeed but as such it runs as a DC these days... with all the inherent merge issues (and more)!

that said its very VERY rare to see an accident or any signs of one.
maybe the sheer confusion of most means more caution than normal!


Yes it is a tad frightening on there if your new to it :D
Maybe thats our answer, design everything along the same lines as Coventrys ring road and scare everyone into paying more attention..

_________________
Dave


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 17:44 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
shaky wrote:
Good example, but the unfortunate thing about the Coventry ring road is it's not driven upon in the way it was designed.. The intetion in its design was for traffic to stay in the right hand lane unless entering or exiting, which is of course contrary to the keep to the left hand lane rule..

Although I am told by locals that a lot of regular users do keep to the right hand lane unless entering or exiting - a good example of how common sense can take priority over a strict application of "the rules".

FWIW I find in practice the vast majority of the time traffic on the mainline of motorways does make some effort to help people joining from slip roads - you only become aware of the issue on the odd occasions when people don't.

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 17:59 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
PeterE wrote:
FWIW I find in practice the vast majority of the time traffic on the mainline of motorways does make some effort to help people joining from slip roads - you only become aware of the issue on the odd occasions when people don't.


:yesyes: ...with heavies being the most helpful.

I notice this especially in my wheezy (the opposite of 'whizzy'?) old campervan which REALLY struggles to get up to motorway speeds on uphill sliproads.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 21:55 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2006 01:59
Posts: 137
Location: Wolverhamptom (exiled Yorkshireman)
SafeSpeed wrote:
Rhythm Thief wrote:
SafeSpeed wrote:
fnegroni wrote:
... Obviously if I want to overtake a truck I make sure that I can overtake quickly enough to be out of his way soon, and certainly do not overtake one near a slip road.


Yes. This comes up again and again in these forums. It's approaching the status of a golden rule.

:listenup: suspend overtaking near slip roads


This is fair enough in principle, but we've established in other threads that truck drivers take a while to overtake, and because no situation on the roads is entirely predictable, our overtaking manoevres may take place past several slip roads. Do we slow down whenever we see a slip coming up? That won't make us popular with traffic behind :wink:


A lot of motorway crashes happen at on ramps when merges go wrong. From memory it's about 35%. If you're in L1 being overtaken by another HGV in L2 and it starts to go wrong there's nothing you can do to steer to safety. On the other hand if there's a gap alongside in L2 then you have life saving escape space.

If you can see the on ramp is deserted then fair enough. If the on ramp is busy then a tiny early lift might save your life.

It seems to me that the damn limiters must have desensitized truckers to the very real additional risks associated with driving alongside another vehicle.


With respect, Paul. I think you've missed my point. What I was trying to get at was:
If I pull out to overtake a truck doing 54 to my 56 at, say, J10 of the Southbound M6, I'm potentially in the middle lane and alongside that truck while going past 3 or 4 on slips. You can either acknowledge that there will be a huge queue of HGVs in lane 1 (creating havoc at the off slip with motorists trying to exit the motorway at the last minute), all suspending overtaking until a stretch of motorway with no junctions comes along, or live with the fact that an overtake in an HGV potentially takes a loooooong time.
I don't especially like having another truck on one side of me and a long line of cars trying to get on the motorway on the other. I don't like being that truck in L2 either. But it happens sometimes, and when it does, it's for the joining traffic to sort a gap out for itself. I'll back off and help if I can, but if there's another truck on my back bumper (something else I don't like), this too can be difficult. And, finally, I have no sympathy at all for people who creep along my inside level with the front of my trailer and are clearly expecting me to move over.

_________________
We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the kerb.


Last edited by Rhythm Thief on Wed Jul 05, 2006 23:51, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 23:16 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 18:42
Posts: 1283
Location: Essex
Shaky / Boss, I agree with the idea of m-way testing for car drivers, IMO the current car drivingtest is inadequate, I passed my test friday, drove to Cornwall saturday.

I feel we should have a multi stage test where stage 2 is m-way/dc/fast road driving.


A pet hate I'm finding is that a lot of car drivers around my way are pootling up the slip roads at 30-40mph, and just don't seem to be looking for a space to go into. When I join m-ways, I look for a safe space and adjust my speed to 'meet' that space, normally is means speeding up, but in rush hour can often mean slowing down, I'm happy to use my throttle to control my spacing, a lot of car drivers I see seem to pick a 'joining speed' irrespective of conditions and drive at that.

_________________
Gordon Brown saying I got the country into it's current economic mess so I'll get us out of it is the same as Bomber Harris nipping over to Dresden and offering to repair a few windows.

Chaos, panic and disorder - my work here is done.

http://www.wildcrafts.co.uk


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 06, 2006 15:36 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 01:54
Posts: 18
Safety Engineer wrote:
Shaky / Boss, I agree with the idea of m-way testing for car drivers, IMO the current car drivingtest is inadequate, I passed my test friday, drove to Cornwall saturday.

I feel we should have a multi stage test where stage 2 is m-way/dc/fast road driving.


A pet hate I'm finding is that a lot of car drivers around my way are pootling up the slip roads at 30-40mph, and just don't seem to be looking for a space to go into. When I join m-ways, I look for a safe space and adjust my speed to 'meet' that space, normally is means speeding up, but in rush hour can often mean slowing down, I'm happy to use my throttle to control my spacing, a lot of car drivers I see seem to pick a 'joining speed' irrespective of conditions and drive at that.


Congrats on passing your test and from what you've written, it sounds like you'll become an excellent driver! :wink:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 193 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.089s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]