Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sat Aug 29, 2026 08:25

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 08:00 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
The shape of things to come

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2006/07/17/1152988475631.html

Quote:
WHEN a plane crashes, investigators look for the black box to reconstruct the event. Now, in a case that may shape future car crash court cases, NSW police have been allowed to download data from a car involved in a high-profile fatal crash.

The NSW Supreme Court agreed to the download after the car's owner took out an injunction restraining police from examining data in the car's computer systems. Experts say that depending on the model and make of car, information such as brake use, what gear was used, and the speed at the time airbags inflated is retained in a vehicle's electronic control unit (ECU).

The car owner's daughter, a Queenwood schoolgirl, had been driving the Peugeot 206 convertible in Mosman in June 2004 when she crashed, killing a friend and injuring two other passengers.

Police impounded the car and retrieved some data from its ECU. But the teenager has appealed against her conviction, challenging the download, which allegedly showed she was travelling at 90kmh. Her appeal will be decided today in the District Court.

The Supreme Court heard the Director of Public Prosecutions had decided not to depend on the initial data download, prompting police to seek another one.

The teenager's father took out

an injunction in May last year stopping the police, or Peugeot technicians, from downloading further information. Justice Joseph Campbell was told the family did not want Peugeot technicians involved if there was the possibility of a defect in the car.

The judge allowed the new download three weeks ago, with restrictions.

A police spokeswoman confirmed it was the first time police had used such information in a car court case but said they had been using downloads from trucks involved in crashes for years.

A technical expert, who wished to remain anonymous, said the computers were designed to aid service and maintenance, and only incidentally retained data of use in reconstructing a crash.

He said although the Peugeot's airbag ECU would have information about speed at time of impact, the airbag computer module would have be sent to Europe for downloading.

"Police forensic examinations can work out the speed at which the wheel was locked, but that takes a fair amount of work. If they can just say to the car 'what happened here' - and the car tells them - it then becomes really an issue of privacy and civil rights," he said.

"A number of safety organisations, not just the police, have been calling on manufacturers to fit black boxes in cars. Obviously what has made it simpler is cars have become more and more electronically controlled and it's easier to have some form of data recorder on it."

Robert McDonald, head of industry research with NRMA Insurance, said in North America insurance companies were using the car's computer data to work out who was at fault. In Australia computer technology tracking keys were used when investigating fraudulent theft claims.

"I do have concerns for privacy issues and who owns the data," Mr McDonald said.

"[On the other hand] I think it could be a valuable tool for police, and maybe it would serve a speed camera-like reminder for people that they may be held responsible for their actions."


Interesting. This facility was installed in cars without the owners permission or knowledge. It was done so the manufacturers could defend themselves against malicious liability claims, though this has never happened in reality. There is no requirement to check the accuracy or calibration of the black box data. How the hell can this be used as evidence.

I think Top Gear should do a feature on which cars have black box style chips in them. May affect your purchasing decision

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 08:29 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 13:55
Posts: 2247
Location: middlish
Gizmo wrote:
Interesting. This facility was installed in cars without the owners permission or knowledge. It was done so the manufacturers could defend themselves against malicious liability claims, though this has never happened in reality. There is no requirement to check the accuracy or calibration of the black box data. How the hell can this be used as evidence.

I think Top Gear should do a feature on which cars have black box style chips in them. May affect your purchasing decision


whats your source for the italicised bit... cos its not in the above article.

most of the data they are looking to pull is, as the article says, incidental in the systems fitted to the car through customer demand.

oh.. and top gear?? :lol: not exactly doing themselves any favours as a sensible source of consumer advice are they!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 09:03 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 22:02
Posts: 3266
ALL cars with air bags cary this data logging, If you trigger the air bag the data is stored.

I too was under the impression that it was so the manufacturer had proof that the car crassed and then the air bag went off rather than the aibag fired off and then I crashed.

_________________
Speed limit sign radio interview. TV Snap Unhappy
“It has never been the rule in this country – I hope it never will be - that suspected criminal offences must automatically be the subject of prosecution” He added that there should be a prosecution: “wherever it appears that the offence or the circumstances of its commission is or are of such a character that a prosecution in respect thereof is required in the public interest”
This approach has been endorsed by Attorney General ever since 1951. CPS Code


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 09:39 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 18:54
Posts: 4036
Location: Cumbria
Yes, that's my understanding of it too - a butt-covering exercise by the manufacturers. I believe some of the more upmarket cars can record a fair amount of data - lateral acceleration, throttle position, steering wheel angle and so on. all the Electronic stability programmes need this sort of information.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 10:36 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 00:15
Posts: 5232
Location: Windermere
The "butt covering" excersise as you describe it, is forced upon the manufacturers by different legal processes found in certain countries.

Years ago, motorcycle manufacturers used to install hinged seats which allowed convenient access and storage to parts of the bike.
Then some idiot came off his bike because he failed to fasten the seat down firmly, and successfully sued the manufacturer.
Since then it appears to have been policy to have all seats BOLTED down, so you need a tool kit to access the area below, instead of the ignition key! :x
I believe a similar event occured when an idiot put water in the fuel tank of his plane, in spite of the written warning to check the water and fuel inlets before proceeding.
The manufacturer was sued for not ensuring an idiot proof system was in place!! :x

And in which country do you think this is prevelant? :shock:
I suppose I would be quite happy to have the data available, because I dont think it would prove me guilty, and may even work in my favour.
I WOULD however wish to ensure that the data was accurate - and I suspect there is some difficulty here in ensuring it remains so. :oops:

_________________
Time to take responsibility for our actions.. and don't be afraid of speaking out!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 14:06 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 18:54
Posts: 4036
Location: Cumbria
Surely you don't mean the country where you could buy a car with a huge heavy engine behind the rear axle and sue the manufacturer because it's tail-happy?! :wink:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 15:32 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
ed_m wrote:
whats your source for the italicised bit... cos its not in the above article.


I was involved in the development of an engine management system about 5 years ago. It was for an OEM. Because of litigation from customers who were suing for crashes they claimed were due to vehicle faults, they decided to incorporate flash memory to record about 20 seconds (rolling). It stops recording a couple of seconds after the air bag sensor detected an crash. At the time we were sworn to secrecy because of possible of effect on customers knowing this technology was on-board. Now it is a standard across the industry. The on-cost to the manufacturer is about 20p per car.

Quote:
incidental in the systems fitted to the car through customer demand.


Bullshit!

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 18:51 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 13:55
Posts: 2247
Location: middlish
Gizmo wrote:

Quote:
incidental in the systems fitted to the car through customer demand.


Bullshit!


charming :roll:

if the car doesnt have esp then it seems unlikely you'll have yaw rate or latacc or steering angle unless its incidental in PAS system (not common on hydraulic).

i don't really have a problem with this data being deliberately logged (if indeed it is as prevalent as you make out) for litigation purposes, nor do i feel i have anything to fear if it is used post incident by the authorities.

not sure on the privacy issue, seems rather close to impounding the car for other forensic checks after the incident.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 21:26 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2004 11:05
Posts: 1044
Location: Hillingdon
ed_m wrote:
if the car doesnt have esp then it seems unlikely you'll have yaw rate or latacc or steering angle unless its incidental in PAS system (not common on hydraulic).


I think the point is, whilst the car does need to take readings of velocities, turn rates, G forces etc. etc in order for the various systems to operate properly, there's generally no need for these readings to be retained in non-volatile memory, and especially not to the level of detail being retained here - yeah, you might want to store peak/average values, but not every single sample from the last 20-30s of travel.

So OK, customer demand is probably responsible for the addition of all these funky new systems which require more extensive short-term datalogging capabilities, but customer demand is almost certainly NOT responsible for this data being retained beyond the point at which the systems actually need it, and in a form which can be used as an ad-hoc black box recording.

_________________
Chris


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 21:59 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
ed_m wrote:
not sure on the privacy issue, seems rather close to impounding the car for other forensic checks after the incident.


But one point made in the original article is that the data has to be downloaded by the manufacturer. Do you really trust the manufacturer to be impartial if there is potential litigation at stake. Remember the data is not "water marked" to make it tamper proof. It may be in their interests to make sure it is seen as driver error... :roll:

There is absolutely no reason why any data that is used to operate the vehicle systems (steering angle, brake operation, road speed, engine speed etc) needs to be stored for normal operation.

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 11:25 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 16:12
Posts: 1040
Location: West Midlands
It doesn't have to be downloaded by the manufacturer, the Police Accident Investigation Team are quite capable of plugging a laptop into the diagnostic port and downloading the necessary data. I can't remember where I saw it, but an Impreza driver was convicted for dangerous driving as the download from the cars computer proved that he was going too fast at the time of the accident.

Bugger - I have one of those!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 13:57 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
Rewolf wrote:
It doesn't have to be downloaded by the manufacturer, the Police Accident Investigation Team are quite capable of plugging a laptop into the diagnostic port and downloading the necessary data.


The information I am referring to is not accesable through the diagnostics port. In some cases it has to be extracted using specialised equipment plugged directly onto the PCB... :wink:

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 520 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.057s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]