Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Tue Oct 28, 2025 18:13

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 13:12 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
Quote:
The mission to cut fatal and serious accidents on Leicestershire's roads could take up to 20 years to accomplish, it emerged today.

It comes as figures showed 75 people died on city and county roads in 2006, compared with 61 during 2005.


Traffic bosses want to reduce the numbers of serious accidents by introducing traffic calming measures such as speed bumps, mini-roundabouts and warning signs to about 200 roads.

The idea is to reach Government targets to cut the number of people killed or seriously injured by 40 per cent and halve the number of children killed by 2010.

Councils prioritise traffic safety schemes based on the number of crashes in any road or area.

However, city council bosses say it could take 20 years to get to the bottom of its priority list of 111 areas.

Leicestershire County Council is looking at cutting accidents in up to 70 areas and introducing a number of other road safety schemes. It estimates that it would take 10 years to do it all. The county council hopes to deliver 20 of these schemes in the next year but its priority list is not yet available.

Council transport chiefs said today that limited funds meant they had to focus on the worst black spots first.

County council transport spokesman Nick Rushton assured residents that the long-term plan would make roads safer.

He said: "Our policy is to put schemes where they're needed most - it's a difficult balance, but we have to do the best we can with the money we've got."

Safety campaigners and police said it was not possible to make roads safer overnight.

They called on motorists to slow down in the meantime.

The Leicester City Council proposals will focus on schemes in 17 accident black spots from next year, some of which have already started.

Michael Jeeves, from the city council, said they were on target for reducing road deaths by 2010.

The road at the bottom of the city's priority list is Manor Park, in the Humberstone and Hamilton ward.

Ward councillor Stephen Thompson said traffic flow in the area was increasing and the calming measures needed to be introduced.

He said: "Clearly, this list will need to be reviewed.

"It's a very busy area with a lot of traffic, several schools and the large Tesco superstore nearby. There will certainly be a case for it to be put higher up the list."

About £2 million is being spent on various road safety schemes in the county this year, where there are more fatal crashes, with about £1 million spent in the city.

A Department for Transport spokeswoman said that it was up to councils to decide where to introduce traffic-calming schemes.

She said basing this decision on the number of accidents in a particular stretch of road was a "common-sense" approach.

She said: "It's the only way of judging how safe any road is."

Last week, the Government announced a £22 million investment to improve transport in Leicestershire in 2007/08.

Road safety measures will be among the areas funded by the cash, part of the Local Transport Capital Settlement given to local authorities each year.

* The full list of 111 roads will be published in the Leicester Mercury tomorrow.

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 13:23 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 14:06
Posts: 3654
Location: Oxfordshire
Quote:
Safety campaigners and police said it was not possible to make roads safer overnight.

They called on motorists to slow down in the meantime.


'The meantime' being until they can get a camera up to fleece them?

Quote:
She said basing this decision on the number of accidents in a particular stretch of road was a "common-sense" approach.

She said: "It's the only way of judging how safe any road is."


Not if they are taking individual, or pairs of years in isolation!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 13:37 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Gizmo wrote:
Quote:
Traffic bosses want to reduce the numbers of serious accidents by introducing traffic calming measures such as speed bumps, mini-roundabouts and warning signs to about 200 roads.


The medicine isn't working! Let's double the dose!

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 01:27 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Gizmo wrote:
Quote:
The mission to cut fatal and serious accidents on Leicestershire's roads could take up to 20 years to accomplish, it emerged today.

It comes as figures showed 75 people died on city and county roads in 2006, compared with 61 during 2005.


Where did this come from? Is there an online reference?

I want to add it to the 2006 fatalities sticky.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 08:26 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
feature

Its strange, I check the Leicester Constabulary on a regular basis and it was starting to look bad. Then they delayed putting the data on.....I was suspicious so I wrote to the Mercury saying that I thought it was starting to loog bad. On the same day the announcement came that deaths were up. Looks like they were stage managing the release of data.

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.015s | 10 Queries | GZIP : Off ]