Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Thu May 16, 2024 17:14

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 116 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 20:12 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
[quote="Bolton Headlines"
Bolton road charging plan 'is blackmail'
By Saiqa Chaudhari
Comment | Read Comments (45)

[/quote]

Most against.

Quote:

Will congestion charges help easy traffic jams? Tell Us in the Comment box below
BOLTON is being blackmailed into accepting controversial congestion charge proposals, a leading Tory MP has claimed.

Theresa Villiers was in the town yesterday to launch the local Conservative group's transport manifesto ahead of May's local elections.

Mrs Villiers, the Shadow Transport Secretary, said the Government was "coercing" local authorities into adopting a congestion charge to pay for improved transport.

"Some have accused the Government of blackmail. I do not think that is too strong a word," she said.

Reader Poll

Do you agree that Greater Manchester is being blackmailed into congestion charging?
Yes
No

"A decision on congestion charges should be made locally. There will be some places where a charge would work, but it is unfair of the Government to coerce councils into adopting a congestion charge to pay for improved transport."

AGMA - the Association of Greater Manchester Authorities - has lodged a £3 billion bid for Government cash to improve the area's transport infrastructure.

advertisement



Of that, around £2 billion would be in the form of a loan repayable by using the proceeds of a congestion charge.

Two zones have been earmarked - one for Manchester city centre and the other for the area inside of the M60.

Bolton Council signalled its support for the bid when the leader, Cllr Cliff Morris, signed it on behalf of the authority.

However, he has maintained that the ruling Labour party does not support a congestion charge for Bolton, which could be included in the second phase of any road charging programme introduced.

Last month, the Liberal Democrat group in Bolton tabled a motion which called for a borough-wide poll to gauge public opinion on the matter. It was given cross-party approval and will be held on a date to be decided.

Last night, Cllr Morris said all local authorities, including those controlled by the Conservatives, were bidding for funding and waiting for a decision.

He added: "The Government is not blackmailing us about anything. At the end of the day, the people of Bolton will decide. That is what I have always said."

Mrs Villiers was joined on her tour of Bolton by Cllr John Walsh. leader of the Conservative group in Bolton.

He vowed to carry out a comprehensive review of the borough's transport network to "bring it into the 21st century" if his party wins the local elections.

"The highway network is out of date and not suited to today's traffic," he said.

"We will examine the road network and public transport links - we have been promised an integrated train station and bus station since 1966.

"We will look at car parking and how it can help retailers by having limited free parking, together with pay on exit car parks. Pedestrian safety will also be a top priority. We will look at what we have in the coffers. We will deliver over a period after consultation.

"Congestion charging is not the answer to improved public transport. We will not, as with fuel duty, have another stealth tax on motorists."




Lop onto the site.. the locals are furious. My sisters are actively campaigning against.

_________________
If you want to get to heaven - you have to raise a little hell!

Smilies are contagious
They are just like the flu
We use our smilies on YOU today
Now Good Causes are smiling too!

KEEP SMILING
It makes folk wonder just what you REALLY got up to last night!

Smily to penny.. penny to pound
safespeed prospers-smiles all round! !

But the real message? SMILE.. GO ON ! DO IT! and the world will smile with you!
Enjoy life! You only have the one bite at it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 20:16 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
The poll is at 73% completely against the toll tax.. :popcorn: This wil be £10 when in place .. given inflation and a bust economy :popcorn: and the charge will not fund anything as a result .. but will land Manchester in debt when it cannot repay its loan as a result :popcorn:

_________________
If you want to get to heaven - you have to raise a little hell!

Smilies are contagious
They are just like the flu
We use our smilies on YOU today
Now Good Causes are smiling too!

KEEP SMILING
It makes folk wonder just what you REALLY got up to last night!

Smily to penny.. penny to pound
safespeed prospers-smiles all round! !

But the real message? SMILE.. GO ON ! DO IT! and the world will smile with you!
Enjoy life! You only have the one bite at it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 23:47 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 18:17
Posts: 794
Location: Reading
There's a link to the above story here. Strangely the poll seems to have disappeared; I hope this isn't because someone didn't like the way that it was going. Anyway please vote in it if it comes back (unless you're weepej, because I've got a funny feeling that he supports congestion charging, in spite of liking motorists so much).

I'm really pleased that the people of Manchester are standing up to this congestion charge nonsense, even though the government is trying to force it through with these highly dubious tactics. If charging is still implemented there despite the opposition, there's no hope for democracy in this country. If it's not implemented, maybe it'll be a turning point, and motorists will stop rolling over and accepting the persecution that they so often receive at the moment.

_________________
Paul Smith: a legend.

"The freedom provided by the motor vehicle is not universally applauded, however: there are those who resent the loss of state control over individual choice that the car represents. Such people rarely admit their prejudices openly; instead, they make false or exaggerated claims about the adverse effects of road transport in order to justify calls for higher taxation or restrictions on mobility." (Conservative Way Forward: Stop The War Against Drivers)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 02:14 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2004 03:58
Posts: 267
Location: west yorks
Poll here.

http://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/news/bol ... harges.php

_________________
nigel_bytes


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 03:49 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 18:17
Posts: 794
Location: Reading
nigel_bytes wrote:

Thanks.

Oh look, it's gone down from 73% to 67% in a few hours. I think the cycling forum trolls might just have found the poll; we know from past experience that they like to vote more than once each in online polls in order to pretend that the public supports congestion charging, cameras etc. Pathetic, predictable, dishonest...the usual in other words.

_________________
Paul Smith: a legend.

"The freedom provided by the motor vehicle is not universally applauded, however: there are those who resent the loss of state control over individual choice that the car represents. Such people rarely admit their prejudices openly; instead, they make false or exaggerated claims about the adverse effects of road transport in order to justify calls for higher taxation or restrictions on mobility." (Conservative Way Forward: Stop The War Against Drivers)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 19:54 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
bombus wrote:
nigel_bytes wrote:

Thanks.

Oh look, it's gone down from 73% to 67% in a few hours. I think the cycling forum trolls might just have found the poll; we know from past experience that they like to vote more than once each in online polls in order to pretend that the public supports congestion charging, cameras etc. Pathetic, predictable, dishonest...the usual in other words.


Back up to nearly 75%

_________________
The world runs on oil, period. No other substance can compete when it comes to energy density, flexibility, ease of handling, ease of transportation. If oil didn’t exist we would have to invent it.”

56 years after it was decided it was needed, the Bedford Bypass is nearing completion. The last single carriageway length of it.We have the most photogenic mayor though, always being photographed doing nothing


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2008 21:16 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6735
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
I see that Cllr Roger Jones, chief architect of the scheme, lost his seat in yesterday's elections :D :bounce1: :lol:
Quote:
Opponents of the congestion charge bid said Mr Jones' demise should be seen as a warning. Sean Corker, of Manchester Against Road Tolls, said: "This result proves beyond doubt that the congestion charge is a cast-iron vote loser."

Also see ABD press release.

The fact the Conservatives have taken overall control of Bury will further strengthen opposition to the scheme.

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 02, 2008 22:29 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 18:17
Posts: 794
Location: Reading
Yeah, saw that. Great news.

I get the impression that he and the other congestion charge advocates (not just in Manchester) always knew perfectly well that people didn't want congestion charging. However they've been trying to force it on us anyway, for their own selfish reasons, presumably thinking that even though people didn't want it, it wouldn't be enough of an issue come election time.

How wrong they were. Perhaps now they'll realise that, however much they would rather not, they have to abide by the will of the people. They shouldn't have a problem with that FFS, they're our elected representatives, and if they hate the idea of serving us so much then they shouldn't be in politics. They should be keen to do what we want, not railroad through their own ideology (especially when it's cranky anti-car nonsense). We're in charge, not them, and the last 24 hours have shown that very nicely. All we need now to round things off is for Boris to win in London, which is looking pretty likely, although I won't dare to start celebrating until it's definite.

_________________
Paul Smith: a legend.

"The freedom provided by the motor vehicle is not universally applauded, however: there are those who resent the loss of state control over individual choice that the car represents. Such people rarely admit their prejudices openly; instead, they make false or exaggerated claims about the adverse effects of road transport in order to justify calls for higher taxation or restrictions on mobility." (Conservative Way Forward: Stop The War Against Drivers)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 03, 2008 23:33 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
Lobbying councillors - especially after the ring leader of this scheme lost his seat would be a very good idea. They are the folk who will make the decisions - even if some of them are a slice short of a full loaf :wink:

I think from what my sisters say that the Manchester MART group need to establish exactly what these proposals are.

From the initial report in Feb 2007's "MEN" - they intend to extend the tram from Manchester to Leigh . .. via Eccles. What they did not say and which seems to be the case from various leaks and rumours around the region is that the old railway line as closed by Beeching and now a SUSTRANS CYCLING ROUTE 55 would become the new tram line :banghead:

A LOSS then to CYCLISTS and both my sisters say you can get from the outskirts of Bolton to Monton via this route in 25 minutes - including the daft barrier underneath the A580 bridge :banghead:

Not a green plan then.. but wait .. I seem to recall reading that the ex but not at all lamented Mayor said that the congestion charge was not a "planet saving matter .. but a congestion resolving matter".,.. only :scratchchin: it has not cut congestion when London still moves more slowly than other capitals in Europe per the stats and still has more congestion to boot.

_________________
If you want to get to heaven - you have to raise a little hell!

Smilies are contagious
They are just like the flu
We use our smilies on YOU today
Now Good Causes are smiling too!

KEEP SMILING
It makes folk wonder just what you REALLY got up to last night!

Smily to penny.. penny to pound
safespeed prospers-smiles all round! !

But the real message? SMILE.. GO ON ! DO IT! and the world will smile with you!
Enjoy life! You only have the one bite at it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 01:40 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 01:16
Posts: 917
Location: Northern England
..........I'm just left wondering. Wondering why is it that (according to the statement) we motorists have to pay for the cost of Public Transport when all the Public transport in Manchester is Privately owned!

Forgive me, but I thought that funding was the private operators job.............


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 09:45 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
Amazing. The prime mover is ousted at the polls. The public don't want it. The local politicians see £1.2BN and roll over.

Ask how much money will be spent on improving the roads? Nil. because all the government cash will be spent on setting up the scheme and employing consultants and a new swathe of civil servants.

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 14:52 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
Aha.
It is to be a "new" con charge.
Only charging people during rush times.
So shoppers outside those times will not [yeah] pay a charge.
Until the times get changed.
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/transport/article4083454.ece

_________________
The world runs on oil, period. No other substance can compete when it comes to energy density, flexibility, ease of handling, ease of transportation. If oil didn’t exist we would have to invent it.”

56 years after it was decided it was needed, the Bedford Bypass is nearing completion. The last single carriageway length of it.We have the most photogenic mayor though, always being photographed doing nothing


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 16:26 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon May 07, 2007 14:05
Posts: 498
To me this is even worse than a blanket fee (in a way) "Yes... yes we are only going to charge those who are trying to make their way to work during the rush hour, in order to earn a living and contribute to the economy - don't worry though, those of you not working can travel to the post office to pick up your benefits cheque outside of rush hour free of charge :)"


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 16:27 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
The benefit cheque made way for the direct payment to account.

_________________
The world runs on oil, period. No other substance can compete when it comes to energy density, flexibility, ease of handling, ease of transportation. If oil didn’t exist we would have to invent it.”

56 years after it was decided it was needed, the Bedford Bypass is nearing completion. The last single carriageway length of it.We have the most photogenic mayor though, always being photographed doing nothing


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 17:59 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon May 07, 2007 14:05
Posts: 498
jomukuk wrote:
The benefit cheque made way for the direct payment to account.


So they dont even have to work their muscels to get paid now? Blimey


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 02:06 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
The only person who LIVES on benefits is the one also working and not declaring. people like drug dealers. The system is run for the "benefit" of those who can lie, and for the benefit of those who are employed within it. Tell the truth in your claim and you will get shafted.
There are, to my current knowledge, some 800+ different types of benefit you may be able to claim. This is made slightly more complex by the fact that some types of benefit are only claimable if you are in receipt of another benefit. Strangely, those who earned a good wage when working are unable to claim free prescriptions or free dental care. Now, if you can get onto incapacity benefit you are really rolling...because incapacity benefit is not means tested. So you can have savings of over 8 grand and still get everything, along with c/tax benefit.

_________________
The world runs on oil, period. No other substance can compete when it comes to energy density, flexibility, ease of handling, ease of transportation. If oil didn’t exist we would have to invent it.”

56 years after it was decided it was needed, the Bedford Bypass is nearing completion. The last single carriageway length of it.We have the most photogenic mayor though, always being photographed doing nothing


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 19:37 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/site/article/5338/

_________________
The world runs on oil, period. No other substance can compete when it comes to energy density, flexibility, ease of handling, ease of transportation. If oil didn’t exist we would have to invent it.”

56 years after it was decided it was needed, the Bedford Bypass is nearing completion. The last single carriageway length of it.We have the most photogenic mayor though, always being photographed doing nothing


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 08:36 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/ ... an_blocked



New York was proposing something similar. Common sense apparently prevailed. You see Mancunians already have discussed alternative routes avoiding the charged roads (more later from the Salford Advertiser when I track down the story or find a link to it...(Have e-mail scan of it.. which is the normal crooked one Jazz sends me as she "claims multi-taskin'" :lol:) - will take a lot of cropping to tidy .. :roll:)

but anyway the big bone of contention was the traffic jams it would cause OUTSIDE the zone.

We already do have accounts from when Jazz was getting signatures for a referendum in Westhoughton. Some shoppers live in nearby Atherton and they all expressed worries about the proposed Park and Ride car park which would effectively make their currently quiet road into a heavy trafficked one all day long as folk head for this car park. These are not like Oxford, York, Canterbury and Chester where the park and rides are closer to the business park hub-lands. These are ear marked for busy residentials... from the map in the MEN .. and other local press.


http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/ ... stion_plan

Quote:
New York chief hails congestion plan
Caroline Jack
12/ 6/2008

NEW York's chief jambuster has claimed Greater Manchester's congestion charge plans could prove a model for the rest of the world.

Tom Maguire, director of congestion mitigation in America's biggest city, was speaking during a visit to Manchester yesterday.

His comments followed an announcement by transport secretary Ruth Kelly that Manchester's tram, bus and rail network would receive £3bn of improvements - provided a peak-hour congestion charge of up to £5 a day was introduced.

Mr Maguire, who played a key role in shaping similar plans in New York, said the combination of investment and the charge could be the key to its success.

"This plan is a real opportunity for Manchester to be a leader in transport planning," he told the MEN. "I do not want to be too quick to pass judgment on cities which I don't know too well, but I think this plan could work here.

"What makes it special is the fact it is a comprehensive package, with all aspects of public transport considered."

Mr Maguire was in Manchester to speak at the tmap - traffic management and parking - conference 2008, and exchange ideas with transport experts from Greater Manchester.

The region is about to start 12 weeks of consultation on the proposals from government before deciding whether to accept the charge-plus-investment package.

Mr Maguire has faced his own battles in New York, where plans for a congestion charge were recently vetoed. The scheme was approved by New York City leaders, but overturned at state level.

"There are eight million people living in New York, but only five per cent of them drive into the city," said Mr Maguire. "I believe it was those drivers who were listened to by the state over and above anyone else."

Mr Maguire said a congestion charge for New York was not yet dead in the water, and said he would continue to push for state approval.

Traffic

"All the problems of congestion are still there," he said. "Traffic keeps getting worse, and that will happen in other cities including Manchester."

Mr Maguire later spoke to around 350 transport and parking experts, who gathered at the Bridgewater Hall to discuss and share transport practices.

Key themes were changing people's attitudes to car usage, improving bus route coverage and making use of existing road networks with schemes such as car sharing lanes.

Mr Maguire's message focused not just on congestion charging, but on improving and properly linking a variety of transport options such as cycle networks, bus services and on-site parking.

Sir Howard Bernstein, chief executive of Manchester council , opened proceedings with a clear meassage that Manchester's economy could only grow with the introduction of a pay-to-drive policy.

He said: "As our economy grows and grows, we need a step change.

"Monday's announcement means we can now promote a serious debate - it has significance for the country as a whole and even internationally. We are being radical, but I know we are doing the right thing."




Really Mr Bernstein.. We hear many businesses have changed minds about locating to Manchester .. and rumours that some will re-locate because the charge will mean paying the staff more so they can afford to get to work...

By the way.. Nurse at Hope .. Her kids go to school just within the zone. There's apparently no bus .. nor likely to be one as the last one was deemed "not viable". It will cost her £10 to take them .. Then there is the chap whose kids go to the Velodrome to train as cyclists. These are youngsters aged 10 -13 years. It's a bit far to expect them to ride there from Horwich/Chorley border.. and they go straight from school .. hitting the con charge on the evening entry.

_________________
If you want to get to heaven - you have to raise a little hell!

Smilies are contagious
They are just like the flu
We use our smilies on YOU today
Now Good Causes are smiling too!

KEEP SMILING
It makes folk wonder just what you REALLY got up to last night!

Smily to penny.. penny to pound
safespeed prospers-smiles all round! !

But the real message? SMILE.. GO ON ! DO IT! and the world will smile with you!
Enjoy life! You only have the one bite at it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 08:47 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/ ... id_bonkers


Quote:
Congestion charge bid 'bonkers'
David Ottewell
12/ 5/2008

A SENIOR Labour backbencher has said it would be 'bonkers' to have a congestion charge in Greater Manchester.

Graham Stringer, MP for Manchester Blackley, spoke out during a debate on the Local Transport Bill in the Commons.

He claimed plans for a congestion charge of up to £5 a day had been shrouded in secrecy and said consultation on the scheme had been 'a sham'.

Mr Stringer, right, also warned that the bill, likely to become law later this year, would strip individual councils of their right to veto congestion charge plans.

His outburst came as transport minister Rosie Winterton refused to back calls for local referendums to be made a legal requirement before congestion charging is introduced.

Mr Stringer claimed the government wanted `to look at Manchester as an experiment in congestion charging, after withdrawing support for a national road-pricing scheme'.

"For my government and for my party in control of four local authorities in Greater Manchester, to introduce a tax now on top of other taxes is, quite frankly, bonkers," he said.

Greater Manchester's 10 councils have submitted a joint bid for a congestion charge in return for £3bn of investment in public transport. They are likely to hear later this month whether they have been successful.

Councils

The bid has proved hugely divisive and three councils - Tory-run Trafford and Bury, and Lib Dem-held Stockport - have withdrawn their support.

Mr Stringer said the case that had been made for a congestion charge in Greater Manchester was `very dodgy'.

"When the Manchester bid was put in, the consultation was a sham," he said. "The bids so far have not been transparent. When I put Freedom of Information requests to the Department for Transport to find out what the correspondence between the Greater Manchester authorities and the DfT has been, I was told it was commercially sensitive.

"How is it commercially sensitive? People have a right to know."

Currently, Greater Manchester's 10 councils have agreed a voting system that means if at least seven councils give their blessing, the congestion charge bid would be introduced across the region.

But that is a convention rather than a legally-binding rule - and there is nothing stopping Trafford, Bury and Stockport refusing to co-operate.



144 comments on the story. Few show enthusiasm for this toll tax. :popcorn:

Jazz and Julie are working on lobbying the final council. They do need some help though .. so .. Manchester lurks out there -

do go visit the MART site and the "stopthecharge" site to find out what YOU can do to help fight this .. :hissyfit: :hoppingmad:

_________________
If you want to get to heaven - you have to raise a little hell!

Smilies are contagious
They are just like the flu
We use our smilies on YOU today
Now Good Causes are smiling too!

KEEP SMILING
It makes folk wonder just what you REALLY got up to last night!

Smily to penny.. penny to pound
safespeed prospers-smiles all round! !

But the real message? SMILE.. GO ON ! DO IT! and the world will smile with you!
Enjoy life! You only have the one bite at it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 08:53 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/ ... tep_closer

Quote:
C-charge a step closer
David Ottewell
9/ 6/2008


A WAR of words erupted today as the way was cleared for Greater Manchester to introduce a congestion charge.

Transport minister Rosie Winterton was visiting the region to confirm the success of the bid to spend £3bn revolutionising trams, trains and buses.

But that will only happen if Greater Manchester signs up for a peak-hour congestion charge - at up to £5 a day - stretching as far as the M60.

It would be the country's biggest road-pricing scheme and the first in any major city outside London. Graham Stringer, MP for Manchester Blackley, said the charge was `politically and economically' a bad idea.

He said: "This is an experiment for the government but it is not an experiment for us.

"It is fundamentally changing the nature of the Greater Manchester economy so that billions of pounds have to be taken out of a relatively small number of pockets."

But Tony Lloyd, MP for Manchester Central, said congestion was holding back the local economy, adding that without the charge some 30,000 new jobs could be lost to the region.

And Sir Richard Leese - leader of Manchester council - said the combined investment-plus-charge package was `very clearly in the long-term interests of the conurbation'.

Permission

The M.E.N. revealed on Saturday that the government was going to announce today that it had accepted Greater Manchester's bid to the transport innovation fund (TIF). The bid was for £1.2bn in grant cash, plus permission to borrow £1.8bn more against 30 years' proceeds from the charge.

Ministers made clear TIF was conditional on towns and cities being prepared to introduce local road pricing schemes. Apart from Greater Manchester only Cambridgeshire has lodged a formal bid.

The charge itself would require motorists to fit special tags to their car windscreens, which would be electronically scanned.

There would be two charging `rings' - one around the M60 and one nearer the city centre - with motorists charged only if they travelled in certain directions at peak hours. Vehicles would pay more for passing through both rings, up to a maximum of £5 a day.

The charge would not be introduced until late 2012 when most of the transport improvements - including the extension of the Metrolink to the airport, Trafford Centre and Oldham and Rochdale town centres - should be complete.

The government's announcement, will trigger a 12-week public consultation. The 10 councils of Greater Manchester will then vote on whether to accept the deal - with current rules requiring seven to say yes if it is to go ahead.

Labour-run Manchester, Salford, Wigan and Tameside are in favour, as are Lib Dem-held Rochdale, and Oldham, where no party has a majority. Trafford and Bury - controlled by the Tories - are against, as is Lib Dem-run Stockport. Bolton has pledged a local referendum.

Sean Corker, of pressure group Manchester Against Road Tolls, said: "Gordon Brown and (Transport Secretary) Ruth Kelly are announcing a new motoring tax when there is growing unrest over increases in existing motoring costs."




Again the volley of reader comments do not show the good folk of Manchester welcome this move. :popcorn:


I am putting the press stories seen in order they appeared .. so we can follow the tale of woe properly.

_________________
If you want to get to heaven - you have to raise a little hell!

Smilies are contagious
They are just like the flu
We use our smilies on YOU today
Now Good Causes are smiling too!

KEEP SMILING
It makes folk wonder just what you REALLY got up to last night!

Smily to penny.. penny to pound
safespeed prospers-smiles all round! !

But the real message? SMILE.. GO ON ! DO IT! and the world will smile with you!
Enjoy life! You only have the one bite at it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 116 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.047s | 13 Queries | GZIP : Off ]