Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Tue Apr 28, 2026 03:35

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 44 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Ladyman on Top Gear
PostPosted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 22:04 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member

Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 15:49
Posts: 393
So, did anyone see Ladyman's appearance on Top Gear tonight? He trotted out the usual line about cameras saving lives, Clarkson made some good points that we've seen on here a few times, and got the usual replies.

I got the sense that Dr Ladyman doesn't really believe in cameras himself but is having to tow the party line.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 22:08 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
I fed Top Gear all the important information in preparation for the Ladyman interview. They asked me for camera information and I sent them about 10 carefully prepared pages of information and issues.

Did you hear Clarkson start on the RTTM story? But he just trailed off.

What a wasted opportunity. :(

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 22:26 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 22:02
Posts: 3266
you will have to go on your self... how is your fastest lap?

_________________
Speed limit sign radio interview. TV Snap Unhappy
“It has never been the rule in this country – I hope it never will be - that suspected criminal offences must automatically be the subject of prosecution” He added that there should be a prosecution: “wherever it appears that the offence or the circumstances of its commission is or are of such a character that a prosecution in respect thereof is required in the public interest”
This approach has been endorsed by Attorney General ever since 1951. CPS Code


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 22:26 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 09:59
Posts: 3544
Location: Shropshire
SafeSpeed wrote:
I fed Top Gear all the important information in preparation for the Ladyman interview. They asked me for camera information and I sent them about 10 carefully prepared pages of information and issues.


I'm not sure they really saw it as an 'interview', more of a chat with a chance to put him on the spot over a contentious issue. Thats sound-bite entertainment TV for you <shrug>

SafeSpeed wrote:
Did you hear Clarkson start on the RTTM story? But he just trailed off.

What a wasted opportunity. :(


Most of the audience wouldn't even have realised what he was on about. And they had the 'lap in a reasonably priced car' to get onto which is the prime reason for that segment of the show. As I said, this is a light entertainment show, not investigative journalism, a serious debate on speed cameras was never really likely to break out.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 22:29 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Rigpig wrote:
SafeSpeed wrote:
I fed Top Gear all the important information in preparation for the Ladyman interview. They asked me for camera information and I sent them about 10 carefully prepared pages of information and issues.


I'm not sure they really saw it as an 'interview', more of a chat with a chance to put him on the spot over a contentious issue.


That's definitely not the way the researcher I was dealing with saw it. We talked again and again about a golden opportunity.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 22:34 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
anton wrote:
you will have to go on your self... how is your fastest lap?


I'd be glad to if invited. In fact I'd agree like a shot. But I'm not a 'star' am I? Give me a couple more years at this rate.

Fastest lap? Should be OK I think. :)

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 22:45 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 22:21
Posts: 925
Yes it's such a shame that RTTM was missed out, as I really don't think it's a difficult concept to grasp. I also agree that I don't think Ladyman really believes they work, but will not bring the whole thing crashing down and so toes the party line.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 22:52 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 00:45
Posts: 1016
Location: Mighty Tamworth
I thought clarkson did well, because in the end Ladyman had to resort to. If you don't break the speed limit, then whats your problem.

_________________
Oct 11 Birmingham Half Marathon. I am running for the British Heart Foundation.
http://www.justgiving.com/Rob-Taylor


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 23:12 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 00:11
Posts: 764
Location: Sofa
Ladyman seems pretty sure that the new report will back the scammers claims that they are effective. :scratchchin:

_________________
Less Kodak, more Kojak.
In times of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 23:29 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 22:02
Posts: 3266
I think it went well for an entertainment program. You could issue a press release asking why ladyman still hasn't issued the fourth report. The acid test on the program will be the office chat monday morning.

I thought ladyman lost the argument on the "cameras are working " question.

And the rest of the government didn't know he was going on. :reaper:

and he has 9 points (6 more than me!) :reaper:

He also
mentioned he'd suggested his wife takes his points
OOP's admitting considering perverting the course
of justice on national TV.
:reaper:

EDIT: there was also that bit about the Aston Martin being able to stop in half the official stoping distance :

It would be good to type in a transcript of the program so it becomes long term record

(so it can be quoted back at him)

I think it went better than you perceived

_________________
Speed limit sign radio interview. TV Snap Unhappy
“It has never been the rule in this country – I hope it never will be - that suspected criminal offences must automatically be the subject of prosecution” He added that there should be a prosecution: “wherever it appears that the offence or the circumstances of its commission is or are of such a character that a prosecution in respect thereof is required in the public interest”
This approach has been endorsed by Attorney General ever since 1951. CPS Code


Last edited by anton on Mon Nov 28, 2005 08:32, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 23:48 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 00:24
Posts: 2400
Location: Kendal, Cumbria
I thought Clarkson "got 'im" when he pointed out he had a clean licence, thus completely wiping out Ladyman's line of attack about vested interests, and him being on 9 points made him look a bit awkward.

I also felt there was a nice undercurrent of hypocrisy there, when this clown is telling us speed cameras are good for us and is then shown exiting backwards into the scenery!

But yes, I couldn't believe the way that JC let him off the hook on the RTTM thing - I can only conclude that he didn't fully understand the concept himself and thus didn't spot the opportunity that was handed to him on a plate, when Ladyman stated in response to the RTTM question that 4 KSIs were needed to justify a camera. That precisely proved the point, and if he'd pointed that out he'd have nailed him!

Whilst it seemed like SL was very "brave" going on Top Gear, on reflection I think it was more of a case of a desperate act to try and win the PR battle, in fact he more or less admitted they've lost the fight!

_________________
CSCP Latin for beginners...
Ticketo ergo sum : I scam therefore I am!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 23:51 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0, ... 95,00.html

Road safety minister dents his pride in high-speed Top Gear crash

Viewers of Top Gear can watch the road safety minister showing off his driving skills tonight — as he spins off a test track at 80mph.

Stephen Ladyman crashed into a wall of tyres while taking part in the BBC2 show’s Star In A Reasonably Priced Car section, in which celebrities do a timed circuit in a Suzuki Liana saloon.

“He lifted his foot off the accelerator at the wrong moment,” says presenter Jeremy Clarkson. “It was very funny to watch the road safety minister reversing into a pile of tyres.”

Ladyman, who normally drives an Alfa Romeo 156 and once had nine points on his licence, won’t reveal exactly what happened but admits: “Their car is not worth quite as much as it was when I got into it. I was too frightened to look at the speedometer.” In a previous series, a blind driver successfully completed the circuit.

Despite being referred to by Top Gear as Ladyboy, the minister defends Clarkson from his critics. “Jeremy isn’t encouraging people to break the speed limit,” he says. “He hasn’t even had any speeding tickets. I think the Liberal Democrats and the environmental people who have a pop at him are too precious, to be frank.”

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 23:53 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
JT wrote:
But yes, I couldn't believe the way that JC let him off the hook on the RTTM thing - I can only conclude that he didn't fully understand the concept himself and thus didn't spot the opportunity that was handed to him on a plate...


:yesyes:

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 23:55 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
anton wrote:
and he has 9 points (6 more than me!) :reaper:


I think he was on 6 points not long ago, down from 9. So he has picked up another three recently. Has he?

anton wrote:
It would be good to type in a transcript of the program so it becomes long term record


Absolutely. Anyone? Pretty please!

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 00:30 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 16:34
Posts: 923
Location: UK
anton wrote:
and he has 9 points (6 more than me!) :reaper:

Clarkson's retort about a clean licence was excellent, I am surprised Ladyman didn't go red at any point, must be an essential thing in an MP's training! If I was him I would snap back with "well you are just better than me at not getting caught"

anton wrote:
He also
mentioned he'd suggested his wife takes his points
OOP's admitting considering perverting the course
of justice on national TV.

Yes, I was very surprised, I wouldn't expect him to have treated it in that way, I would expect a jokey remark and then a comment that it would be a serious criminal offence and that it should never be done, but he actually joined in the joke and didn't make any other comment.

Very Naughty, not just for him to effectively condone it but to perpetuate the myth that it is something that is not treated extremely seriously by the police.

The SCP's give one appearance of not caring who takes the points, but when a 9-pointer (such as Ladyman) nominates somebody else as the driver they then seem to take a much closer interest...

Gareth


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 00:33 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 16:34
Posts: 923
Location: UK
SafeSpeed wrote:
Absolutely. Anyone? Pretty please!

Before somebody wears their fingers out let me see if I can find some subtitle logging software and run it during the repeat....


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 00:51 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 11:19
Posts: 1795
Clarkson started the RTTM but Ladyman basically interrupted him and steered him away from it I felt. I don't think it was entirely down to JC. I could tell Ladyboy was squirming anyway. I found his admission of how only stupid people get caught because the cameras are orange etc quite amusing. Best bit was to see that gatso go off on the track and he didn't even notice :twisted:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 00:56 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 00:24
Posts: 2400
Location: Kendal, Cumbria
teabelly wrote:
Clarkson started the RTTM but Ladyman basically interrupted him and steered him away from it I felt. I don't think it was entirely down to JC. I could tell Ladyboy was squirming anyway. I found his admission of how only stupid people get caught because the cameras are orange etc quite amusing. Best bit was to see that gatso go off on the track and he didn't even notice :twisted:

...and then he said it wasn't a forward facing camera so how could they tell it was him. You could almost hear the collective groan from all the GATSO-owning scamera managers around the nation, as they anticipate a corresponding blip in the numbers of s172 defences...

_________________
CSCP Latin for beginners...
Ticketo ergo sum : I scam therefore I am!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 00:57 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 15:00
Posts: 1109
Location: Can't see.
I thought clarkson was quite hard on him, for what top gear is, a light entertainment show. not saying he shouldn't have torn him to shreds, just that it wasn't going to happen there and then and I was quite suprised he went as far as he did, but the usual politician bullcrap waffle wore him down.

all in all, I did get the impression there was a real person underneath smothered by political ambitions/pension concerns resulting in just another yes man doing and saying what he's told, feathering his own nest and f*ck everyone trodden on the way.

_________________
Fear is a weapon of mass distraction


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 08:23 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 22:02
Posts: 3266
RTTM is for decision makers, times telegraph and radio 4. It has its place! You might get it in the express and mail. It is not for sun, star and Mirror readers and those who don't do maths. Don't expect to get that concept over to more than 30% of the public.

70% of the public don't understand the interest rate on their credit card. The same people won't understand RTTM.

(RTTM may have been above Ladyman! he couldn’t understand the other data?)

It was Jezza Clarkson not Paxman after all. He bottled out and lifted on the corner.

_________________
Speed limit sign radio interview. TV Snap Unhappy
“It has never been the rule in this country – I hope it never will be - that suspected criminal offences must automatically be the subject of prosecution” He added that there should be a prosecution: “wherever it appears that the offence or the circumstances of its commission is or are of such a character that a prosecution in respect thereof is required in the public interest”
This approach has been endorsed by Attorney General ever since 1951. CPS Code


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 44 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.051s | 10 Queries | GZIP : Off ]