Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Fri Apr 24, 2026 18:01

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 43 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: M42
PostPosted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 12:57 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 21:19
Posts: 1059
I heard a rumour that the HADECs (enforcement cameras for the VSL) will be enforcing at VSL+2mph and also the NSL when the variable limits aren't in operation.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 13:12 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 00:01
Posts: 2258
Location: South Wales
If that rumour were true, I should have had a NIP by now.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 13:19 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 21:19
Posts: 1059
They're not live yet...


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 15:23 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 19:50
Posts: 3369
Location: Lost in the Wilderness
mpaton2004 wrote:
They're not live yet...


This has been discussed in another thread here, I thought the cameras where now live when the manditory limits where displayed. I've emailed the highways agency to try and find out, I'll post if I get a reply. Also when you look at the Highways agency web page it also mentions ANPR, I’m wondering where these are mounted?

_________________
Useless laws weaken necessary laws.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 16:57 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
I was on the M42 the other day. Showed a congestion warning and a 40 limit. Drove down it the whole length of the restriction. No congestion in sight. :x

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 27, 2006 12:23 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:30
Posts: 2053
Location: South Wales (Roving all UK)
The whole this is a white elephant...congestion is worse, enforced limits when the road is clear and 60/50mph signs that are difficult to distinguish apart!

rubbish


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 27, 2006 15:20 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 00:01
Posts: 2258
Location: South Wales
A bit of devils advocate here but the whole idea of these bloody things is that they slow down traffic to stop 70mph traffic ploughing into the back of a jam and coming to a screeching halt.

Therefore if the system is working you won't see the jam because it will have cleared just before you get there (assuming you enter the reduced speed limit just as it starts being enforced)

The theory is sound, whether the control centres can actually make it work is a different matter. Every time those signs are flashing 60 and you are stuck in a queue doing 30, the operators have failed.

In orther words, they cock it up every morning and evening. :)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 27, 2006 15:46 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:30
Posts: 2053
Location: South Wales (Roving all UK)
The reason I don't see a jam is because theres no real traffic but someone hasn't reverted to NSL.

The times when there is traffic there are jams.

I don't believe they will ever work.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 27, 2006 16:41 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 09:01
Posts: 1548
Lum wrote:
The theory is sound, whether the control centres can actually make it work is a different matter. Every time those signs are flashing 60 and you are stuck in a queue doing 30, the operators have failed.

In orther words, they cock it up every morning and evening. :)

You got it in one.
It's already common knowledge that if you see the 40 on the M25, then the traffic is not even moving.

_________________
What makes you think I'm drunk officer, have I got a fat bird with me?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 27, 2006 18:16 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member

Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 13:50
Posts: 2643
Lum wrote:
Therefore if the system is working you won't see the jam because it will have cleared just before you get there (assuming you enter the reduced speed limit just as it starts being enforced)


I can't see how it can possibly work.
You seldom get a situation where a fast traffic stream happens upon a jam, there normally being a fairly steady flow - give or take. For it to work there needs to be a rolling roadblock - ie you slow down, but everyone ahead of you carries on at normal speed. Then, if you've built up enough of a gap, the jam may have had time to dissipate by the time you get there - although the cars which were ahead of you before you slowed down will have caught up with the jam and so will have had to stop. But how do you control that, as it depends on one person slowing down and everyone ahead continuing at normal speed? And this has to be over some distance in order to create an appreciable gap.
And even if you could control it, I still can't see it working because, if the jam was caused by anything more serious than the traffic simply slowing down then it's going to take longer than several minutes to dissipate - which means that the rolling roadblock will have to be over tens of miles to be effective. On the other hand, if the jam was caused by the traffic simply slowing down, then there's a high risk that a rolling roadblock is simply going to create more of the same kind of jam behind it.

_________________
Only when ideology, prejudice and dogma are set aside does the truth emerge - Kepler


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: M42
PostPosted: Tue Mar 28, 2006 13:36 
Offline
Suspended
Suspended

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 14:55
Posts: 364
Location: Ignoring the mental pygmies (and there are a lot of them here)
..

_________________
Q. Are you a stupid fascist with limited reading skills or are you just a retard?


Last edited by FJSRiDER on Wed Oct 04, 2006 12:51, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: M42
PostPosted: Tue Mar 28, 2006 13:43 
Offline
Suspended
Suspended

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 14:55
Posts: 364
Location: Ignoring the mental pygmies (and there are a lot of them here)
..

_________________
Q. Are you a stupid fascist with limited reading skills or are you just a retard?


Last edited by FJSRiDER on Wed Oct 04, 2006 12:52, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 28, 2006 15:25 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 00:01
Posts: 2258
Location: South Wales
There are 4 cameras on every gantry, one for each lane (yes, including the hard shoulder)

Not every gantry has a camera in (according to my Origin B2, and verified by wing mirrors)

And the principle is sound. Take the example of something happens to slow down traffic at a single point, say a bit of elephant racing slowing the road down to 50mph.

Eventually the elephants will go away and the people at the front of the queue they caused will start to accelerate. Meanwhile at the back of the 2 mile queue, people are still ploughing into it at 70mph and slowing down at the last minute.

Therefore if the road is operating at full capacity. The 2 mile queue will be replenished at the back as quickly as it is vanishing at the front, this will remain the case until the busy period ends and finally the supply of new cars to top up the queue will dwindle.

So if 1 mile from the back of the queue you bring in a 60 limit, a nice gap will open, and the length of the queue will be reduced before the slowed down cars begin topping it up again. More importantly the rate of topping up will be lower than the rate at which the queue is clearing and eventually you will get all the 50mph traffic out of the system.

So you've turned a 2 mile 50mph queue into a 3 mile 60mph queue, overall this is a higher rate of flow for traffic, plus less slowing down and speeding up has benefits for fuel consumption and pollution and all that guff.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 28, 2006 15:33 
Offline
Suspended
Suspended

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 14:55
Posts: 364
Location: Ignoring the mental pygmies (and there are a lot of them here)
..

_________________
Q. Are you a stupid fascist with limited reading skills or are you just a retard?


Last edited by FJSRiDER on Wed Oct 04, 2006 12:55, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 28, 2006 15:42 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 00:01
Posts: 2258
Location: South Wales
Off the top of my head, I think there's about 3 ish at the start of the VSL zone and 3ish at the end if you're going northeast. To be honest I haven't looked for them in great detail

They seem to like doing both sides on the same gantry, so that's 8 x 6 = 48 cameras, but I could easilly have missed some. I'd probably say 80 maximum.

I've not compared coming back the other way since I usually take a different result. Going west through that zone in the evening rush hour is a stupid thing to do. I go down the M1 and through Milton Keynes instead.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 28, 2006 17:25 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 19:50
Posts: 3369
Location: Lost in the Wilderness
FJSRiDER wrote:
So how many cameras are there? :?


I'll try and count them while going North on my way home on Thursday. :)

_________________
Useless laws weaken necessary laws.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2006 10:18 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 19:50
Posts: 3369
Location: Lost in the Wilderness
mpaton2004 wrote:
They're not live yet...


I emailed the Highways agency and got this reply:

Quote:
Mr xxxx,
Thank you for your email regarding the M42 junctions 3A - 7.
Mandatory/enforceable speed limits were introduced onto this section on the 29th November 2005. These limits are being enforced by the police at their discretion via our systems.
It is not currently planned that we will use the enforcement system on ATM to enforce under normal motorway conditions although the capability is there and the Police can still enforce the national speed limit via other methods, as on all other motorways. The ATM enforcement system is primarily designed to encourage drivers to comply with the variable speed limits, which will only be in use during congestion or an incident.
I hope that this addresses your queries.


Reading that I'd say they are live. :(

_________________
Useless laws weaken necessary laws.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2006 11:31 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 13:55
Posts: 2247
Location: middlish
Dixie wrote:
Quote:
Mr xxxx,
Thank you for your email regarding the M42 junctions 3A - 7.
Mandatory/enforceable speed limits were introduced onto this section on the 29th November 2005. These limits are being enforced by the police at their discretion via our systems.
It is not currently planned that we will use the enforcement system on ATM to enforce under normal motorway conditions although the capability is there and the Police can still enforce the national speed limit via other methods, as on all other motorways. The ATM enforcement system is primarily designed to encourage drivers to comply with the variable speed limits, which will only be in use during congestion or an incident.
I hope that this addresses your queries.


Reading that I'd say they are live. :(


but not at NSL.

sounds fair to me.

not convinced the VSL+2mph camera rumour is actually enforceable.. is it ?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 29, 2006 14:00 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 00:01
Posts: 2258
Location: South Wales
Well I went down there this morning, seems I underestimated the cameras somewhat.

This first 3 or 4 gantrys upon joining from the M40 all had cameras on. I forget how many because I stopped for a McDonalds at Junction 4.

There was then a gap of a few gantrys and then about 7 more. Some of these were less than 15 seconds apart (my B2 gives me 15 seconds warning, and it sometimes did this before I'd cleared the last camera!) this was at 70mph

At 8 cameras per gantry, I'd estimate there are around 100 of the things, but I did not count throughly.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 16:45 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 19:50
Posts: 3369
Location: Lost in the Wilderness
Dixie wrote:
FJSRiDER wrote:
So how many cameras are there? :?


I'll try and count them while going North on my way home on Thursday. :)


I counted 48 cameras (12 gantries) from junction 3A-7 (Northbound) and from what I could see it’s the same for the south bound, and on the same gantries. So I’d say 96 cameras in all. There where empty brackets on some gantries, maybe if they want to move them around. :)

_________________
Useless laws weaken necessary laws.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 43 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 32 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.020s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]