Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Thu May 16, 2024 05:18

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2011 21:10 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 02:17
Posts: 7355
Location: Highlands
Gazette Herald here
Gazette Herald - Jennifer Bell wrote:
Mobile camera van is new weapon against speeding on Yorkshire's roads
By Jennifer Bell » Crime reporter - 9:10am Thursday 30th June 2011

SPEEDING motorists face getting caught by North Yorkshire’s first speed camera van, which is now patrolling the county’s roads.
The van, which was unveiled at Elvington airfield yesterday, will enforce speed limits on hazardous roads and encourage motorcyclists to ride more carefully.
Backed by North Yorkshire County Council, City of York Council, the Highways Agency, and North Yorkshire Fire & Rescue Service, a four-man team will operate the van 15 hours a day, seven days a week, until Christmas.

Traffic Constable Andy Forth said the marked van, which has five cameras providing 360-degree coverage, would be deployed on more than 100 identified speeding hotspots in York and North Yorkshire.
Police will focus on locations which have a history of collisions where motorists have been killed or seriously injured, with a particular emphasis on motorcyclists.

If the pilot proves successful, North Yorkshire Police, last of the 43 forces in England and Wales to use the system, will look towards investing in a permanent speed camera van.

PC Forth said the cameras could detect the speed of approaching traffic from up to 1,000 metres away and the camera software would prevent people lying about who was behind the wheel.

He said: “You get drivers who have nine points on their licence whose partner will say they were driving to prevent somebody gaining further points. But it is pretty hard to trick the police when we have got an image on DVD of the person who is behind the wheel.
“Those people could then be charged with trying to pervert the course of justice.”

The system will record other traffic violations, including not wearing a seatbelt and using a mobile phone. Last year, 20 bikers were killed on the county’s roads and speeding accounted for 24 per cent of all road deaths in North Yorkshire in the past three years. During the same period 1,128 were injured – including 299 people seriously injured – in collisions where speed was a factor.

Tim Madgwick, North Yorkshire Police’s temporary deputy chief constable, said: “Safety cameras are a first for North Yorkshire Police, being the only area in the country not to have fixed or mobile cameras.
“We are confident that this new development will help us to drive down deaths and serious injuries further.”

The Press - Comment - Right to keep an eye on speed

A CERTAIN kind of motorist likes to grumble that speed cameras amount to little more than another tax on motorists, and a handy source of revenue for the police. Officers would be better off chasing real criminals than persecuting ordinary citizens, goes the argument.

The reality is that speeding kills. Far from it being a waste of their time, the police have a duty to ensure motorists abide by the laws of the road, and drive safely.
We have never been really convinced by fixed speed cameras – and we still aren’t. One of the problems with fixed cameras is that motorists quickly get to know where they are. So they amend their behaviour as they pass the camera – then go their merry, speeding way afterwards.

That doesn’t happen with mobile cameras, however. Would-be speedsters can never be sure where they are.
So we welcome the fact that police in North Yorkshire are now trialling a mobile camera van.
They say it will enable them to target more than 100 identified speeding hotspots – and are confident the van will help drive down deaths and serious injuries on our roads.
If it can do that, we should all be grateful.

_________________
Safe Speed for Intelligent Road Safety through proper research, experience & guidance.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2011 22:00 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member

Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 13:50
Posts: 2643
Quote:
“Those people could then be charged with trying to pervert the course of justice.”


Sounds to me like they're trying to justify the course of perversion :wink:

_________________
Only when ideology, prejudice and dogma are set aside does the truth emerge - Kepler


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 01, 2011 00:04 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 02:17
Posts: 7355
Location: Highlands
Yep, doesn't sound good for sure.
Even the reported 24% of accidents apparantely according to 'speeding' well what is that exactly? - the use of an inappropriate speed, or going too fast for conditions by failing to fully or properly appreciate the environment?
There is no 'speeding' in Law, yet people use the term a fair bit.

People will buy SatNav's and then learn the locations and many will avoid those roads, many will slow on the approach to ensure the safety of their licenses. This is of course the problem, the drivers & riders perception of safety is altered as they focus on the safety of their licenses and livelihoods, than on travelling safely.
It increases the paranoia and ruins the police / public relationship as respect is lost.

I saw pictures of this van elsewhere a few months back ... I heard they had four but this claims 5 which is interesting.
I can see that as they become targets themselves, they want to capture everything on CCTV when they are under threat or if anyone simply approaches them - great for public's trust in the police when they are shown such immediate mis-trust.

_________________
Safe Speed for Intelligent Road Safety through proper research, experience & guidance.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 07, 2011 19:43 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 14:14
Posts: 131
I wrote to the North Yorks Police on this matter stating that the finances would be better expended in other areas and after two letters of exchange was contacted by phone from the officer I/C traffic.
We had a very heated exchange on the subject,however, he stated that the equipment was only being evaulated. I asked what the cost of this equipment was and he informed me that it was "self financed". It must have cost something I retorted,his answer being that it was being leased. So, if it is self financing it will come from the fines generated from this system. (As all camarea operations are). I stated that in the press realese that it was to combat motorcycles but I enquired if all vehicles would be targeted over the posted limit(s). His reply being of course they would. He also stated that he had never travelled over any speed limit,to which I replied,- I can see that halo above your head falling a quite a bit. I have never met anyone who has never exceeded a speed limit, and they haven't been born yet.
This equipment will cost an arm and a leg to operate on lease so they are going to be rolling in the money in the near future to cover the costs. However. Everyone has a mobile and once spotted it will be relayed to others. I am somewhat dissapointed with their actions as I have always found that County be a relaxing drive. Its just the nutters that spoil it for everyone else. Ollie


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 07, 2011 20:18 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
ollie wrote:
So, if it is self financing it will come from the fines generated from this system. (As all camarea operations are).

That statement is incorrect. They were, not "are".

ollie wrote:
This equipment will cost an arm and a leg to operate on lease so they are going to be rolling in the money in the near future to cover the costs.

Again: incorrect.
The cost recovery scheme, for camera partnerships, ended in April '07. Since then, all fines generated by the SCPs have been going to the treasury and the SCPs have been funded by government grants; these grants are not set by the amount of revenue from fines (although that might have have been a factor). This is how SCPs are being downsized, because their grants have been cut, not because of the lack of fines (we wish).

Police have never recovered costs from fines.

_________________
Views expressed are personal opinions and are not necessarily shared by the Safe Speed campaign


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 07, 2011 21:31 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 16:34
Posts: 4923
Location: Somewhere between a rock and a hard place
Hi Ollie

Nice surprise to see you here after so long :o

Is your PM facility working? :?

_________________
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not necessarily represent the views of Safe Speed.
You will be branded a threat to society by going over a speed limit where it is safe to do so, and suffer the consequences of your actions in a way criminals do not, more so than someone who is a real threat to our society.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 07, 2011 22:55 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 13:54
Posts: 1711
Location: NW Kent
Quote:
The system will record other traffic violations, including not wearing a seatbelt and using a mobile phone. Last year, 20 bikers were killed on the county’s roads...


While I agree that motorcyclists are known for not wearing seat belts I cannot see how they expect to catch any using a mobile phone.

The other thing that occurs to me is how they expect to catch bikers with this?

Biker comes around bend sees scam van, biker stops, covers number plate with handy carrier bag, turns around, rides back out of sight, stops again and removes bag.

_________________
Driving fast is for a particular time and place, I can do it I just only do it occasionally because I am a gentleman.
- James May


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 15:16 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 14:14
Posts: 131
This will be self financing as "speed awarness courses" will be offered and "they keep all that finance". Also some C/Constables are raising the speed limit on these courses (could be up to 40MPH in a 30MPH) so that they absorb more into the courses and therefore generate more finances for themselves. They don't get into C/Constable rank without being devious themselves. Ollie.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 15:45 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
The qualifications to be a Chief Constable now are a bit different from the past.

- a social work qualification is required (instead of "qualification by experience" with villains)
- you need to be a member of either the Labour or Liberal parties (instead of the Freemasons)
- you need to have very Socialist views (note this is different from the point directly above)
- you need to be a politician (instead of a policeman)

Deviousness is only a desirable characteristic.

:D

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 19:18 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 14:14
Posts: 131
As I said, "Devious". North Yorks C/Constable was hauled over the coals for aiding a relation to obtain a position on the forces employment. His A/C was also involved. As the saying goes, "Who's policing the police.?) Its obvious that he will retire soon. C/Constables were being appointed at 50 some years ago now they are retiring at that age. What experience they must have I do not know but I would never trust any officer these days and thats after over 50 years of police family background and if they can alienate me how many more are there.?

malcolmw wrote:
The qualifications to be a Chief Constable now are a bit different from the past.

- a social work qualification is required (instead of "qualification by experience" with villains)
- you need to be a member of either the Labour or Liberal parties (instead of the Freemasons)
- you need to have very Socialist views (note this is different from the point directly above)
- you need to be a politician (instead of a policeman)

Deviousness is only a desirable characteristic.

:D


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 12, 2011 00:20 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 02:17
Posts: 7355
Location: Highlands
Different County Pships employ different bodies to run the courses. Some are expanding into new courses too ... there has been some consideration given to Motorbike courses, dangerous driving courses and mobile courses.
So there is ample scope for funds to filter back to those companies ...
The arrangement these organisations (IAM / AA Drivetech etc) have with the Pships is unclear, and obtaining this cost/relationship in detail is tough. See this recent response of an FOI made to Dorset Police over costs from Courses :
http://www.dpa.police.uk/pdf/PA230611_2 ... h_2011.pdf
See section 7.6 7.7 ...

_________________
Safe Speed for Intelligent Road Safety through proper research, experience & guidance.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 12, 2011 08:54 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 19:08
Posts: 3434
Quote:
....and mobile courses.


That would be a good one...how to spend a day, teaching someone how not to use a mobile phone whilst driving ..... ;-) ...."just switch it off!".....job done...;-)

_________________
My views do not represent Safespeed but those of a driver who has driven for 39 yrs, in all conditions, at all times of the day & night on every type of road and covered well over a million miles, so knows a bit about what makes for safety on the road,what is really dangerous and needs to be observed when driving and quite frankly, the speedo is way down on my list of things to observe to negotiate Britain's roads safely, but I don't expect some fool who sits behind a desk all day to appreciate that.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 16:40 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 14:14
Posts: 131
Big Tone wrote:
Hi Ollie ice surprise to see you here after so long :o

Is your PM facility working? :?

Check your mail Tony


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 10:06 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 14:14
Posts: 131
SafeSpeedv2 wrote:
Different County Pships employ different bodies to run the courses. Some are expanding into new courses too ... there has been some consideration given to Motorbike courses, dangerous driving courses and mobile courses.
So there is ample scope for funds to filter back to those companies ...
The arrangement these organisations (IAM / AA Drivetech etc) have with the Pships is unclear, and obtaining this cost/relationship in detail is tough. See this recent response of an FOI made to Dorset Police over costs from Courses :
http://www.dpa.police.uk/pdf/PA230611_2 ... h_2011.pdf
See section 7.6 7.7 ...



I have also requested details of the finances required for operation of the new N/Yorks camera and what it is hoped it will generate. If it costs X amount to operate and only bring in W amount then it will no doubt be disbanded. However, if they operate the speed awareness courses then they will possibly recover their costs. I await their response to my FOI request.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.036s | 13 Queries | GZIP : Off ]