choose your destination
choose your destination
choose your destination
choose your destination
choose your destination
no route here!
Safe Speed
Criteria Page

In this area of the Safe Speed web site we set out the basic requirements of good road traffic law. You can click the paragraph number to see "the comments page" for each claim. If you want to add to the comments page, click the mail link relating the the claim you wish to comment upon. We will post all suitable original comments, including those that we disagree with.
 

How to use this page

Column 1: Column 2: Column 3: Column 4:
Paragraph Number. Click to see comments, details, links and further reading relating to the particular claim. Claim Source, Justification, and links. (short) Click to send us email regarding the specific claim. Suitable emails from real addresses will be posted to the comments page for the particular claim. 

Criteria for better road safety law.

6.01 The law must only be applied to unsafe behaviours There is no need and no benefit to catching good safe drivers with enforcement action intended to make the roads safer. Dumb speed enforcement catches all drivers, and fails to make the required distinction.  mail
6.02 Changes should not normally result in a big increase in load for the legal process. If there was a special case, then a significant increase in load for the legal process might be justified on safety grounds. However generally we should be able to extract ourselves from the present bad legislation / bad enforcement cycle without placing an extra load on legal process. mail
6.03 The law must not dis-incentivize good driving and must not discourage good driving. Road laws which cause "dumbing down" tend to make good driving less beneficial. Dumbing down tends to create a nation of bad drivers and should be strongly avoided.  mail
6.04 The law must provide a strong dis-incentive to bad driving At present there's little legal emphasis on "bad driving" as such. Since bad driving is clearly the major cause of road accidents this is clearly a bad thing. mail
6.05 People must be able to respect the law. We are already creating a new class of lawless drivers. The more we create and enforce laws which cannot be respected by normal experienced drivers, the more we cause secondary lawless behaviour. As an example, dumb speed enforcement is causing more and more drivers to neglect registration and insurance requirements. Misuse of Police against generally law abiding and careful drivers reduces Police / public co-operation and respect.  mail
6.06 Changes in the law should be made on the basis of real safety and efficiency improvements. Far too many modern enforcement regimes are based on "bad science" and the misuse of statistics. We need real benefit if we are to be expected to conform to regulations. mail
6.07 Changes in the law should tend to increase the social value of driver training and trained drivers. (And never decrease the values) Recent road traffic law has failed to account for social values of driver skill. The message is always about obedience and never about skill or responsibility. Social values are strongly affected by law, and we need laws which value skill and individual responsibility.  mail
6.08 Changes in the law should tend to encourage further driver training.  We need to develop a culture based on driver improvement. Anything the law can do to provide incentives for driver training would be welcome and worthwhile. mail
6.09 new The law should be easy to understand. People have a right to understand what is expected of them. mail

 
We have a strict editorial policy regarding factual content. If any fact stated on this site can be shown to be wrong, it will be removed as soon as possible.
We do not condone or recommend law breaking.