Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Wed Nov 19, 2025 06:53

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 19:01 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2004 18:58
Posts: 306
Location: LanCA$Hire ex Kendal
Yesterday morning there was a head on crash on the dual carriageway alongside Preston Docks, heading towards Blackpool.

An "elderly" motorist turned right at a set of lights onto the wrong carriageway and was hit head on 100 yards up the road. The local rag reported the time at 6.48 - my wife left home at 6.30 and travelled that same road to work - she must have missed this collision by 1-2 min max :shock:

I was driving with a client this morning and turned right at the same set of lights (onto the correct carriageway, before anyone asks! :roll: ).

Low and behold, a Talivan was lurking near the accident scene. What **** use would that have been yesterday? Answers on a postcard to the Lancashire Parasites for Road Safety, Gestapo HQ.

_________________
That's how Nazi Germany started. They'll be burning books next. (Brian Noble, Wigan coach - updated 20/4/06!!).


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 19:40 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 02:50
Posts: 2868
Location: Dorset
If the combined speed of both vehicles was more than the speed limit then of course there would be an accident! :roll:

Which makes me think, if you come from an unrestricted road on to a restricted dual carriageway and enter the wrong side, would you be let off of speeding because you never saw the signs? :scratchchin:

_________________
Andrew.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 20:48 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 13:55
Posts: 2247
Location: middlish
...there was an accident there yesterday... but WITH the van... there wasn't one today...

it's a miracle i tells ya


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 00:44 
Offline
Camera Partnership Staff
Camera Partnership Staff
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 19:48
Posts: 1995
if the talivan was there yesterday, by the time the CO had seen the muppet driving the wrong way, reached for their phone / radio to call it in (exactly the same as anyone calling in) by the time the call is recieved, logged . allocated and vehicle dispatched,

100 yrds to impact no one could have got there

cause - driver error

_________________
now retired


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 00:49 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 01:51
Posts: 329
I wonder how much a pair of no-entry signs cost compared to a talivan.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 09:37 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 10:42
Posts: 155
camera operator wrote:
if the talivan was there yesterday, by the time the CO had seen the muppet driving the wrong way, reached for their phone / radio to call it in (exactly the same as anyone calling in) by the time the call is recieved, logged . allocated and vehicle dispatched,

100 yrds to impact no one could have got there

cause - driver error

Yup the talivan could make no positive difference to crash likelihood. Same as always then.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 14:42 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 15:52
Posts: 461
Einion Yrth wrote:
camera operator wrote:
if the talivan was there yesterday, by the time the CO had seen the muppet driving the wrong way, reached for their phone / radio to call it in (exactly the same as anyone calling in) by the time the call is recieved, logged . allocated and vehicle dispatched,

100 yrds to impact no one could have got there

cause - driver error

Yup the talivan could make no positive difference to crash likelihood. Same as always then.


I wonder if itll get logged as an accident caused by speed yet again?
Call me Mr Cynical, but i wouldnt trust them to sit on the toilet the right way round...

_________________
"Safety" Scamera Partnerships;
Profitting from death and misery since 1993.

Believe nothing- Question everything.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 18:17 
Offline
Camera Partnership Staff
Camera Partnership Staff
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 19:48
Posts: 1995
DeltaF wrote:
I wonder if itll get logged as an accident caused by speed yet again?
Call me Mr Cynical, but i wouldnt trust them to sit on the toilet the right way round...


dont be silly everyone knows the way you sit on the toilet is too rest your arms on the cistern

_________________
now retired


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.020s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]