botach wrote:
Contrast this with Hampshire ? police CC - who was hauled into court to explain the non disclosure (s172??)
Excellent point, and the interviewer (Paxman?) did try to get him to answer the point once or twice, but fluffed it. Once he even INTERRUPTED the PC who was saying something in response to the awkward question. A few brownie points lost there for Paxman, in my book.
By the way, I also found it irritating that despite the facts / truth / logical argument point, that PC guy was BLOODY GOOD AT PRESENTING HIMSELF AND HIS ARGUMENTS. Snarl, I can imagine a lot of the public being taken in by him.
Presentation: 95%
Bedside manner: 90%
Charm initiative: 92%
Moral fibre: 3%