Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Tue Apr 21, 2026 16:39

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Oct 13, 2006 18:51 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 19:50
Posts: 3369
Location: Lost in the Wilderness
Banbury Today

Quote:
'Terrier' on tail of lying speedsters
A BANBURY team is using the latest technology and a change in the law to catch speeding drivers trying to escape punishment.

PC Pat Knight, Thames Valley Police roads policing officer in charge of fixed penalty offences, has pioneered a new approach that is seeing offenders imprisoned, banned from driving and having their car seized and sold or crushed.

His team, based in Crouch Street, has started using the latest in face-recognition technology to expose people who falsely claim they were not driving the car at the time of the offence.

And its use of perjury laws and a change in magistrates' powers has seen cases dealt with quicker and more appropriate offences meted out.

"False declaration – it's a massive, massive problem," Mr Knight said.

"People think by lying about who's driving they'll get away with speeding and by giving false addresses we'll give up chasing them; we won't.

"I'm like a terrier; when I get my teeth into something I don't let go and I'll keep coming after offenders until they're caught and punished."

A case in point was taxi driver Majid Shirvani of Great Missenden. After being caught speeding in High Wycombe he provided driver details of an American relative.

Mr Knight brought in a specialist to compare Mr Shirvani's driving licence picture with the image on the speed camera, they matched. Shirvani continued to claim his US relative was responsible and signed an official declaration to that effect.

He was charged with perjury and appeared before Banbury magistrates in July. After changing his initial plea of not guilty to guilty he was sentenced to 46 days in prison and banned from driving for six months.

Magistrates had wanted to destroy his car but it had been sold on. This was the first time such technology was used and Mr Knight said he now had about 75 false nomination cases in the pipeline where he intends to use the technology if possible.

All Thames Valley speed camera offences are initially dealt with in Banbury.

He explained that false nomination had been an effective way of avoiding points and fines so in 2005 the Department of Transport called for dedicated police teams to crack down on it.

Most teams had been prosecuting under Perverting the Course of Justice which has to be tried at crown court so is costly and time consuming.
The time limit for prosecution for a speeding offence is six months and that can be passed in a drawn-out case, meaning punishment is limited to something relevant to the remaining charge. Mr Knight did his legal homework and found someone tried for perjury could be dealt with by magistrates within seven days.

He found that since 2004 magistrates have had the powers to give punishments relevant to the overall crime rather than just the specific charge, so even if perjury was the only charge outstanding, a motoring-related punishment could be made.

A spin-off of this approach was that exposing people willing to give false declarations regarding driving often led to the discovery of other crimes like driving while disqualified or uninsured, benefit fraud and immigration offences.

Mr Knight said his methods were now being adopted by teams across the UK.

The maximum punishment for avoiding a speeding offence by false declaration is a £5,000 fine and two years in prison.
12 October 2006


Looks like Blair masks will become a popular buy.

_________________
Useless laws weaken necessary laws.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 13, 2006 20:58 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
Quote:
"False declaration – it's a massive, massive problem," Mr Knight said.
Sad isn't it.

Must get my veil out. :)

What an amazing waste of resources to pursue technical offenders while violent criminals are let out on license to murder and rape again. However, there is little chance of anybody being sent to jail for this heinous crime at the moment.

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 13, 2006 23:25 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 00:24
Posts: 2400
Location: Kendal, Cumbria
This bit intrigues me...
Quote:
Magistrates had wanted to destroy his car but it had been sold on.

Given that the actual offence here was a non-driving one, what justification is there for destroying his car? Or is this the start of having your car crushed becoming just a handy catch-all punishment for any sort of offence? Where does this end? If the car is incidental to the crime in any case then why does it matter if he's sold it - against the basis of the report it would be no more unjust to simply crush whatever car he owns now, or his garden shed, or burn his house down perhaps...

_________________
CSCP Latin for beginners...
Ticketo ergo sum : I scam therefore I am!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 13, 2006 23:41 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 00:15
Posts: 5232
Location: Windermere
malcolmw wrote:
Quote:
"False declaration – it's a massive, massive problem," Mr Knight said.
Sad isn't it.

Must get my veil out. :)


Quote:
.....benefit fraud and immigration offences.

Careful, you might find yourself deported!! :shock:
On the otherhand, you could apply for assylum, and end up getting thousands of pounds in benefits - legally! :D

_________________
Time to take responsibility for our actions.. and don't be afraid of speaking out!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 14, 2006 00:54 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 23:42
Posts: 200
Location: Milton Keynes
JT wrote:
Given that the actual offence here was a non-driving one, what justification is there for destroying his car? Or is this the start of having your car crushed becoming just a handy catch-all punishment for any sort of offence?


since 2004 magistrates have had the powers to give punishments relevant to the overall crime rather than just the specific charge

It's a worrying but entirely predictable consequence of that change that allows you have your car confiscated, or have your driving license taken away, just as a way of punishing you and not because the car is dangerous or you're deemed unfit to drive.

_________________
Peter Humphries (and a green V8S)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: !
PostPosted: Sat Oct 14, 2006 01:22 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
And you can have your driving licence taken away for not paying your child support !

I always drive with the sun visors down.....and the seat high.....


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 158 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.024s | 10 Queries | GZIP : Off ]