johnsher wrote:
PeterE wrote:
therefore we have to recognise that the reasons for people not doing it are related to social attitudes and conditioning, not a rational assessment of risk.
I'd say the reason for a lot of people not DD is the fear of getting caught and the resultant criminal record.
For some people, yes. But surely with this, as with most other things to do with traffic law, it is
mostly self-enforcing.
You can ride a pushbike after six or seven pints and stand zero chance of being prosecuted, but I suspect the vast majority of cyclists never do.
Even before the breathalyser, most people would have been well aware that driving after consuming substantial quantities of alcohol was a bad idea and not have done it.
There is, of course, a caveat, that after a few drinks your perception of your own abilities is exaggerated.
However, the view that, before 1967 50%, or 33%, or 25% of male drivers were regularly driving after a skinful is nonsense.
We also as a society drink twice as much per person as we did then.