Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Fri Nov 21, 2025 02:24

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 17:00 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 08:22
Posts: 2618
http://motoring.aol.co.uk/review-into-r ... 0409990001

Review into road death prosecutions

Road deaths are notoriously difficult to prosecute

A major review of the way dangerous drivers who kill on the roads are prosecuted is to be unveiled.

Director of Public Prosecutions Ken Macdonald QC is launching a study of the way the Crown Prosecution Service handles "bad driving" cases.

The consultation will examine how the CPS makes decisions on taking offenders to court, as well as whether levels of support offered to victims and witnesses can be improved.

Hundreds of killers on the roads walk free each year because of difficulties faced by prosecutors in bringing death by dangerous driving charges.

The offence carries up to 14 years' imprisonment but prosecutors frequently opt for the lesser charge of careless driving or driving without due care and attention.

These are easier to prove but only carry a maximum fine of £2,500.

The new Road Safety Act, which won Royal Assent last month, will introduce a new offence of causing death by careless driving, carrying up to five years' imprisonment.

The DPP announced plans for the review earlier this year because of public concerns that too many drivers were escaping with a non-custodial sentence.

Road safety campaign group Roadpeace said 90 per cent of road traffic cases involving a death are dealt with in the magistrates' courts where the average fine is £250.

_________________
Science won over religion when they started installing lightning rods on churches.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 17:04 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:30
Posts: 2053
Location: South Wales (Roving all UK)
But maybe that's because the death was as a result of an accident?? or the dead person was at fault?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 17:10 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
Yep, if someone is blind drunk and staggers into the road in front of a car, who's fault is it?

How many parents have been prosecuted for criminal negligence for not supervising their children playing near a main road.

Quote:
Almost half of all pedestrians killed in road crashes late at night are more than twice over the drink drive limit, official figures reveal.


http://news.monstersandcritics.com/uk/printer_1064314.php

In the US public intoxication is illegal.

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 23:49 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 21:27
Posts: 247
Location: Near Stockport
Gizmo wrote:
Yep, if someone is blind drunk and staggers into the road in front of a car, who's fault is it?
This happened last year in Bramhall, Cheshire. A police van attending a disturbance by yobs killed a drunk who "lurched into the road". The causes were the yobs and the drunk, not the police car.

Gizmo wrote:
How many parents have been prosecuted for criminal negligence for not supervising their children playing near a main road.
The result in Manchester when a toddler was killed by a car after his dad had left the gate open when crossing the road to chat with a neighbour was the installation of speed bumps. No blame was apparently attached to the father; "speeding drivers" were blamed. :evil:

_________________
Brian


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 00:05 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
There's an actual consultation. I thought it was important enough to start a new thread: http://www.safespeed.org.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?t=11393

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: !
PostPosted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 01:54 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
"Research shows 80% of pedestrian deaths on Friday and Saturday nights are alcohol-related, as are nearly three quarters of peak time accident and emergency admissions"

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6089784.stm

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmhansrd/cm051128/text/51128w41.htm


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 21:00 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
This article in today's Times also suggests that the government are seeking to move the boundary between careless and dangerous driving:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0, ... 83,00.html

Quote:
Prosecutors frequently opt to charge dangerous drivers with lesser charges, such as careless driving or driving without due care and attention, because of the difficulties of securing a conviction for death by dangerous driving. These are easier to prove but carry a maximum fine of only £2,500.

Publishing the consultation paper, Mr Macdonald, QC, said that there was often “a lack of public confidence in our approach to cases of bad driving, particularly those involving a death”.

The paper, which covers England and Wales, says that many bad habits currently prosecuted as careless driving, including tailgating, running a red light and holding a mobile phone while driving, could be treated as dangerous driving, which carries a maximum penalty of two years’ imprisonment.

Mr Macdonald said: “We want to make sure our policies reflect public views. The test is if you were standing on the pavement and saw something would you think, ‘That’s bloody dangerous’? “Do people regard as dangerous types of driving that they would not have regarded as dangerous five or ten years ago? My feeling is that public attitudes have moved on.”

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 21:28 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 13:36
Posts: 1339
Quote:
Mr Macdonald said: “We want to make sure our policies reflect public views. The test is if you were standing on the pavement and saw something would you think, ‘That’s bloody dangerous’? “Do people regard as dangerous types of driving that they would not have regarded as dangerous five or ten years ago? My feeling is that public attitudes have moved on.”



Oh great: justice by mob mentality. What next, phone in votes? "If you think Mr Smith's putting two wheels up on the pavement to let an ambulance past was potentially dangerous, text YES."


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 23:35 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Quote:
The test is if you were standing on the pavement and saw something would you think, ‘That’s bloody dangerous’? “Do people regard as dangerous types of driving that they would not have regarded as dangerous five or ten years ago? My feeling is that public attitudes have moved on


Just a little way from the fuddy duddies on the corner shouting that cars are speeding - and then we find out that most of them have never held a licence, never opened the HC or any driving manual - and some of them couldn't read the numberplate at the prescribed distance anyway.
So much for frowning on vigilantes.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.015s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]