Trial in Progress
Denies phone use
Found Guilty
Four and a half years
Family appeal over mobile phones
I have been trying to understand how this crash happened. As far as I can tell, the phone call that's getting the blame was finished two minutes before the crash took place - and I can't see any good reason here for blaming the phone call.
The desriptions of the crash include:
Quote:
"Robert Murray, 51, of Wrockwardine Wood, Telford, is charged with causing death by dangerous driving.
He told a jury how he felt a bump, then saw in his mirror the underside of a Renault Clio as it landed upright.
Rebecca Casterton, 13, and Lauren Brooks, 12, died on the A38 in Clay Mills in Staffordshire last January.
The 51-year-old father told Stafford Crown Court that he had earlier made a call to his wife on his hands-free telephone, but was watching where he was going.
He said before moving into the offside lane, he checked his rear view mirror, indicated, looked again and, still straddling the white lines, felt a judder.
Mr Murray said: "I was devastated. I thought it was a safe manoeuvre.
"I was not on a mobile phone at any stage when I was overtaking."
The prosecution said the Clio was spun out of control into the central reservation and landed upside down in the opposite carriageway where it was hit by a Mercedes car.
In a statement to the jury, Mrs Irene Corrie, Lauren's mother, who was driving the Clio, said she was aware of Murray's lorry coming alongside her.
"Then it seemed to go backwards and I then felt a bang at the back of my car. I knew the lorry had hit us."
***
"Judge Paul Glenn said he accepted Murray had not being making a call at the time of the accident.
But he added that he was satisfied his attention was diverted with regard to the phone."
The
BBC video says that the hand-free phone call had finished two minutes before the crash and that the lorry hit the rear of the car during a lane change.
Now on available evidence this seems to have gone horribly wrong.
* I don't see how it could ever by possible to deduce that the phone had anything at all to do with the crash.
* It sounds more like a common or garden 'blind spot' crash to me.
* I can't quite figure out how the lorry hit the rear of the car - possible the rear wheels hit the nearside rear of the car. I can't see anything here which puts the car in front of the lorry to be clipped by the front bumper.
* I can't figure out the claims from the car diver that the lorry 'came alongside' or 'seemed to move backwards'. Eh?
* I can't see 'dangerous driving' here at all. Careless driving certainly.
More than anything else it sounds like a tragic accident, and I can't help but wonder what the car driver was doing while the lorry was coming over.
Can anyone make better sense of it?