Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Thu Jun 11, 2026 03:25

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 63 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 23:22 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 16:37
Posts: 265
adam.L wrote:
I have often thought that smoking in the presence of young kids was borderline child abuse.


And the opposite is...? When young kids are smoking around adults? Don't forget, it's not illegal for someone under 16 yrs to smoke - only to purchase.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 23:26 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 00:11
Posts: 764
Location: Sofa
camera operator wrote:
whats the website ???

its not a law in the criminal aspect its a ban in a civil aspect
So, your argument is that the ban is nothing to do with safety and is, in actual fact, law making for it's own sake based on flawed statistics and misguided good intentions? As such, right-minded people like you feel that it's not a law that needs to be obeyed?

:scratchchin: Where have I heard something like that before? :twisted:

_________________
Less Kodak, more Kojak.
In times of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 00:19 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 00:54
Posts: 327
Location: Rural Somerset
Sieg Heil! Sieg Heil! Sieg Heil!

(Just thought I'd get a bit of practice in).


Where's the best place to emigrate to?

_________________
Save a cow - eat a vegetarian


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 03:05 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 18:42
Posts: 1283
Location: Essex
Quote:
EHOs et al can already hand out FPNs for littering, fly tipping and the like.


EHO's and HSE Inspectors have Warrant Cards and have clearly defined powers unders HSWA, for the purposes of inspection and enforcement they are deemed to be officers of the court.

_________________
Gordon Brown saying I got the country into it's current economic mess so I'll get us out of it is the same as Bomber Harris nipping over to Dresden and offering to repair a few windows.

Chaos, panic and disorder - my work here is done.

http://www.wildcrafts.co.uk


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 03:39 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 14:06
Posts: 3654
Location: Oxfordshire
camera operator wrote:
everyone has cancer cells it takes something to trigger them off


Yes.....they're called your cells!!

Google is your friend!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 09:52 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 00:45
Posts: 1016
Location: Mighty Tamworth
adam.L wrote:
ree.t wrote:
I suspect a petty minded (little man/woman) who love the tiny little bit of power they have.


Well I'd do it for free and in my own time. Oh to dish out some revenge on smokers.


Humm?

If people want to smoke it is their issue. Fair enough stop it in public places. But training people to spy on US to catch one or two smokers in a public place takes the piss. It is not just the smokers who are effected we (the none smokers ) are. What we have is people spying on our activities in a public place. I imagine you think the other on the spot fines are okay. This does include speeding fines. Or is it that you think smoking is wrong, and you don’t do it. so it is okay fine to spy on and persecute them as it does not effect you?! It amazes me that some of you are against speed cameras because it is a law you do not agree with, but when they do something similar to smokers, it’s fine because you agree with it.

_________________
Oct 11 Birmingham Half Marathon. I am running for the British Heart Foundation.
http://www.justgiving.com/Rob-Taylor


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 10:14 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 09:01
Posts: 1548
RobinXe wrote:
I hope they've only hired big burly guys as the inspectors. How do you think its gonna play out when some jumped-up little sh*t goes up to a group of drunk lads in the local pub who've just sparked up and tells them to put it out, waving his fine pad and camera at them; the evidence in court will likely look more like a colonoscopy! :lol:

I can't wait for these so called inspectors to turn up at somewhere like the Kent Custom Bike Show or the Bulldog Bash and start trying to hand out fines for smoking in the beer tent :lol: :lol:

_________________
What makes you think I'm drunk officer, have I got a fat bird with me?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 10:39 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 08:22
Posts: 2618
Imagine the scene...

Small, skinny, middle-aged bespecticled man walks over to a group of back-patch, coughs and asks politely if they would mind awfully putting out their cigarettes....

_________________
Science won over religion when they started installing lightning rods on churches.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 10:47 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
The 'passive smoking' science is about as weak as anything I've ever seen. Weaker, if anything, than the 'speed kills' science - unless anyone knows different?

I think the final best estimate was that being a non-smoker, living with a family of smokers, was equivalent to smoking 6 cigarettes per year.

It's just another bandwagon for the 'ban it' crowd.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 17:22 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Bit on the radio today -

Scotland - 4 cases of smoking in public places - no official policing.---SITUATION SELF PLOICING.
England - massive £m spent on training council officials


WHY???


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 17:31 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 16:04
Posts: 816
And I just read that the EU has had to repeal it's no-smoking ban in the head offices 47 days after it was implemented because it is being routinely flouted. :rotfl:

_________________
Prepare to be Judged


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 19:23 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 00:11
Posts: 764
Location: Sofa
There was a load of talk before the ban came in here in Scotland along the lines of "I'll smoke wherever I want" "who's going to stop me" etc

Turned out to be a load of hot air. In the end everyone has just accepted it and moved on. Not a big deal at all. Even smokers agree that it's a lot more pleasant being in a pub that doesn't stink of smoke. As mentioned earlier in this thread, many pubs have adapted outdoor spaces to cater for those who still want to have a fag.

_________________
Less Kodak, more Kojak.
In times of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 22:12 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2004 14:47
Posts: 1659
Location: A Dark Desert Highway
patdavies wrote:
adam.L wrote:
I have often thought that smoking in the presence of young kids was borderline child abuse.


And the opposite is...? When young kids are smoking around adults? Don't forget, it's not illegal for someone under 16 yrs to smoke - only to purchase.


I'm not big on kids, don't want any myself. I don't think kids should be wrapped in cotton wool, they should be allowed to fall of bikes, fall out of trees, fall of the Heelys (arn't they the best shoes ever?), they should be allowed to scrape their knees and do all the things that teaches you/us about life. But for Christ sake, let them breath clean air. I see kids in push chair being pushed around buy a parent smoking and I just think that poor child hasn't got a chance. He or she hasn't got a say in his lfe when they are that small and their parents are prediposing them to breathing problems.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 22:13 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 21:15
Posts: 699
Location: Belfast
:gatso2: So it'll be illegal to smoke in public places? They're now going to gather photographic evidence of offenders. What happens if the offenders are sent to prison? You'll be delighted to know it's not illegal to smoke in a prison cell.

:lol: Oh dear. back to the drawing board!

:book: If you've ever read George Orwell's 1984, you'll know that smoking and drinking were NOT banned by Big Brother.

_________________
Anyone who tells you that nothing is impossible has never bathed in a saucer of water.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 22:19 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2004 14:47
Posts: 1659
Location: A Dark Desert Highway
SafeSpeed wrote:
The 'passive smoking' science is about as weak as anything I've ever seen. Weaker, if anything, than the 'speed kills' science - unless anyone knows different?

I think the final best estimate was that being a non-smoker, living with a family of smokers, was equivalent to smoking 6 cigarettes per year.

It's just another bandwagon for the 'ban it' crowd.


Put Paul, I don't smoke and don't want to smoke any cigarettes a year. I public spaces it should be assumed that the air is clean. If we have to work in an area where the air has any other contaminant in it the contaminant is either removed or we are given breathing apparatus.

If I am following a car were an occupant is smoking I can smell it. Even if the dangers of passive smoking is over stated, it still makes my clothes stink.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 23:49 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
As said .. am non-smoker and advise all patients who smoke to quit... and provide the help for them to do so.

But by and large.. object to spies and yet more cameras to spy on us on a night out. For all I know there is a camera hidden in the gents.. filming folk having a pee and taking a dump in there. Ye gods.. if you light up near these lentil munchers :yikes: :yikes: ... one would need more than a :bunker: and a :tank: for cover .. :lol:

I think most are now used to not smoking in the work place and will generally respect and not smoke in public. But the solution in this country seems to be film and fine.. without using common sense judgements and human inter-action. :roll:

_________________
If you want to get to heaven - you have to raise a little hell!

Smilies are contagious
They are just like the flu
We use our smilies on YOU today
Now Good Causes are smiling too!

KEEP SMILING
It makes folk wonder just what you REALLY got up to last night!

Smily to penny.. penny to pound
safespeed prospers-smiles all round! !

But the real message? SMILE.. GO ON ! DO IT! and the world will smile with you!
Enjoy life! You only have the one bite at it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 00:25 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
adam.L wrote:
SafeSpeed wrote:
The 'passive smoking' science is about as weak as anything I've ever seen. Weaker, if anything, than the 'speed kills' science - unless anyone knows different?

I think the final best estimate was that being a non-smoker, living with a family of smokers, was equivalent to smoking 6 cigarettes per year.

It's just another bandwagon for the 'ban it' crowd.


Put Paul, I don't smoke and don't want to smoke any cigarettes a year. I public spaces it should be assumed that the air is clean. If we have to work in an area where the air has any other contaminant in it the contaminant is either removed or we are given breathing apparatus.

If I am following a car were an occupant is smoking I can smell it. Even if the dangers of passive smoking is over stated, it still makes my clothes stink.


I don't understand why anyone wants to impose their ideals on others - surely we can live together and make room for the habits and desires of others?

I also believe that 'the market' is a good way to get these things sorted out. If people want non-smoking pubs, then the demand will make them. Why do we need anything other than that?

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 02:12 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 01:16
Posts: 917
Location: Northern England
Could it be!.......Nah surely not, but hey, maybe!......

Could it be that the "expense" of these "invisible" inspectors is a cover for "Expenditure" elsewhere?........like the USA $3000 toilet seat?.... :roll:



Creative accounting at it's best... hey?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 10:27 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 00:45
Posts: 1016
Location: Mighty Tamworth
adam.L wrote:

Put Paul, I don't smoke and don't want to smoke any cigarettes a year. I public spaces it should be assumed that the air is clean.

:lol: Depends on what you mean by clean really? Or do you mean just free of smoke from cigarettes?
:roll:
adam.L wrote:
If I am following a car were an occupant is smoking I can smell it. Even if the dangers of passive smoking is over stated, it still makes my clothes stink.


You must be driving close or in a traffic jam. I would be more worried about the fumes coming out the exhaust? CyHz NOx CO and CO2 and all the other particulates. Unburnt hydrocarbons are linked to cancer. Exhaust fumes also are linked to lung/breathing problems. I would consider it dangers for you to fill your car up. Petrol contains Benzene which is a suspected cancer causing chemicals.

_________________
Oct 11 Birmingham Half Marathon. I am running for the British Heart Foundation.
http://www.justgiving.com/Rob-Taylor


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 11:30 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 09:01
Posts: 1548
Sixy_the_red wrote:
Imagine the scene...

Small, skinny, middle-aged bespecticled man walks over to a group of back-patch, coughs and asks politely if they would mind awfully putting out their cigarettes....

Now I would pay good money to watch that :lol: :lol: :lol:

Of course we know that will never happen though, because they won't have the nads for it. In fact, the tossers are probably sitting there right now watching re-runs of "Britains Hardest Pubs" and compiling a list of pubs not to visit come the 1st July.

_________________
What makes you think I'm drunk officer, have I got a fat bird with me?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 63 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.029s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]