Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Thu Apr 30, 2026 23:13

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 44 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 17:22 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 19:50
Posts: 3369
Location: Lost in the Wilderness
Smeggy, if that's the new style of two wheel overtaking, maybe it should be added as part of the road test :lol:

_________________
Useless laws weaken necessary laws.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 17:43 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Despite the utter stupidity of the scheme, there's quite a bit of room between gravel and bollard. Look at this:

Image

If the car is 5.5ft wide, there's also 5.5ft of tarmac to its left and slightly more than 5.5ft to its right, suggesting that around 16.5 feet of tarmac is available. This looks like enough room to get a truck past a car. Just. Getting a Police car or an ambulance past cars shouldn't be a problem.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 18:11 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
SafeSpeed wrote:
If the car is 5.5ft wide, there's also 5.5ft of tarmac to its left and slightly more than 5.5ft to its right, suggesting that around 16.5 feet of tarmac is available. This looks like enough room to get a truck past a car. Just. Getting a Police car or an ambulance past cars shouldn't be a problem.

You’ve assumed the vehicles will park parallel to the road, which never happens when emergency vehicles are trying to cut their way through a traffic jam. Cars/vans usually end up at angles because there’s not enough room ahead to straighten up, therefore leaving less space for the passing emergency vehicle. God only knows what a truck driver would have to do.

One this is for sure, quick response emergency vehicles will not be passing such stationary traffic on that road very quickly, if at all!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 09, 2006 18:46 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 23:42
Posts: 200
Location: Milton Keynes
smeggy wrote:
One this is for sure, quick response emergency vehicles will not be passing such stationary traffic on that road very quickly, if at all!


Perhaps the bollards all retract when an emergency vehicle needs to go through? :twisted:

_________________
Peter Humphries (and a green V8S)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 10, 2006 09:54 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 14:04
Posts: 2325
Location: The interweb
SafeSpeed wrote:
If the car is 5.5ft wide, there's also 5.5ft of tarmac to its left and slightly more than 5.5ft to its right, suggesting that around 16.5 feet of tarmac is available. This looks like enough room to get a truck past a car. Just. Getting a Police car or an ambulance past cars shouldn't be a problem.


That is assuming the truck has space to move over. If there is an accident up ahead and traffic backs up it's likely they will come to rest in the centre of the lane with no room to manouver.

I assume the posts are the easily collapsing type which an ambulance would have no problem driving through. They were used at a pinch point near where I live, I say used because the council got sick of replacing them.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 10, 2006 22:59 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 20:00
Posts: 115
Location: Berkshire
I agree it looks daft but has anyone thought of writing to the Highway Authority to ask what their thinking behind this scheme was? Who they consulted and what views that consultation elicited?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 00:32 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 22:31
Posts: 407
Location: A Safe Distance From Others
Would I be able to get a small refund on my council tax for the money I have contributed to the now unused tarmac?!?!

I mean, I've paid for the road surface so surely I should be allowed to use it??!!

_________________
Simon


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 01:51 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 02:50
Posts: 2868
Location: Dorset
They look plasticy, they probably won't last too long...

Is that a 'motorbike lane'?
Red surface to cover the blood when hitting the one coming the other way... :o

SigmaMotion wrote:
I mean, I've paid for the road surface so surely I should be allowed to use it??!!

Best not tell you about bus/cycle lanes...

_________________
Andrew.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:52 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:30
Posts: 2053
Location: South Wales (Roving all UK)
I used to drive that road almost daily for the best part of 12 months. Theres no way I'd contemplate that commute now. Well done DCC you've just hit another hammer blow to the economy of north devon!

Very fast and potentially dangerous but matches can kill if not used properly!!! The road is very hilly and NSL single c'way. County tractors hopping on and off, HGV's limited to 40mph with no prospect of overtaking them. Can you imagine the frustration??

It's pure hatred of the motorist.

I'm going to a do in barnsptaple next week so I'll report back.

What a disgraceful action. Whoever sanctioned this is a a disgrace to my profession.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 10:40 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 08:22
Posts: 2618
civil engineer wrote:
The road is very hilly and NSL single c'way. County tractors hopping on and off, HGV's limited to 40mph with no prospect of overtaking them. Can you imagine the frustration??.


If its 'hilly' then I assume since its North Devon that actually means that there's 1:5 gradients everywhere...?

Thus most HGVs won't be making 40 anyway... I've passed fully loaded 44tonners trying to make it up Birdlip Hill on the A417 struggling to make 10mph.

_________________
Science won over religion when they started installing lightning rods on churches.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 14:21 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:30
Posts: 2053
Location: South Wales (Roving all UK)
It's lowest common denominator traffic engineering again.

Complete rubbish!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 21:34 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2004 12:27
Posts: 56
Sorry, but thats just plain daft!

_________________
The police ARE the law, not ABOVE it!!!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 10:59 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:30
Posts: 2053
Location: South Wales (Roving all UK)
what's plain daft?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 22:55 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2004 12:27
Posts: 56
Effectively reducing the road by 1 lane. Look at the A303 between the A358 and Yeabridge. Its got alternating 2 lane stretches where you get 2 lanes one way and one the other for about 1-2 miles then the pattern switches so the other carriageway gets the 2 lane stretch for a while. If memory serves this switch happens about 6 times on a 10 mile section of the road. Why not apply this idea to the road shown here? Put the bollards in, make sure it is double white lined for its distance and put plenty of warning signs up to indicate where the 2 carriageways merge back into 1. Seems to work well enough (although there is 1 speed camera on this piece of road) and traffic tends to flow fairly smoothly most fo teh time

_________________
The police ARE the law, not ABOVE it!!!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 00:46 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
The posts on this section of the A39 seem to be steadily being knocked down:

Image

Let's see how long it takes before they're all gone :twisted:

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 01:06 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 00:01
Posts: 2258
Location: South Wales
I am currently considering the purchase of a 1985 Volvo 740

Where is this road again? ;)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 01:08 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 00:11
Posts: 764
Location: Sofa
I've got a 1995 850. Will that do? :evil:

_________________
Less Kodak, more Kojak.
In times of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 01:11 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 00:01
Posts: 2258
Location: South Wales
MrsMiggins wrote:
I've got a 1995 850. Will that do? :evil:


Only if you're prepared to sell it to me for less than £500


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 14:14 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 01:55
Posts: 235
Location: Bristol
I have friends in Torrington, not far from Barnstaple. Coming back one night along that very section of road I got stuck behind a broken down HGV.

For about 2 hours.

And nothing could move, nothing could overtake it.

Utter utter stupidity.

I then had another 2 hours drive to get home (I live just north of Bristol).


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 22:01 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 00:11
Posts: 764
Location: Sofa
Lum wrote:
MrsMiggins wrote:
I've got a 1995 850. Will that do? :evil:


Only if you're prepared to sell it to me for less than £500
S'funny you should say that. Guess how much I paid for it? :D

_________________
Less Kodak, more Kojak.
In times of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 44 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 91 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.017s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]