Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Mon Nov 17, 2025 19:22

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Daily Express 28/2/07
PostPosted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 12:52 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 21:15
Posts: 699
Location: Belfast
:gatso2: Have a look at this item in the Daily Express. Unfortunately there's no smiley for angrily spitting feathers.

Road pricing 'will be used to hit speeders' (edited)

A satellite tracking system with the potential to curb the speed of every vehicle in Britain will is being developed by the Government.

The "Big Brother" spy technology will mean black box transmitters in vehicles to monitor driving and instantly record any breach of the speed limit. In effect the move is expected to lead to the virtual end of speeding.

But critics fear the system will replace the hated speed camera with something more sinister and intrusive. Last night one motoring organisation claimed it would turn drivers into "zombies."

The extent of progress in setting up the system was revealed in a report prepared for Transport Secretary Douglas Alexander. It showed that £2 million of taxpayers' cash had already been spent on developing "Intelligent Speed Adaptation" technology. A trial already under way in Britain is expected to end within months.

Officials insist there are "no plans" to make the system compulsory, claiming many motorists will volunteer to take part. But the report says the Department of Transport "will take a leading role in developing a national speed limit database".

The move is bound to face widespread opposition. Anger is already sweeping the country at Government plans to introduce a "spy-in-the-sky" road toll system.

Shadow Transport Secretary Chris Grayling said: "The Big Brother tendencies of the Government are becoming clearer by the day. Putting an electronic spy into every car isn't the answer when we have two million rogue drivers who operate outside the rules."

Using a national database, the speed limit for any road would be automatically communicated to the black box. Any breach could set off an alarm in the vehicle and even trigger an instant penalty notice.

Brian Gregory, of the ABD said: " I will not drive a car fitted with ISA because I think it is dangerous. You cannot accelerate away from problems in a car with a restricted top speed. We are turning drivers into zombies on cruise control."

The Department of Transport last night confirmed the system was being developed but said: "We have no plans to make it compulsory. It has to be led by consumer demand." the report suggested firms with vehicle fleets would voluntarily sign up for the system to promote good driving. The report does not say when the system could come in, but national satellite road charging is scheduled to be introduced by 2015.

_________________
Anyone who tells you that nothing is impossible has never bathed in a saucer of water.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 13:45 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 16:04
Posts: 816
I would never, ever drive a car that has ISA attached and I wouldn't ride a bike with ISA on it. In both instances it has the potential to kill due to being unable to accelerate out of danger.

Can anyone give me ideas of countries to emigrate where there isn't a 4 year waiting list?

_________________
Prepare to be Judged


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 17:25 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 00:42
Posts: 832
Full transcript

Quote:
Road pricing ‘will be used to hit speeders’

Daily Express Wednesday 28 February 2007 Page 11

By Macer Hall and John Ingham


A SATELLITE tracking system with the potential to curb the speed of every vehicle in Britain is being developed by the Government.

The "Big Brother" spy technology will mean black-box transmitters in vehicles to monitor driving and instantly record any breach of the speed limit.

In effect, the move is expected to lead to the virtual end of speeding.

But critics fear the system will replace the hated speed camera with something even more sinister and intrusive. Last night one motoring organisation claimed it would turn drivers into "zombies".

The extent of progress in setting up the system was revealed in a report prepared for Transport Secretary Douglas Alexander.

Anger

It showed that £2million of taxpayers' cash had already been spent on developing "Intelligent Speed Adaptation" technology. A trial already under way in Britain is expected to end within months.

Officials insist there are "no plans" to make the system compulsory, claiming many motorists will volunteer to take part.

But the report says the Department of Transport "will take a leading role in developing a national speed limit database".

The move is bound to face widespread opposition. Anger is already sweeping the country at Government plans to introduce a "spy-in¬-the-sky" road toll system.

More than 1.8million people backed an internet petition on the Downing Street website opposing road charging.

Shadow Transport Secretary Chris Grayling said: "The Big Brother tendencies of the Government are becoming clearer by the day. Putting an electronic spy into every car isn't the answer when we have two million rogue drivers who operate outside the rules."

The report shows that the system would be similar to the GPS satellite navigation technology.

Using a national database, the speed limit for any road would be automatically communicated to the black box. Any breach could set off an alarm in the vehicle and even trigger an instant penalty notice.

A similar system to enforce speed limits is already operating in Dubai.

The RAC Foundation compared the "Big Brother" system with the speed limits set on dodgems.

Executive director Edmund King said: "Dodgem cars have speed limiters but all crash. If a motorist gives up control to Big Brother or a satellite, he is not concentrating."

Brian Gregory, of the Association of British Drivers said: "I will not drive in a car fitted with ISA because I think it is dangerous.

"You cannot accelerate away from problems in a car with a restricted top speed. We are turning drivers into zombies on cruise control." The Department of Transport last night confirmed the system was being developed but said: "We have no plans to make it compulsory. It has to be led by consumer demand."

The report suggested firms with vehicle fleets would voluntarily sign up for the system to promote good driving. The report does not say when the system could come in, but national satellite road charging is scheduled to be introduced by 2015.


So do we still believe and trust this government ???


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 17:27 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Anyone seen the Daily Mail's version of this story? I had a long chat with them about it.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 17:31 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 00:42
Posts: 832
SafeSpeed wrote:
Anyone seen the Daily Mail's version of this story? I had a long chat with them about it.

I had a scan through the Daily Mail, at least to past the centre fold, when I went to get the Daily Express, and did not notice it, but I may have missed it.


Inset on the same page of the Daily Express;
Quote:
Drivers' mobiles could be seized

MOBILE phones may be seized from drivers caught using them on the road.

Home Secretary John Reid said yesterday that he was "open" to the idea, as stricter punishments for using a handset at the wheel came into force.

The fixed fine for offenders has doubled, from £30 to £60, and for the first time, those caught using hand-held mobiles will get three penalty points on their licences.

Mr Reid said on the Downing Street website: "I'm always open to suggestion that the phone should be confiscated, though given their widespread availability and relatively cheap cost this may not be a deterrent."


Last edited by Dr L on Wed Feb 28, 2007 17:49, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 17:46 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 16:04
Posts: 816
Daily Mail

Quote:
An electronic spy could soon be built into every car to catch out speeding motorists, the Tories have claimed.

The black box device uses satellite technology to track drivers every move and issue them with speeding tickets if they are caught breaking the law.

The system, known as Intelligent Speed Adaptation, could replace all speed cameras in the UK, leading to enforced speed limits on all roads at all times.

The Department of Transport has already funded a two-year study and experts believe that car manufacturers will fit the "black boxes" - costing between £100 and £200 - into all new cars within the decade.

It can also automatically apply the brakes or block the accelerator to prevent a driver from exceeding the speed limit.

Opposition MPs said the plans were further evidence that Britain was turning into a "Big Brother" style surveillance state.

It comes only days after Prime Minister Tony Blair ignored protests of nearly 1.8 million Britons against national road pricing - which will also use "Spy in the Sky" technology to charge motorists for every mile they travel.

Ministers believe the number of people injured on the roads each year would fall by 20 per cent while fatalities would be cut by 37 per cent.

Shadow Transport Secretary Chris Grayling said: "This is an extraordinary new development. From ID cards, to chips in wheelie bins to monitor your rubbish, to clipboard-weilding council tax inspectors having the right to come into your home, the Big Brother tendencies of the Government are becoming clearer by the day.

"Now we find out that they've already spent £2million preparing for another satellite spy-in-the-sky system to monitor every drive on every road - this time to enforce speed limits."

Mr Grayling added that ministers should be cracking down on rogue drivers rather than criminalising ordinary motorists who go a couple of miles over the speed limit.

He said: "Of course the Government does need to get serious about road safety. But this means cracking down on the rogue drives on the roads, who we already know are more likely to be involved in accidents.

"Across the country, to the detriment of road safety, and we already have police forces relying on cameras rather than uniformed drivers, and putting an electronic spy into every car isn't the answer when we have two million drivers who operate outside the rules altogether."

However, a Department for Transport spokesman last night denied ministers were considering the plans.

He said: "It is not true. We have done feasibility studies into this, but we have been clear that there are no plans to make it compulsory."

The Intelligent Speed Adaptation (ISA) system is already used in some vehicles. When a car drives into an area where the speed limit drops from 40 mph to 30mph, a signal is sent to a device which controls the car's engine management system, preventing the speed from rising above the legal limit.

The driver hears an audible "beep" when the limit changes, and can see a warning on the electronic map on the dashboard.

The system detects whether the driver is responding to the new limit and, if not, will begin braking automatically some 300 yards before the 30mph sign.

The Government's road safety review says the use of Intelligent Speed Adaptation "will only be possible with the development of a national speed limit database".

But it then goes on to say that the Department of Transport will take a "leading role" in developing such a system.

It will also liaise with councils to run a pilot "speed limit updating process" and also investigate a trunk road pilot scheme with the Government's Highways Agency.

Critics point out that the Government is carefully putting in place - like pieces from a jigsaw - all the disparate elements necessary to create a 'Big Brother' surveillance system that can track, charge and prosecute drivers with automatic fixed penalty notices.

The Silvester Stallone and Sandra Bullock sci-fi movie "Demolition Man" - in which a Los Angeles cop is transported to the future - features just such a system, with drivers automatically billed for traffic, speeding and even language violations if they swear.

Earlier this month the Daily Mail revealed how a blueprint for pay-as-you drive road-pricing schemes, sent out recently to local councils, makes clear that cars should also be penalised according to how much they pollute - not just the distance travelled.

This would be based on the emissions of carbon dioxide CO2- the so-called greenhouse gas blamed for global warming. It would require the data of each car - held by the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency - to be used to give an individual rating for each car.

Paul Smith, from motoring campaign group SafeSpeed, said the Intelligent Speed Adaptation was "fundamentally dangerous".

He said: "It is fundamentally dangerous for drivers to give over control over their vehicles to a satellite system. They will simply put their footdown on the accelerator and rely on the system to slow them down.

"We have a highly developed road safety system in this country with drivers responsible for their own actions. It would be wrong to change the entire system, which ISA does.

"It is like taking a sledgehammer to fix a nut."

_________________
Prepare to be Judged


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 21:56 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
Has a worse smell than the Communist regime.

Regulars will be aware that my wife Wildy :neko: spent 6 months in the old USSR and 6 months in Leipzig during her studies. Her cousin Jessika was in East Berlin in 1989 when the Wall fell as well.

Both these girls report that as "Western visitors".. they fell "under suspicion" and were followed around. Both say that although they were legal in each respect.. the surveillance made them feel "self consciouse .. afraid and almost criminal in that they had something to hide when they did not" :roll:

These are lucid.. above average intelligence and very well educated persons.. and they felt that rather acutely at the time.

Constant surveillance then leads to concentration on being observed .. and not on reality . or danger. and as such can be downright dangerous :banghead:


I will fight as best and as legally as I know how for now.. :wink:

_________________
If you want to get to heaven - you have to raise a little hell!

Smilies are contagious
They are just like the flu
We use our smilies on YOU today
Now Good Causes are smiling too!

KEEP SMILING
It makes folk wonder just what you REALLY got up to last night!

Smily to penny.. penny to pound
safespeed prospers-smiles all round! !

But the real message? SMILE.. GO ON ! DO IT! and the world will smile with you!
Enjoy life! You only have the one bite at it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 22:29 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 21:15
Posts: 699
Location: Belfast
:gatso2: :readit: :typing: I thought I signed a petition against this kind of money-grubbing, intrusive nonsense. Evidently the Government aren't going to listen to 1.8m motorists. The Department for Transport's claim that motorists WILL volunteer is the sinister power of suggestion at work. If you volunteer for that, you truly deserve all you get.

While we're on the subject, didn't the Government say there would be NO TRACKING? If anyone can quote chapter and verse, please enlighten me. What on earth do they want to track fleet vehicles for? Is no-one going to be allowed to do a day or night's work without Government snooping?

_________________
Anyone who tells you that nothing is impossible has never bathed in a saucer of water.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 23:48 
Offline
Suspended
Suspended

Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 21:24
Posts: 103
hows about objecting to it by giving up your job and signing on?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 10:22 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 01:55
Posts: 235
Location: Bristol
I think that's what a lot of people will have to do. My friend has already said that if this road pricing goes ahead he won't be able to travel to work because it'll cost him more than he earns.

Way to go, destroying the economy like that.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 19:48 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 01:51
Posts: 329
What happens if every driver against this in Enland decides to speed on the hour of every hour on the day. IE everyone on the road at about the same time causes a "NIP" to be processed at roughly the same time many times a day?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 15:26 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 11:46
Posts: 125
Squirrel wrote:
My friend has already said that if this road pricing goes ahead he won't be able to travel to work because it'll cost him more than he earns.


Does he flip burgers for MacDonalds at the opposite end of the country to where he lives or something?

I doubt his figures to be honest (not that there are any official figures as far as I'm aware for him to do the calculations).

Much as I am against it, I sense a little hysteria starting to creep in.

Mike.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 15:46 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 14:06
Posts: 3654
Location: Oxfordshire
Even if he can technically afford it, why should he have to sacrifice any quality of life in order to go to work?!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 16:05 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 11:46
Posts: 125
RobinXe wrote:
Even if he can technically afford it, why should he have to sacrifice any quality of life in order to go to work?!


He shouldn't.

I just see that people appear to be blaming the government for a knee-jerk reaction and then doing the same (IMHO)

Mike.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 19:16 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 09:01
Posts: 1548
Quote:
It can also automatically apply the brakes or block the accelerator to prevent a driver from exceeding the speed limit

What a brilliant safety feature
Just as you need to give it an extra spurt because braking will only further endanger you, Nanny will brake for you instead.

I can see the ambulance chasers setting up camp outside A&E already.

On a slightly different note, is it not law that the driver is required to have full control of their vehicle at all times?

_________________
What makes you think I'm drunk officer, have I got a fat bird with me?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 16:26 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2004 02:07
Posts: 242
I would be happy for them to be used for tracking in the case of fighting crime but there should be a proviso that they are not admissible by law with regard to speeding offences.

A system that sends out a "beep" warning when you are over the speed limit but doesn't actually slow you down may be a reasonable option and it might prevent many from driving over the speed limit for any long period because nobody would want to listen to the beeping noise continually, but in the case of an overtaking manouevre where you need to accelerate to pull back in in time, you would still be in control and would obviously tolerate it for those few seconds.

The whole system should also be tied in to track the driver who can activate the car with their licence plus a pin. You would need the pin in case of a licence being stolen. In fact such vehicles could also be used in a "streetcar" system (which already exists) whereby anyone with a licence could use one of a pool of cars when needed paying for whatever they use.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 19:47 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Jul 23, 2006 20:35
Posts: 75
Location: Lincoln
R1Nut wrote:
I would never, ever drive a car that has ISA attached and I wouldn't ride a bike with ISA on it. In both instances it has the potential to kill due to being unable to accelerate out of danger.

Can anyone give me ideas of countries to emigrate where there isn't a 4 year waiting list?


Try Scotland. Language is similar, food is either deep fried or good, (sometimes both), weather is nice in Summer, "Crisp" in Winter, (but midges can be a pain in Summer/Autumn), and upper West Coast climate is warmed by the Gulf Stream, lots of beautiful scenery and good driving roads, (most without cameras or even human habitation for miles), own Parliament, has own laws, (largely more sensible), decent beer and excellent varieties of national spirit, long way from London, (huge plus point), same currency values, much better NHS, free University education............ Need I go on ? Both our children were born in Stirling, (their Mum was there at the time so it was convenient), and we lived there for eight years. Sometimes wonder why we left. (No I don't - my Company moved us and I was a wage-slave).

Consider it seriously(ish). Alternatively you could try Ireland. Much as above but the standard of driving is appalling and Insurance costs are astronomical. Great people, but expensive housing unless you are way out west.

How about Normandy ? I know they're French but they are sensible French, not like Parisians. You would be dead handy for Le Mans every year and the food and Calvados are superb.

Wales ? Cornwall ? No and no. :lol:

_________________
"Experience isn't everything - but it's most of it".

Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.067s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]