suck_my_tailpipe wrote:
Sorry, but I don't share your faith in the veracity of the accused statements.
Seems not unlikely that the dozy mare, bang to rights for causing death by dangerous driving, is casting around, after the fact, for mitigating factors.
I've seen no govt publicity anywhere asserting that if you drive within legal limits you are immune from risk or prosecution, that only speed kills.
Though I have heard and seen many assertions by the anti-limit/camera faction that driving within legal limits makes people inattentive and poor drivers.
So it seems most likely to me that her tactic is inspired/informed/supported/legitimised less by official govt policy on speeding, and more by sites like this.
And were I to suck my own tailpipe you'd be out of a job.
Your writing style suggests intelligence but your lack of understanding suggests otherwise. Her statements are not going to mitigate her offence in any way. She will still receive the same penalty as she would if she simply said she didn't see the pedestrian so the only reason for her comments would be if she actually believed she was safe.
The ONLY road "safety" related advertising we see or hear is "Speed Kills" and "Wipe of 5 and stay alive". It seems that every time there is a crash where someone dies the reports include some mention of speed even though in most cases it did not cause the crash. The only other advertising is “drowsy drivers die” and “drink and drive and you’re a bloody idiot”. So what other message are the general population supposed to infer from this than you are safe if you drive under the speed limit whilst not affected by alcohol and you are not tired? I have never seen any advertising suggesting that you should drive to the conditions or to slow down in the rain or to keep your vision up and ahead.
The only advertising about driving near schools says that the new 40kph (24mph) limits at schools has been introduced to save lives, nothing about watching out for kids between cars, just drive at 40kph and the kiddies will be safe.
The government is sending out a strong anti speed message but NOTHING about improving road courtesy or improving hazard perception or driving to the conditions, ie nothing to improve overall driver behaviour or to reduce the road toll.