Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Tue Jun 16, 2026 20:05

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 368 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 15, 16, 17, 18, 19  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 17:43 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 13:18
Posts: 191
Location: London
And if someone drove a tank over your car, it'd be your fault for not having as much protection as them?

_________________
Occasionally slightly trollish.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 18:01 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 16:24
Posts: 322
Dondare wrote:
Stress comes mostly from the sheer volume of motor-traffic on the roads.


Funny, because driving in Southampton at 2am is very stressful; you keep getting stopped by red traffic lights for no reason when there's nobody else about.

Anyway, increase the number of pedestrians and cyclists, and stress will be worse. Ever been to a shopping centre at Christmas? So many pedestrians that it's stressful. It's not just cars.

Then look at buses, and look how much delay they cause to traffic flow, not helped by local authorities removing bus stop laybys and building traffic islands to prevent overtaking a stopped bus.


Last edited by sotonsteve on Thu Jun 14, 2007 18:04, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 18:02 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 11:46
Posts: 125
To be honest, this is what I'm seeing in this thread.

Image

_________________
www.misspelled-signs.com - A tribute to illiterate signwriters.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 18:07 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 16:24
Posts: 322
Dondare wrote:
And if someone drove a tank over your car, it'd be your fault for not having as much protection as them?


So you're suggesting that we responsible drivers think it's ok to run down a pedestrian because they aren't in a car? Sorry, you're arguement is bollocks; I'm suggesting that everybody should share responsibility in road safety, rather than having the current situation which focuses on motorist=bad, and not teaching people the green cross code, or taking responsibility for their own errors instead of passing the blame.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 18:33 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 15:30
Posts: 643
Dondare wrote:
And if someone drove a tank over your car, it'd be your fault for not having as much protection as them?


It would if I decided to drive across Salisbury Plain when the tanks were driving around. The tank driver would not expect someone to suddenly drive a car in front of his tank and I would get squashed.

Next stupid question?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 18:39 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 09:59
Posts: 3544
Location: Shropshire
Omigod :o
Will to live
Falling
Falling
Falling
Falling
Gone


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 21:05 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
Dondare wrote:
Have you noticed the extraordinary reduction in traffic during the school holidays? How many school runs really need a car? Most are less than a mile.
Even the daily commute to work does not normally involve a motorway, I don't know what the average commute is but I'd bet that half are under five miles. Have you done research into this?


Oh - I dunno.

My own commute's long. My wife's a bit further on. We choose to live here as we love it. I could not bear to live in a 'burb either. But our work colleague's also commute fair distances. Our jobs are not "work from home" as such but I am sure many admin type ones could be on occasion.

Our kids use the school bus services or travel with our teenage drivers on heavy school bag days. :lol:

Two of my sisters and one my brothers live in the Bolton/Manchester loop.
Another reason why I report up much of what gives down in the 'burbs to our South.

OK my point? The two sisters down there are teachers. One works at a school which runs a bus service. Now this school's a nice "academic orientated school". She tells me kids attending this school come from as far as Preston and Rochdale and Warrington to be taught there. She finds that "amazing" when she knows for fact that those areas have schools of equal status (and fees :wink:)



Off topic

:soapbox: rant! Take cover! :bunker:

She did used to teach at a "sink comp" prior to landing this job which she wanted as she felt herself to be "drowning in much harder slog but which could not yield any "government targets". Her sanity could not cope so she jumped ship from her "ideals" because she needed "self protection" :wink: )



Now Jazz's own route to work does not involve a motorway - but she could not do on bicycle because of the weight of marked exercise books and various lesson plans despite what she calls a "generous time table and quiet area to do all the marking/lesson preparation" At her old state comp - she indulged in what she calls the "gimmicky catchee attention but fail miserably with remedial class" style which required many "props" and "differentiated work sheets" whatever they are. But the gist is that it made a commute by bicycle rather difficult.


Jazz's commute is 6 miles along the high volume "direct way" and 8 miles if she chooses a different but less congested route.


My other sister (Ju-Ju) who also teaches similar subjects to Jazz (so - called because she plays brass instruments in a jazz band :lol: She's not that bad now but I can tell you that when she practised as a child - was just one awful din :yikes:) but Ju-ju works at a school in Altrincham area. She has to use the M60 to get there or failing that .. A580/over Warburton toll bridge and via "country lanes"

She says her catchment's from a 5 mile radius but prone to the dreaded school run. Her commute's 11 miles each way using the motorway and 15 miles if she goes the "scenic way".

But with school books, long distance and bicycle routes which would take them along lonely "off road routes" prone to dangers for quite attractive women (and I have to acknowledge that my sisters are all quite pretty enough in feature in sincerity and not because I'd be "burnt toast" to say otherwise in public :lol: )

These girls are not alone either. Most of their colleagues live some distance away and they even note on teacher exam meets that their colleagues are also travellling over 15 miles to work.

Sadly Dondare - lot of folk want to live in nice leafy burbs or in the country outskirts of out towns. People recruit "best for job" and it's not always possible to up sticks and move to the town where the employer's based. Julie (We call her Ju-Ju in the family ) knows of someone who lives in Wilmslow and works in Oldham. The person just does not want to live in Oldham but likes the job there. :roll:

I fear the norm. We cannot all live near our work. Firms do fold. Hospitals have been laying off staff too. We cannot just sell house and buy another where we find the next job either. What if that job then becomes redundant and we then end up finding work back where we started? Given the spiralling cost of property - not an option really.

I could sell my house here but to buy something similar would require a new mortgage at current price.

As for the school runs?

Oh - we have the problem of school books and various heavy kits on occasion.

Parents moving out of catchment area but keeping child at the desired school

Cheating to get child in preferred school by renting house in catchment - then moving back "home" when sorted :roll: But commuting in car all the same :roll:


People are also scared of kiddy fiddlers per media hype. I fear worsened all the more by what happened in Portugal recently too. From fostering and adoption - I am more than aware that the dangers are closer to home in reality with the Maddy McCann/Sarah Payne etc cases being few and far between. But these cases when they occur hardly help when base panic instinct seems to be a "stampede in a car to school"

Dondare - BMA today calls for "over indulging kids or killing by "kindness"" to be classed as "neglect". I am inclined to be more in agreement on this one. We are indeed running serious dangers to human health, society and welfare by refusing loosen the toddler reins within reason.

My wife's family might be large - but I think my own more than matches :lol: But my family's not as crazy as hers ::hehe:

_________________
If you want to get to heaven - you have to raise a little hell!

Smilies are contagious
They are just like the flu
We use our smilies on YOU today
Now Good Causes are smiling too!

KEEP SMILING
It makes folk wonder just what you REALLY got up to last night!

Smily to penny.. penny to pound
safespeed prospers-smiles all round! !

But the real message? SMILE.. GO ON ! DO IT! and the world will smile with you!
Enjoy life! You only have the one bite at it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 21:24 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
By the way Dondare. I think you already know this anyway as your posts are fair and not at all hostile in my opinion anyway

But I think most of us on this board respect other road users. We are not at all "anti-cycling".

We want safety for all. We try to post up what we think to be "decently good practice" in the vague hope that we may help get some thought into the skills required of all road users into positive psyche.

However, we must always take into account very different needs and what you and me may think "big girls' blouse" excuses may actually be valid for that case.

I have some patients who appear "healthy" but who would be "pooped out completely" after a 1 mile ride. Society is made up of people with very different needs and we cannot ever ever lump together in an idealistic "one size fits all". This applies to health needs as much as education needs and ability limits. :wink:

But rest assured - most of us do accept we share a road with others and we do indeed give way to our more vulnerable as respect and courtesy as well as safety.

We all know rude inconsiderate louts exist of course. We all have to defend ourselves whichever way we can against these w :censored: rs :wink:

_________________
If you want to get to heaven - you have to raise a little hell!

Smilies are contagious
They are just like the flu
We use our smilies on YOU today
Now Good Causes are smiling too!

KEEP SMILING
It makes folk wonder just what you REALLY got up to last night!

Smily to penny.. penny to pound
safespeed prospers-smiles all round! !

But the real message? SMILE.. GO ON ! DO IT! and the world will smile with you!
Enjoy life! You only have the one bite at it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 21:25 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
OK- lets start talking bout limits and sense - on my way home ,both routes are 20.

One route - the first mile is sensible at 20(MAX, and what a safe driver would do ) - the council have created a parking bay on one side of the road, making the gap between parked cars and the centre line reduced, and blocking views of pedestrians trying to cross - so ok - i agree. Slightly further up, still cars parked in this council created bay, on wide pavement on other side ,residents have parked on odge of pavement - so hazard density is increased , my normal speed is 15 or so , due to on one side being forced close to parked cars, on other, proximity of cars to edge of road. Further up road is free from parked cars. 20 still applies.All through this humps are present. With the road hazards present - the humps should not be necessary, the hazards demand ( IMHO) 20. So - what is necessary - lower limits or better traffic management.

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 21:28 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
Rigpig wrote:
Omigod :o
Will to live
Falling
Falling
Falling
Falling
Gone



I think I fell down an abyss a long time ago. Or was it the gas works :lol: :scratchchin:

Whatever.. I think we have to get the "residential/village v A road" into perspective.

_________________
If you want to get to heaven - you have to raise a little hell!

Smilies are contagious
They are just like the flu
We use our smilies on YOU today
Now Good Causes are smiling too!

KEEP SMILING
It makes folk wonder just what you REALLY got up to last night!

Smily to penny.. penny to pound
safespeed prospers-smiles all round! !

But the real message? SMILE.. GO ON ! DO IT! and the world will smile with you!
Enjoy life! You only have the one bite at it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 21:53 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Mad Moggie wrote:
Rigpig wrote:
Omigod :o
Will to live
Falling
Falling
Falling
Falling
Gone



I think I fell down an abyss a long time ago. Or was it the gas works :lol: :scratchchin:

Whatever.. I think we have to get the "residential/village v A road" into perspective.


Perhaps what is needed is "A road, bypassing village" +road into village , rather than trying to fool the motoring public with the "VILLAGE, village only " signs. The villagers as residents and roadusers pay tax - surely both they and the motoring public should expect to have a road system ( in this day and age ) that by passes villages on the trunk network.(Or is that too much to ask ??

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 22:01 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Mike_B wrote:
To be honest, this is what I'm seeing in this thread.

Image


Very pretty, but probably not very helpful. I've seen substantial efforts on both sides to reach common understanding and we should welcome any progress that we can make.

Was that done in a flowcharting programme or a paint programme? I'm looking for a flowcharting program and haven't got around to affording a copy of Visio...

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 22:23 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 13:18
Posts: 191
Location: London
Mike_B wrote:
To be honest, this is what I'm seeing in this thread.

Image



Sometimes your replies indicate that you have not understood. By all means disagree with me, but don't disagree with something I've not said.

_________________
Occasionally slightly trollish.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 22:30 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 13:18
Posts: 191
Location: London
semitone wrote:
Dondare wrote:
And if someone drove a tank over your car, it'd be your fault for not having as much protection as them?


It would if I decided to drive across Salisbury Plain when the tanks were driving around. The tank driver would not expect someone to suddenly drive a car in front of his tank and I would get squashed.

Next stupid question?


There is absolutely no way that roads in residential areas should be comparable to Salisbury Plain during an army exercise.

But my tank analogy is probably not worth picking up on. I'll find a better way to reply to the previous post.

_________________
Occasionally slightly trollish.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 01:20 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 11:46
Posts: 125
SafeSpeed wrote:
Very pretty, but probably not very helpful. I've seen substantial efforts on both sides to reach common understanding and we should welcome any progress that we can make.

Apologies then in that case, It just seemed to me to be going round and round in circles on the same point.

SafeSpeed wrote:
Was that done in a flowcharting programme or a paint programme? I'm looking for a flowcharting program and haven't got around to affording a copy of Visio...

It was about 5 minutes work in PowerPoint 2003. Using the flowchart symbols and the 'elbow arrow connectors'.

I use Visio at work and it is very useful. May be a bit of an overkill for the occasional flowchart though.

_________________
www.misspelled-signs.com - A tribute to illiterate signwriters.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 09:52 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 20:28
Posts: 1267
Location: not too far in front, not too far behind.
Mike_B wrote:
SafeSpeed wrote:
Was that done in a flowcharting programme or a paint programme? I'm looking for a flowcharting program and haven't got around to affording a copy of Visio...

It was about 5 minutes work in PowerPoint 2003. Using the flowchart symbols and the 'elbow arrow connectors'.

I use Visio at work and it is very useful. May be a bit of an overkill for the occasional flowchart though.


You can do much the same - and for free, Paul, which may be of use to you - using the presentation element of Open Office. Version 2.2.1 is available for download now: http://www.openoffice.org/

it comes with the useful capability for saving any document as a PDF.

As well as Impress (the presentation package) it now has a modue called Draw: http://www.openoffice.org/product/draw.html

_________________
COAST Not just somewhere to keep a beach.

A young loner on a crusade to champion the cause of the innocent, the helpless, the powerless, in a world of criminals who operate above the law.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 15:24 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 16:24
Posts: 322
Dondare wrote:
semitone wrote:
Dondare wrote:
And if someone drove a tank over your car, it'd be your fault for not having as much protection as them?


It would if I decided to drive across Salisbury Plain when the tanks were driving around. The tank driver would not expect someone to suddenly drive a car in front of his tank and I would get squashed.

Next stupid question?


There is absolutely no way that roads in residential areas should be comparable to Salisbury Plain during an army exercise.

But my tank analogy is probably not worth picking up on. I'll find a better way to reply to the previous post.


Hmm, yeah. I don't recall ever seeing a tank in the city driving on a public road.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 15:29 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 16:24
Posts: 322
The other day, a pensioner got confused and drove his mobility scooter onto the M27.

I saw a reader comment laughing it off and saying "no harm done". Is it any wonder road safety is an issue when people laugh off dangerous things like this?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 17:05 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 02:25
Posts: 331
sotonsteve wrote:
Dondare wrote:
semitone wrote:
Dondare wrote:
And if someone drove a tank over your car, it'd be your fault for not having as much protection as them?


It would if I decided to drive across Salisbury Plain when the tanks were driving around. The tank driver would not expect someone to suddenly drive a car in front of his tank and I would get squashed.

Next stupid question?


There is absolutely no way that roads in residential areas should be comparable to Salisbury Plain during an army exercise.

But my tank analogy is probably not worth picking up on. I'll find a better way to reply to the previous post.


Hmm, yeah. I don't recall ever seeing a tank in the city driving on a public road.


I have. There is a man who has had several planning run ins with Croydon Council (one over a stuffed marlin he caught that he mounted on the roof of his house). So he bought himself an tracked APC and a few other old military vehicles and used too drive them round the center of Croydon. :loco:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 19:42 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
sotonsteve wrote:
The other day, a pensioner got confused and drove his mobility scooter onto the M27.

I saw a reader comment laughing it off and saying "no harm done". Is it any wonder road safety is an issue when people laugh off dangerous things like this?


I think the same "laugh off" occurred on the three instances so far reported in the press over cyclists on the hard shoulder of a motorway :yikes: (We even got from the muesli munching militia that they should be allowed to ride on the hard shoulder :rolleyes:)

Dondare/Peyote/A and B Cyclists and the Flying Dodo /nutty nuts about cycling who are most probably like me and my wife (and indeed them other ruddy hooligans we are related to :lol:) want safety first. They would probably acknowledge that a call to abide by 20 to 40 mph speed limits on residential to urbans would be desirable. However - the call from those militants of the "Criminal Mass psyche" does not add up when they profess to wanting very low speed limits but appear to want to ride on 70 mph motorways as well. Does not do any commitment to promoting cycling any good at all. :roll:

In any case- have to say it. Motorways might be the fastest way for me to get from one end of the country to another - but to get locally from A to B - they are not the shortest distance either. They serve a purpose in the same way as the train lines. That's all. I cannot see any advantage in the militant muesli munchers' complaints on that issue.

Other than try to impose cycling on those who don't want or even cannot do for various reasons :popcorn:

Do not mis-read or misinterpret - old lurks :wink:

I actually advise my patients to either go on the spin machines at the gym to build up stamina of better still cycle in the fresh air and countryside to get a double whammy of health benefit to them within their own capabilities. But I have to accept some patients simply cannot - because they are too weak, suffer athritis, chronic heart disease due to lurgy attack and I have them then on a transplant listing.

But I think we have to know when to draw a line and motorways/70 mph duals are not really the place for pedestrians/cyclists/moped users or those using these mobility scooters :yikes:

I appreciate some confusion and I will even concede that the big rectangular sign stating that these roads are forbidden to certain road users at each slip road seems to have vanished these days :roll: but even so - this is basic Highway Code stuff. :roll:


I still say all should be tested on this at least every other year. :roll: Regardless of age too. :wink:

Heck - am a bit draconian in demand really :lol:

_________________
If you want to get to heaven - you have to raise a little hell!

Smilies are contagious
They are just like the flu
We use our smilies on YOU today
Now Good Causes are smiling too!

KEEP SMILING
It makes folk wonder just what you REALLY got up to last night!

Smily to penny.. penny to pound
safespeed prospers-smiles all round! !

But the real message? SMILE.. GO ON ! DO IT! and the world will smile with you!
Enjoy life! You only have the one bite at it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 368 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 15, 16, 17, 18, 19  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.118s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]