Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Fri Sep 19, 2025 12:06

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2007 08:46 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
I recorded an interview for Tonight with Trevor MacDonald about 10 days ago in London, but my contact there thinks I've ended up on the cutting room floor.

The programme goes out this evening at 8pm, I believe.

Safe Speed issued the following PR yesterday at 12:36 pm:

PR520: Driver distraction in the news

news: EMBARGO 00:01am Friday 6th July 2007

Friday evening's 'Tonight with Trevor MacDonald' deals with driver distraction
and a new press release from Swinton Insurance (copied below with permission)
warns that drivers are becoming confused about what they may and may not do
while driving.

Paul Smith, founder of SafeSpeed.org.uk, said: "Managing distraction is a key
driver skill. Often we talk about 'concentration' instead, but of course that's
the other side of the same coin. Some estimates put driver distraction as a
contributory factor in around three-quarters of all crashes, so clearly driver
distraction is extremely important to road safety."

"The 'trick' that drivers must perform is not to 'avoid all distractions', but
to ensure that the road always has sufficient attention. With the attention
demands of the road varying over a wide range, drivers normally do have spare
capacity for other tasks. Many of these other tasks are routine and perfectly
normal like retuning the radio or conversing with a passenger."

"The message to policy makers is this: Giving drivers long lists of 'dos' and
'don'ts' simply isn't productive. Instead we must help drivers to manage
distraction and ensure that they always have sufficient attention for the road
ahead. Since this is 'skill based' rather than 'rules based' we run the risk of
causing confusion - as shown by the new Swinton survey - and confusion makes
matters worse not better."

"We should not fall into the trap of trying to determine safety by observing
what drivers are doing with their hands. Being in proper control is much more a
matter of what drivers are doing with their eyes and their mind."

<ends>

Notes for editors
=================



Swinton PR wrote:
CONFUSED MOTORISTS DRIVING ON THE WRONG SIDE OF THE LAW SAYS SWINTON

Complete confusion exists on Britain's roads as clueless drivers are mystified
over what constitutes legal and illegal behaviour behind the wheel says
Swinton.

Figures revealed by the leading high street insurance retailer highlight
widespread confusion surrounding what constitutes a driving offence on today's
roads and the broker is calling for a tighter definition of the law to prevent
drivers getting points on their licence or being disqualified.

Over three quarters of drivers think it's perfectly legal to change a CD, hold
a partner's hand or light a cigarette when driving whereas nearly two thirds of
people think it's illegal to apply lipstick when behind the wheel.

The population is split over whether it's legal to eat a sandwich at the wheel
or not, with 51% of the 2,400 drivers questioned in a YouGov survey
commissioned by Swinton considering this as illegal behaviour.

The truth is that any of these, or other acts including reading a map on your
lap or resting your arms on the steering wheel could be considered illegal in
the eyes of the law if the driver is deemed not to be in full control of the
vehicle.

Swinton's motor insurance division is concerned that this level of
misunderstanding could result in drivers unwittingly breaking the law - facing
a hefty fine or even disqualification for driving without due care and
attention.

The Road Traffic Act 1988 states that, "If a person drives a motor vehicle on a
road without due care and attention, or without reasonable consideration for
other persons using the road, he is guilty of an offence."; Punishments for
careless and inconsiderate driving can include a maximum fine of £2,500, up to
nine points on your licence or disqualification*.

Swinton's chief executive, Patrick Smith said: "We are warning drivers to be
vigilant when behind the wheel because the law is so ambiguous. Unwittingly
breaking this law could result in points - again piling up the number of
penalty points people already have on their licence because of speed cameras."

Chris Collings, insurer development director at Swinton said: "Our survey
reveals the extent of confusion surrounding what people can and can't do at the
wheel. Drivers need to completely understand the principal road safety laws if
they are to adhere to them - not knowing whether an act is legal or illegal is
an extremely dangerous position for drivers to be in."

"Nearly all drivers questioned know that it's illegal to use a mobile phone
when driving, which is good news but we need to gain this level of certainty
for all the other actions undertaken."

"Whether a person is in full control of a vehicle or not remains at the
discretion of a police officer and is therefore ambiguous. The confusion
highlighted in our survey must be removed so that safe, law-abiding drivers
aren't unwittingly acting illegally."

Efforts to dispel the confusion comes as the Driving Standards Authority
proposes 30 new rules to add to the new edition of the highway code - including
smoking at the wheel. Breaking these rules can result in drivers being handed a
fixed penalty of up to £60, at the discretion of the police**.

- ENDS -

* Information according to motoring offence lawyers, lawyersmotoringlaw.co.uk
www.lawyersmotoringlaw.co.uk <http://www.lawyersmotoringlaw.co.uk>

** Information according to the Driving Standards Authority www.dsa.gov.uk <
http://www.dsa.gov.uk>


Notes to editors

The YouGov survey, commissioned by Swinton, consisted of 2,408 drivers from
across the UK

Survey results

Question: Which, if any, of the following actions do you think are currently
UNLAWFUL to do while driving a car?

Action %
Holding your mobile phone to your ear and having a conversation 94
Send a text message 86
Watching a DVD movie on the screen on the dashboard 75
Reading a map on your lap 65
Applying lipstick or makeup 57
Eating a sandwich 51
Making a 'v'; sign at a bad driver 29
Resting your arms on the steering wheel 26
Lighting a cigarette 25
Holding your partner's hand 25
Changing a CD or tape 24
Watching the screen of a satellite navigation system on the dashboard 20
Changing the volume by twiddling the car stereo control 15
Carrying a crate of beer on the back seat 8
Singing along to music 1
None of these 1



Some important issues raised in this little lot. Comments?

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2007 11:05 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 15:30
Posts: 643
The last thing we need is more strict laws with fixed penalty fines. The only thing that needs to be done is to raise public awareness that anything that causes a distraction could lead to a conviction for driving without due care and attention.

The distraction effect depends upon the circumstances and sometimes you have little choice. If you are trying to find an address you are likely to need either sat nav (possible distraction) or a map. If you use a map you either have to be able to stop and look at it (not always possible e.g. motorways or main routes in cities) or have a very good memory.

Drinking from a bottle of water is unlikely to cause a problem when travelling in a straight line but could be dangerous on a twisty road.

Obviously some things are completely unneccessary while driving such as applying makeup (lipstick doesn't look good on me anyway :D ) but even that would be perfectly safe if the car was stopped in a queue of traffic.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2007 11:16 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
What, you mean rather like using a handheld mobile while stationary in traffic with the engine running? :)

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2007 21:48 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 00:42
Posts: 310
Location: North West England
The 'tests' were a joke. For those who didn't catch it they asked a mum with several years experience and a new driver to drive around cones and do 3-point turns while being deliberately distracted by tasks like counting out 87p, answering the phone, eating a sandwich and spelling Barnsley backwards!! Just like real life.

I mean I have seen a white van man trying to reverse a trailer into a drive while on the phone - and making a hash of - but most of us will stop all peripheral activity if things get at all tricky and change CDs, sip a drink etc at a well chosen moment - we must do because if we didn't the road death rate would be in six figures.

There is a problem with people trying to run their lifes while driving but this tosh didn't move things on one jot. Yet another lost opportunity on TV. And I'm pretty sure Paul didn't appear, the captioning was a bit haphazard but as none of the talking heads did anything but state the bl**ding obvious I'm guessing none were he.

Barkstar

_________________
The difference between intelligence and stupidity is that intelligence has limits.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2007 22:05 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 15:30
Posts: 643
Quote:
distracted by tasks like counting out 87p


That proves they should scrap tolls though!! Just think how dangerous it is counting out the money for the Dartford crossing :D


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 07, 2007 00:53 
Offline
Former Police Officer
Former Police Officer
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 00:27
Posts: 351
I think that we (Paul) had a lucky escape not being included in this program.

It was as has been said utter tosh, every driver in the country will who watched it will have seen through the contrived tests they ran and come to the conclusion that it was an irrelevence.

Brian Delany of the IAM, was trying to make some serious points about distraction but he was intermingled with these unrealistic tests which completely diluted his message and at the base level probably turned people off the IAM - "if he thinks that we all drive like that then the IAM is completely out of touch"

The only bit that really covered a road safety message where they referred to a driver who hit a ped on a pelican crossing whilst changing a cassette was so focussed on the emotional impact on her, ("glamour television" perhaps?) that the actual message again was lost.

Lazy journalism and I for one think it was lucky you were not tarred with such a poor program. As stated above a terrible lost opportunity.

_________________
Former Military Police Officer and accident investigator


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 07, 2007 08:39 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 21:18
Posts: 92
One of the worst "investigations" I have seen on TV since....well, the last Tonight I watched about driving, probably.

Who on earth would think about counting out 87pence of coins whilst reversing into a parking space?

The whole argument at the end seemed to be based on not even being able to have a conversation with anyone whilst driving or you will stop in even less time than if you were drunk (did they prove this? - no). If this is the case, then why did the start of the program have the drivers talking about their driving into the in car camera if it is such a dangerous activity? In summary - talking whilst driving = dangerous, but we'll get people to do it anyway. Total garbage.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 17:11 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 00:01
Posts: 2258
Location: South Wales
semitone wrote:
Quote:
distracted by tasks like counting out 87p


That proves they should scrap tolls though!! Just think how dangerous it is counting out the money for the Dartford crossing :D


This is a bloody good point.

Even if you have the right money ready, you still have to get it out of your trouser pocket while approaching, and still have to store the recipt in your wallet while leaving (lest you piss off the guy behind)

They should at least get rid of the sillier priced ones, like £1.30 for the Mersey tunnel and £5.10 for the Severn bridge


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.027s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]