Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Wed Jun 10, 2026 02:07

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 18:32 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 19:50
Posts: 3369
Location: Lost in the Wilderness
Daily Mail

Quote:
Half of all criminals aren't even hauled before a court
By JAMES SLACK - More by this author
Last updated at 12:12pm on 18th July 2007

Fewer than half of criminals supposedly "brought to justice" suffered the humiliation of being hauled before the courts last year.

Instead, they escaped with on-the-spot fines, cautions and warnings, said the chief inspector of the Crown Prosecution Service.

Stephen Wooler said that the "over-zealous" use of such penalties - rather than taking criminals to court - could damage public confidence.

And, in his annual report, he warned yesterday that the public could begin to view the criminal justice system as a "revenue-raising initiative".

As recently as 2003, 68 per cent of offences brought to justice involved convictions in the courts. But Mr Wooler said that, last year, the figure was between 40 and 50 per cent.

The court conviction figures reflect the dramatic changes made to the justice system by Labour, forced through despite protests from crime victims and opposition MPs. Cannabis possession is now punished by a simple ticking-off, since the controversial decision to downgrade the drug to Class C in 2004.

And on-the-spot fines have been introduced for shoplifting, criminal damage, being drunk and disorderly and other yobbish crimes. Only half are ever paid.

There has also been a sharp rise in cautions, with 8,000 rapists and other sex offenders being let off with a mere reprimand over the past five years.

In 2005, the latest year for which total figures are available, some 51,000 violent attackers were simply handed a caution, which carries no criminal or financial penalty - an increase of more than a third on 2004.

This includes 757 who inflicted potentially fatal wounds and 588 who threatened to murder their victim.

In total, 299,000 cautions were handed out - up 17 per cent on 2004.

This includes 199,000 children given reprimands or final warnings. There were also 146,500 drunks, thieves and thugs who escaped with onthe-spot fines and 57,700 cannabis smokers given a ticking-off.

Some 22 rapists were cautioned. Most were either elderly or very young, or committed the offence many years ago. A total of 390 were let off with a caution for having under-age sex and three for child porn offences.

Under the Government's rules for counting the number of offenders brought to justice - a key police target - fines and cautions carry the same weight as a conviction through the courts.

Critics, including rank-and-file police, say this has placed enormous pressure on officers to take the easier option.

Mr Wooler's report said that a snapshot survey, taken in February this year, found 49 per cent of offences brought to justice - all the crimes which police counted as solved - were convictions in court.

A further 8.9 per cent were offences "taken into consideration", where an offender being prosecuted admits to other crimes.

A staggering 26 per cent were cautions, 9.6 per cent were fixed-penalty notices, onthespot fines, and 6.5 per cent were formal warnings for cannabis possession.

Mr Wooler said: "Typically, prosecutions now account for between 40 and 50 per cent of the offences brought to justice within a criminal justice area.

"The power to fine is now vested in many authorities and brings the risk that overzealous use may lead groups of citizens to believe that they are in reality the subject of a revenue-raising initiative."

He added that, if officials are "incentivised" to hand out as many fines as possible, this could cause "substantial damage to public confidence".

Only 42 per cent of the public currently believe criminal justice agencies are effective in punishing criminals, according to research cited by Mr Wooler.

Yesterday it also emerged that in one city, Exeter, the number of cautions alone is the same as the number of court prosecutions.

In 2006 927 offenders were cautioned, warned or reprimanded while 932 were prosecuted, according to figures released under the Freedom of Information Act.

Crimes for which cautions were handed out included sexual offences, assault, fraud, forgery, drugs offences and criminal damage.

Shadow Home Secretary David Davis said: "It is disgraceful that so many crimes are going effectively unpunished.

"This a consequence of Labour's policy of keeping criminals out of the justice system at all costs - but passing cautions so that they can claim a crime has been dealt with.

"This is all to fiddle the figures, while doing nothing to tackle the scourge of rising crime on our streets."


Quote:
And, in his annual report, he warned yesterday that the public could begin to view the criminal justice system as a "revenue-raising initiative".


When you look at the way they're treating the motorist, it can't be viewed any other way.

_________________
Useless laws weaken necessary laws.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 03:31 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 01:16
Posts: 917
Location: Northern England
For once I have to agree with the "Daily Mail".... Dixie.

It's just a pity that they have only just seen the light when it has been going on for the last 30 yrs at least. And it's NOT just the Judicial system..

The Hospitals were starved of cash to the point where they threw out the old folk from their beds. The lowly paid hospital cleaners were "privatised", given a big pay cut and twice the work. Wards were closed and nurses sacked in order to save money and employ more highly payed Managers.. who's job it was to look for more cuts! Result?.......MRSA.

Organised Public Transport was thrown to the wolves by means of deregulation (accompanied with a cut in Gov. money for same, to the Councils). Private Buses now rule who only run when profits can be maximised by; "Packing 'em in like sardines" and then charging more; "At busy times" :roll: and your council gets ....NOTHING now for transport. So, it asks YOU for more instead via your rates.

The Railways were starved of cash for decades. But I can see that many different things were tried in terms of single line working and things like; Railbuses. Then, they closed all the Branch lines that fed the main lines. I STILL feel that overall, it was a grave mistake and a longer term view would have been better. The closing of these lines and services lead to a far greater increase in road traffic in the years that followed. The man in charge was following a profit driven motive focused only on his own industry rather than one of national benefit and we are now suffering as a result.


Jails, Ah there now is the problem...
In the crime wave that followed the great "de-industrialisation" of Britain, ordinary people were "abandoned" by the Police because the jails were filling up and the courts were told NOT to sentence them to jail anyway. The automation (privatisation) of road policing began, in order to cut costs further.
Everyone said it was "crazy" but they were ignored because they were poor and had no wealth or influence.
Wealthy ex "Rock Stars" can even now get an instant response to a burglary (fingerprint team an' all) DITTO for Politicians...
All that we, (down in the swamps) get, is; "Have they gone Sir?" (they're always very polite whilst stuffing you...they're taught how to do that y'know).....Ah well, never mind Sir, here's a number Sir,........stick it up your......arrrrrrrrr.......but now it's affecting the richer people and they have just NOW discovered that something is wrong!..

Yes folks! Jails ARE expensive to build and run and it needs people to PAY taxes to do it. But in the end it's FAR MORE expensive NOT TO! The only difference at the moment is; the Government aren't the ones picking up the bill.

I could go on, but I'm tired....and you'll get the picture anyway I know.

Our recent history is one of constant cuts and "abandonment" by Governments of ALL parties when it comes to providing our services.

In order to balance their books, They've passed the cost of essential services directly to us via profit hungry private markets.
They can then stand back and say: "Nuthin' to do with us guv!"......


Yeah right!.............. :roll:

Trust the "Daily mail"................. 30 yrs behind the Times!








:lol: :D :) Ah! Ah! ......... see what I did there folks? strange innit what a capital letter will do... :)


As old Jack Warner would have said: " 'evenin' all"............


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 09:41 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 13:36
Posts: 1339
Reading the Daily Mail always feels like wading through muck. They always go out of their way to show substantial ignorance of any topic under discussion, even if their eventual conclusion is broadly right. For example:

Quote:
Fewer than half of criminals supposedly "brought to justice" suffered the humiliation of being hauled before the courts last year.


Don't they know that for most summary offences it was already possible to plead guilty by post?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.024s | 10 Queries | GZIP : Off ]