Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Thu Jun 11, 2026 05:28

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Fuel price economics
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 16:09 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
There's a big kick off on fuel price protests, and any protest needs to be fuelled (!) by the right information.

The high price of fuel is caused by rises in the international price of oil. Some are arguing that this has nothing to do with government.

HOWEVER when the international price of oil rises the government gets a huge tax windfall from two main sources:

- extra VAT paid on fuel sales
- extra revenue on North Sea Oil

It's my position that the government MUST share this windfall by reducing fuel duty. They have no excuse for increasing their income at our expense.

I urgently need to develop this argument with accurate numbers and references sources. Can anyone help? I'm a bit lost in a sea of unfamiliar websites, even less familiar economic terms and unconfirmable data.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 16:33 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
This is helpful:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jh ... uel125.xml

Quote:
Protest over £3bn fuel tax windfall
By Robert Winnett
Last Updated: 1:07am GMT 29/10/2007

The sharp rise in the price of North Sea oil this year will generate enough to fund a 6p cut in fuel duty

Gordon Brown is under pressure to suspend rises in fuel duty after it emerged that the Treasury is set to pick up an unexpected £3 billion tax windfall from the soaring price of oil.

Farmers and road hauliers threatened the Prime Minister last night with nationwide fuel protests in the run-up to Christmas unless the Government passed on some of the extra income to motorists. The price of oil has risen by 50 per cent this year, with the AA predicting that the cost of a litre of petrol will pass through the £1 barrier for the first time in the next two to three weeks.

A litre of diesel hit a record high of more than £1 last Friday. Despite this, ministers have pushed ahead with a 2p rise in petrol duty this month and are planning another 2p rise in April, followed by yet another increase in 2009.

According to an analysis by the accountants Grant Thornton, the sharp rise in the price of North Sea oil this year will generate an extra £3 billion for the Treasury – enough to fund a 6p cut in fuel duty.

David Handley, the chairman of Farmers for Action, which organised the fuel blockades in 2000, said last night: "It looks like we may well take to the streets again. We are now in serious dialogue. If something is not done imminently, Gordon Brown is going to have a bloody nose. The run-up to Christmas is when something will be done."

Roger King, the chief executive of the Road Haulage Association, said his members were furious at the Government's "twisted logic" on fuel prices.

He added: "The Government is already getting significant amounts of money from north sea oil price rises they hadn't budgeted on, so why can't they leave fuel duty alone?"

Earlier in the year, the Treasury forecast that the oil price would average $68 a barrel this year. This would enable the Government to raise £7.5 billion from various taxes levied on North Sea oil. However, the price of oil has risen by almost 50 per cent since the beginning of the year and is now above $85 a barrel. Experts believe it will continue rising. At current levels, the price rise will raise an extra £3 billion annually.

Last year, the Government announced it would begin increasing fuel duty again after freezing the tax following sharp rises in the price of oil.

Sheila Rainger, the head of campaigns for the RAC Foundation, said: "With the vast increase in the price of crude oil there should be a variable part of fuel duty which can be cut to absorb some of the price rises for motorists."

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 16:38 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 16:04
Posts: 816
Quote:
£3 billion tax windfall


I would be certain that went to the Northern Rock.

_________________
Prepare to be Judged


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 21:02 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
It's looking like the nasty Mr Brown is sitting on a £5 billion fuel tax windfall.

It's up to an annualised £3.5b on North Sea oil since the oil price has continued to rise, and about £1.5b on increased VAT on fuel.

The £5bn windfall is sufficient for him to drop 10p per litre off of fuel duty. This would bring the Treasury back to where it was if the international price of oil had not risen, and it would bring most pump prices comfortably under £1 per litre.

The message has to be:

Don't be greedy Gordon; share your winnings with the people.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 02:17 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon May 07, 2007 14:05
Posts: 498
Another point... the price per barrell reached approx $96-98 at it's peak a couple of weeks back did it not? That was after having risen steadily through the 90's during November. This rise was reflected at the pump, going from just 94p/l at start of November (I did a long trip on 2nd, and remember what I paid) to the whopping 102.9-105.9 (depending where) we are paying today.

Why then, when the barrel price has now dropped to $88, are we still paying 102.9-105.9 p/l ? Why aren't drops reflected at the pump, but rises are?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 20:25 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/evandavis/2007/11/oil_prices.html

OK, the article is a bit wandering. The views of others after it are interesting.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.018s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]