weepej wrote:
Thatsnews wrote:
weepej wrote:
bombus wrote:
lots of words
...with no evidence that it is not an assertion to say that the majority don't support speed cameras.
Weepej, prove it. Prove what you say. Why doncha?

I can't, its an assertion from me, the opposite side of the assertion bombus made.
Oh. I see. The majority of people I have spoken to are in two camps. Totally against speed cameras or in favour of them but they believe many of them are placed in locations to just make money, so really must be counted in the anti-camp.
I expect Bombus is coming from the same position.
You, however, admit that you made a baseless statement.
That's not clever and nor does it advance the debate. Other forum users must now be thinking: "I wonder how much else of what Weepej said was just an assertion from Weepej, based on no facts of any kind, but on baseless speculation?"
You are not doing yourself any favours, are you?
