Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sat Jun 27, 2026 03:27

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 20:39 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 19:50
Posts: 3369
Location: Lost in the Wilderness
Noticed this on MCN

Quote:
Ken Livingstone ‘costing lives’
By Steve Farrell
12 February 2008 11:58

Ken Livingstone could be causing injuries and deaths by suppressing findings which could dramatically cut road casualties, Tory MPs are set to tell Parliament.

Read the report TfL doesn’t want you to see
Ken Livingstone's plans to lower the speed limit to 20mph

They say Ken Livingstone is to blame for failing to cut casualties because he has hidden research on the effects of letting motorcycles use bus lanes.

A leaked report on a three-year pilot states collisions fell by 42% on routes where motorcycles were allowed to share the lanes. The report is dated September 2007 but a date has yet to be set for the findings to be officially released.

Robert Goodwill, shadow minister for motorcycles, said: “Ken is directly responsible for not being able to reduce accidents by 42% and people will have been seriously injured and possibly killed in the meantime.”

Bill Wiggin MP, chairman of All-Party Parliamentary Group on Motorcycling, said: “What I’ve done is to forward this on to my front bench colleagues in the Conservative Party so that we can raise this with the Government.”

“We’re looking for opportunities at the moment through questions, written questions, parliamentary debates and adjournment debates,” he added.

Goodwill and Wiggin believe Livingstone fears opening more bus lanes to motorcycles will cost him the pro-cycling ‘green vote’ in May’s Mayoral election.
They claim that under a Conservative government bus lanes would be opened to motorcycles “universally”.

Roger Evans, Chair of the Transport Committee on the London Assembly, said: "I wish I could say this was shocking but sadly this is all too typical of the way the Mayor and his team operate.

"Any evidence that contradicts their pre-determined viewpoint is ignored or distorted. In this case, Transport for London decided that they did not want motorcyclists to use bus lanes so when this report showed that their doing so would reduce accidents, pedestrian casualties and collisions between motorcyclists and cyclists they buried it and ordered that it be substantially rewritten.

"I’m pleased that the truth about the way that TfL and the Mayor operate has come out."

TfL said in a statement: “There are serious issues of safety and efficiency involved in this issue, which required proper consideration based upon the collection and analysis of the relevant evidence.

"Our officers had concerns about the validity of some of the early results of the study, which were shared by Greater London Authority officials. Further work has been carried out and when our senior officers are satisfied that their concerns have been met the report will be submitted to the Mayor.''

_________________
Useless laws weaken necessary laws.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 22:45 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 02:25
Posts: 331
This has been going on for a month or more. MCN claim to have comms that show a request to edit the report to bring out different conclusions and drop reference appendices.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 01:42 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 23:42
Posts: 620
Location: Colchester, Essex
Livingstone? TfL? Distorting data to fit their own ends? Shurely shome mishtake..?

_________________
Aquila



Licat volare si super tergum aquila volat...


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 02:41 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 01:16
Posts: 917
Location: Northern England
I hadn't seen this before Dixie, thanks for bringing it to our attention. It seems an eminently sensible solution to me. Like Cyclists using pavements, it seems like a good idea to me.

Knowing modern day management like I do. Maybe there's a bit of: "Bum saving" going on...... (in the event of there being an increase in accidents after the change).
So it's: "I'm" changin' nuffin'!"......Roight?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.047s | 10 Queries | GZIP : Off ]