Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sat Apr 25, 2026 21:15

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 464 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 24  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 19:24 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 16:52
Posts: 290
Gixxer wrote:
Cooler wrote:
Yes, I agree that is natural to pull into L1 of a motorway when this lane is clear and can facilitate the cruising speed of your choice.


Cooler wrote:
Another time we were driving on an empty motorway at night, again at 70mph in the middle lane,


Bit of a contradiction do you not think?

I also notice that you choose to only answer specific questions that the group ask.....now who else do we know who used to do that? :roll:

As for you being a member of the IAM, I only have one thing to say to you.... kush in toches arein!


Gixxer,

On a completely empty motorway, travelling at night and at speed, L2 is a comfortable place to be, and does no harm. This is all about driving according to the prevailing conditions and anticipating hazards. Admittedly I didn't anticipate the Bmer, who came up so quickly he must have been speed testing.

Re answering questions, what have I avoided answering?

Re IAM, it was rather a long time ago. I passed the test when I was a police driver back in the 1970s. Although many of the lessons learned are still with me. I naturally drive in the holdback position, with a silent commentary on raod conditions and anticipated hazards. Second nature I guess.

C.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 19:26 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 14:06
Posts: 3654
Location: Oxfordshire
Cooler wrote:
RobinXe wrote:
Whats all this bollocks about ecological and economical? Keep left unless overtaking. Stopping at red lights is also uneconomical, but no more optional than the above!


Robin,

There are no red lights on a motorway, which makes motorway driving more economical than A road driving, provided that we maintain a steady speed (not too fast because of wind resistance) with a minimum of braking a light touch on the throttle. Braking always costs us in fuel unless we have one of these new hybrids.

C.


Fallacious, the point is not the lights, and where they may be sited, but the fact that keep left unless overtaking and stopping at red lights are both rules of the road, neither of which are optional based on your fuel consumption concerns.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 19:26 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2004 11:05
Posts: 1044
Location: Hillingdon
Cooler wrote:
I did mention an occasion when I was driving at night on a completely empty motorway and chose to occupy the middle lane. I was suprised by the sudden appearance of a Bmer travelling far in excess of the legal limit who cut in front of us and then forced my speed down by braking.


Cooler wrote:
Driving is about road observation and and anticipation of traffic on the road ahead, it is not about knee jerk reactions to aggressive drivers coming from behind.


I'd be tempted to delete the "ahead" from the first part of that comment, because driving is definitely not just about staring out of the windscreen at the road ahead - knowing what's going on behind you is just as important. And perhaps if you paid just a little more attention to what was going on behind you, you wouldn't find yourself being surprised by fast movers?

_________________
Chris


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 19:34 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 16:52
Posts: 290
Gixxer wrote:
Cooler wrote:
Gixxer,

I did mention an occasion when I was driving at night on a completely empty motorway and chose to occupy the middle lane. I was suprised by the sudden appearance of a Bmer travelling far in excess of the legal limit who cut in front of us and then forced my speed down by braking.

First rule of driving.....expect the unexpected!

Cooler wrote:
Driving is about road observation and and anticipation of traffic on the road ahead,

Skills that you obviously lack judging by your comments thus far.

Cooler wrote:
I have wondered whether these flashers are unstable types, and your characterisation of 'nutter' may not be far from the truth. You are suggesting that there are motorists who not only wish to break the law by speeding, trying to force people out of their way, but would resort to common assault on another driver.

What planet are you living on exactly?


Gixxer,

Yes, good point about the unexpected. I have seen some crazy things on the roads, and they happen very quickly. A measured (but not over cautious) driving style is advisable.

Your comment about 'nutters' on the road was well made. I think that road rage is an increasingly common thing these days, and I am sure you will agree with me that anger behind the wheel is indefensible and should be treated to the full force of the law.

It is one thing for a motorist to eat a chocolate bar while driving, but it is another for them to wave both hands in obscene gesturing at another driver while travelling at 70mph on a busy motorway. Safer to keep your hands on the wheel.

C.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 19:37 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 09:01
Posts: 1548
Cooler wrote:
Re IAM, it was rather a long time ago. I passed the test when I was a police driver back in the 1970s.

I find it incredibly hard to believe that you were a police driver based on the comments you have made thus far in this thread, but there is an easy way to prove whether you are telling the truth or simply trolling.........

PM me your collar number, surname, and the dates (years will do) you were in active service.....I'll soon find out whether you were really old bill or not.

_________________
What makes you think I'm drunk officer, have I got a fat bird with me?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 19:40 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 16:52
Posts: 290
RobinXe wrote:
Cooler wrote:
RobinXe wrote:
Whats all this bollocks about ecological and economical? Keep left unless overtaking. Stopping at red lights is also uneconomical, but no more optional than the above!


Robin,

There are no red lights on a motorway, which makes motorway driving more economical than A road driving, provided that we maintain a steady speed (not too fast because of wind resistance) with a minimum of braking a light touch on the throttle. Braking always costs us in fuel unless we have one of these new hybrids.

C.


Fallacious, the point is not the lights, and where they may be sited, but the fact that keep left unless overtaking and stopping at red lights are both rules of the road, neither of which are optional based on your fuel consumption concerns.


Robin,

This is not strictly correct. I use a motorway most days and vehicles do not 'keep left unless overtaking'. Vehicles use all the lanes of the motorway, mostly lorries in L1, with faster traffic in L2 and L3.

I just don't see most or even many drivers dodging in and out of L1. This is not an opinion, but an observation of fact.

C.

PS - Admittedly, the motorway I use is pretty busy. Of course it is different when traffic is quieter and L1 is emptier. The pressure of traffic does change the dynamic.


Last edited by Cooler on Fri Mar 14, 2008 20:02, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 19:50 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 16:52
Posts: 290
Twister wrote:
I'd be tempted to delete the "ahead" from the first part of that comment, because driving is definitely not just about staring out of the windscreen at the road ahead - knowing what's going on behind you is just as important. And perhaps if you paid just a little more attention to what was going on behind you, you wouldn't find yourself being surprised by fast movers?


Twister,

That is by far the wisest comment I've read so far. You are quite right that I misspoke with the word 'ahead'. Of course the rear view mirror is the third eye.

To be honest, I can't remember the exact details of the event I described, but I remember being surprised when the Bmer swerved in front of us. I probably had him in the mirror, but nothing untoward.

C.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 20:04 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 09:01
Posts: 1548
@ Mods,

The guy (or girl) is a troll....sort it out please.

_________________
What makes you think I'm drunk officer, have I got a fat bird with me?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 20:10 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 08:22
Posts: 2618
Cooler wrote:
To be honest, I can't remember the exact details of the event I described, but I remember being surprised when the Bmer swerved in front of us. I probably had him in the mirror, but nothing untoward.

C.


Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear.

_________________
Science won over religion when they started installing lightning rods on churches.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 20:14 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 16:52
Posts: 290
Gixxer wrote:
@ Mods,

The guy (or girl) is a troll....sort it out please.


Folks,

I have posted on this forum in good faith. On this particular thread my views are not in the majority and a lively debate has ensued. However, I have held my ground and expressed my opinion as well as I can.

It is not a bad thing to have a debate over a contentious issue, indeed forums benefit from lively exchanges, provided that there are no ad hominems or other breaches of forum rules.

C.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 20:16 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 16:52
Posts: 290
Sixy_the_red wrote:
Cooler wrote:
To be honest, I can't remember the exact details of the event I described, but I remember being surprised when the Bmer swerved in front of us. I probably had him in the mirror, but nothing untoward.

C.


Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear.


Sixy,

I know. It was my wife who was most worried. A completely empty motorway and this car slowing right down in front of us! She said it was like being in a film, and not one you would want to be in.

C.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 21:14 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
Gixxer wrote:
@ Mods,

The guy (or girl) is a troll....sort it out please.

Speaking as a member of the admin team I don't see any evidence that s/he is a troll. Merely expressing an opinion that is at variance with those of many people here doesn't automatically make someone a troll.

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 21:36 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 09:01
Posts: 1548
PeterE wrote:
Merely expressing an opinion that is at variance with those of many people here doesn't automatically make someone a troll.

Peter,

The guy has contradicted himself several times throughout the course of the thread, makes claims to being an ex police driver as well as being IAM qualified, doesn't seem to comprehend the concept of keep left unless overtaking, ignores questions that he could never have an answer for, etc.

Whatever mate, I certainly can't be bothered with him any more.

_________________
What makes you think I'm drunk officer, have I got a fat bird with me?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 23:05 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 16:52
Posts: 290
Gixxer wrote:
PeterE wrote:
Merely expressing an opinion that is at variance with those of many people here doesn't automatically make someone a troll.

Peter,

The guy has contradicted himself several times throughout the course of the thread, makes claims to being an ex police driver as well as being IAM qualified, doesn't seem to comprehend the concept of keep left unless overtaking, ignores questions that he could never have an answer for, etc.

Whatever mate, I certainly can't be bothered with him any more.


Gixxer and folks,

This debate is not about personalities. Maybe I was in error to use examples from my own experience to investigate a general point. I was indeed a police driver as a young man, but that is 40 years ago, so it is hardly relevant here and it was probably unhelpful to mention it. Also, my humorous approach to a serious issue may have misled some people.

However, there have been some very interesting views put forward re this thread. Yes, normally we are expected to return to L1 of a motorway when not overtaking. Of course many drivers do not do this, and there we have the point of contention. I have tried to explore why drivers do not always return promptly to L1 and why I am sometimes reluctant to do so.

I live quite close to a motorway bridge, so I intend to cycle over there next week and carefully observe the traffic flow. My guess is that I will see a good number of drivers travelling in the middle lane, but maybe I'm wrong? I know it's a bit anorakish.

C.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 15, 2008 02:19 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 16:51
Posts: 1323
Location: Stafford - a short distance past hope
PeterE wrote:
Gixxer wrote:
@ Mods,

The guy (or girl) is a troll....sort it out please.

Speaking as a member of the admin team I don't see any evidence that s/he is a troll. Merely expressing an opinion that is at variance with those of many people here doesn't automatically make someone a troll.


I agree (as a Mod) - not a troll and entitled to his view

_________________
I won't slave for beggar's pay,
likewise gold and jewels,
but I would slave to learn the way
to sink your ship of fools


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 15, 2008 04:27 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 14:06
Posts: 3654
Location: Oxfordshire
Cooler wrote:
RobinXe wrote:
Cooler wrote:
RobinXe wrote:
Whats all this bollocks about ecological and economical? Keep left unless overtaking. Stopping at red lights is also uneconomical, but no more optional than the above!


Robin,

There are no red lights on a motorway, which makes motorway driving more economical than A road driving, provided that we maintain a steady speed (not too fast because of wind resistance) with a minimum of braking a light touch on the throttle. Braking always costs us in fuel unless we have one of these new hybrids.

C.


Fallacious, the point is not the lights, and where they may be sited, but the fact that keep left unless overtaking and stopping at red lights are both rules of the road, neither of which are optional based on your fuel consumption concerns.


Robin,

This is not strictly correct. I use a motorway most days and vehicles do not 'keep left unless overtaking'. Vehicles use all the lanes of the motorway, mostly lorries in L1, with faster traffic in L2 and L3.

I just don't see most or even many drivers dodging in and out of L1. This is not an opinion, but an observation of fact.

C.

PS - Admittedly, the motorway I use is pretty busy. Of course it is different when traffic is quieter and L1 is emptier. The pressure of traffic does change the dynamic.


Actually, it is strictly correct. Many don't, but they have no valid reason not to. Are you as poor a driver as they, "police qualifications" and all?

The majority of people once believed the earth was flat. Does that make them correct, or vindicate the luddite who agrees with them?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 15, 2008 07:27 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 16:34
Posts: 11
cooler, you mentioned your third eye, that is not your mirror but where you are speaking from :lol:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 15, 2008 08:42 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
scrag wrote:
cooler, you mentioned your third eye, that is not your mirror but where you are speaking from :lol:

Also, speaking as an admin, we could do without abusive comments like that which are in breach of the forum rules.

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 15, 2008 09:46 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 16:52
Posts: 290
RobinXe wrote:
Cooler wrote:
RobinXe wrote:
Cooler wrote:
RobinXe wrote:
Whats all this bollocks about ecological and economical? Keep left unless overtaking. Stopping at red lights is also uneconomical, but no more optional than the above!


Robin,

There are no red lights on a motorway, which makes motorway driving more economical than A road driving, provided that we maintain a steady speed (not too fast because of wind resistance) with a minimum of braking a light touch on the throttle. Braking always costs us in fuel unless we have one of these new hybrids.

C.

l
Fallacious, the point is not the lights, and where they may be sited, but the fact that keep left unless overtaking and stopping at red lights are both rules of the road, neither of which are optional based on your fuel consumption concerns.


Robin,

This is not strictly correct. I use a motorway most days and vehicles do not 'keep left unless overtaking'. Vehicles use all the lanes of the motorway, mostly lorries in L1, with faster traffic in L2 and L3.

I just don't see most or even many drivers dodging in and out of L1. This is not an opinion, but an observation of fact.

C.

PS - Admittedly, the motorway I use is pretty busy. Of course it is different when traffic is quieter and L1 is emptier. The pressure of traffic does change the dynamic.


Actually, it is strictly correct. Many don't, but they have no valid reason not to. Are you as poor a driver as they, "police qualifications" and all?

The majority of people once believed the earth was flat. Does that make them correct, or vindicate the luddite who agrees with them?


Robin,

Yes, I agree that rules of the road, as published in the highway code, are not optional. My point is that many people do not follow certain rules to the letter and this includes lingering in the middle lane and it includes motorway speeding.

In my original question I was quite interested to see whether posters saw 'middle lane hogging' or speeding as most condonable and I have used examples to reveal poster's attitudes.

From the answers so far it looks like speeding might be the lesser evil in some people's views. For, logically, we would have to condone speeding in order to expect a driver travelling at 70mph in the middle lane of a motorway to get out of our way.

This has been a most interesting discussion, if a little emotive.

Maybe we should ask the following straight question. Which is the least serious motorway driving offence?

a. Middle lane hogging at the legal speed limit.

b. Speeding.

C.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 15, 2008 12:42 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 20:28
Posts: 1267
Location: not too far in front, not too far behind.
Cooler,

are you seriously trying to argue that two wrongs make a right? You seem to now accept that driving in lane 2 is a bad thing, and have always implied that you see speeding as a bad thing too.

There is duplicity on the part of the Safespeed chorus who happily refer to the "rules of the road" when it comes to driving in lane 2 but disregarding them when it comes to complying with the speed limit, but this is nothing new here, so if that's the angle you are pitching at, it's not really breaking news.

_________________
COAST Not just somewhere to keep a beach.

A young loner on a crusade to champion the cause of the innocent, the helpless, the powerless, in a world of criminals who operate above the law.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 464 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 24  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.016s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]