Rigpig wrote:
Ziltro wrote:
It's not just a sticker. It's criminal damage and an invalid allegation.
No, it
isn't criminal damage and I've pointed you to a reference which states as much, sheesh how many more times?
Got that? It isn't criminal damage Ziltro, and I'd wager my mortgage on the fact if CAMS has the bottle to follow such a claim through into court and he/she wins on those grounds.
But now, thanks to the advice and suggestions you offered safe in the knowledge that it wasn't you who was going to have to follow them through, the OP has now made themselves look like a complete idiot in front of the receptionist who, I'll also wager, no more takes the allegations seriously as I have a chance of winning Wimbledon this year.
In fact, here's a challenge for you Ziltro, put your money where your half-baked ideas are. Offer to fund the OP's claim of libel and criminal damage through a court

Your Norfolk definition mentioned not criminal damage if no cost is incurred.
In this case, it is unlikely that anyone would have the means to remove the sticker with them in the car, and it would be unwise to drive with the sticker in place.
I would suggest that because of this, then criminal damage would be unlikely to stick (no pun intended!) but if you called the police, they might be minded to force the college to remove it, or be charged with criminal damage.
I used to work in a hotel which clamped cars which were not belonging to residents of the hotel, and an A4 sticker was stuck on the screen in front of the driver, so as to prevent them from driving off without realising they were wearing a Denver Boot - the difference was the Avery sticker could be peeled off in one piece if warm, and tackled with care.
The Hotel company solicitors advised on the wording of the warning notices, the stickers and the circumstances in which they were to be used.
The release fee was £20 - of which half went to charity. Drivers rarely complained, as they usually knew they should not have been there.
I did once clamp a car whose driver had given a false registration number when he checked in - but then the lady he claimed was his wife wasn't either!!