nicycle wrote:
Reminds me of the few times in traffic calmed areas I've had to overtake cars while cycling. Not a nice thing to have to do in the least.
The principle is right though. A huge chuck of london, Metroland, was built around the metropolitan railway, now the metropolitan line. At first the stops served the country site but after a few decades houses were built up. The stops are quite a bit further apart than 400m to offer a faster services, and there are fast and slow trains, in fact 6 tracks on one stretch. I see no reason why this can't be repeated in the 21st century.
Quote:
Some abhorred Metro-land for its predictability and sameness. A. N. Wilson observed that, although semi-detached dwellings of the kind built in the inner Metro-land suburbs in the 1930s "aped larger houses, the stockbroker Tudorbethan of Edwardian Surrey and Middlesex", they were in fact "pokey". He reflected that
as [the husband] went off to the nearest station every morning ... the wife, half liberated and half slave, stayed behind wondering how many of the newly invented domestic appliances they could afford to purchase, and how long the man would hold on to his job in the Slump. No wonder, when war came, that so many of these suburban prisoners felt a sense of release .
Valerie Grove, who conceded that Metro-land was "a kinder word than 'suburbia'" and referred to the less spoilt areas beyond Rickmansworth as "Outer Metro-land", maintained that "suburbia had no visible history. Anyone with any spirit … had to get out of Metro-land to make their mark" .
21st century high-rise ghetto repeat ?
Or just another way of keeping people in their place ?