mpaton2004 wrote:
Pretty much confirms what I thought - you are an angry person. I do hope you don't let your anger take the better of you when you're behind the wheel.
So just because I get annoyed at someone who's been trolling and deliberately misrepresenting people for goodness knows how long, and is only here to push an extremist anti-car agenda by disrupting us rather than debating fairly, I'm an "angry person". Never mind the fact that it took me many hundreds of posts to tell weepej what I really thought of him. Never mind the fact that I explained how I'm not angry on the road and have never done the things you suggest, you just repeat it anyway, because all you're interested in is hurling infantile, unsubstantiated insults at people and then repeating them again and again. If we're generalising on the strength of single posts, I could call you an awful lot of things. Talking of which, you haven't denied that you're self-righteous (either on or off the roads), probably because that would be too ridiculous a thing to say, even for you.
mpaton2004 wrote:
I think that last post is a candidate for ad-hominem if there ever was one! You should be banned under rule 11! However, you probably won't be, as you're a camera hater who contributes to the organisation. Hypocrisy, anyone?
Ah, another self-appointed policeman who's actually just a troll. Because I think that today (if not before), you've finally completed your metamorphosis into a bridge-dweller. Congratulations.
Besides, you should be banned for both using the same account. But I don't really care if you are or not, because as of now I can't see your posts anymore. Bliss. It really is the best forum feature ever. (Why do you keep using mpaton2004's account, and why do you apparently insist on controlling every aspect of his life? You're so annoyed that he dared to join SS against your wishes that you force him to leave, make him pretend to have changed his mind on cameras, and then come on here and start irritating the regulars. Are you bitter that you don't have any real power or something? Presumably that's the reason why you support cameras and stupid speed limits as well: you're just a sad, pathetic control freak. I think the "angry person" is the one who becomes enraged just because they don't have control over everything and everyone. The one who runs around screeching at the very thought of people being treated like adults and left to make decisions on things like their speed themselves. God I despise people like you, and the misery that you cause in society.)
And don't forget to drive at a maximum of 10mph everywhere from now on, because otherwise, according to your post earlier on this thread, you'd be "taking risks for the sake of mobility", in other words risking the lives of poor innocent children (who are quite entitled to run into the road whenever they want) just so that you can get to your destination a few minutes quicker. And you wouldn't want to be seen as any more of a hypocrite than you are already.
(and that's without me having seen you)
_________________
Paul Smith: a legend.
"The freedom provided by the motor vehicle is not universally applauded, however: there are those who resent the loss of state control over individual choice that the car represents. Such people rarely admit their prejudices openly; instead, they make false or exaggerated claims about the adverse effects of road transport in order to justify calls for higher taxation or restrictions on mobility." (
Conservative Way Forward:
Stop The War Against Drivers)
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
Members
I do keep to law .. I have trained to drive at mouthj watering speeds asn we train our responses to be able to contend with anything thrown at them 