M3RBMW wrote:
So for the average punter, without a GPS system to confirm their speed, the idea is to drive well below the limit just in case the speedo is out.
If you have no reason to doubt your speedo is accurate and you are pinged for speeding because of it whose fault is it? There should always be a reasonable margin allowed as the speed limit was always intended as a guide to an appropriate speed and has only recently become an absolute maximum.
In Victoria, Australia, we get booked for driving over the limit by 2-3mph so you can see just how unfair that is.
I have a little pocket GPS which I use for sailing, walking, driving etc and which I sometimes put on the dash.
My previous car, which was a Vauxhall Omega, had a speedo which was absolutely spot on. My current car (Volvo S60) has a speedo which is 7-10% fast across the range.
I wasn't particularly impressed with that, so I wrote to Volvo asking if there was any way to calibrate the thing properly. They replied that speedometers in new cars can read up to 15% fast but they must never ever read slow, so theirs are set at +7% to allow for manufacturing and tyre tolerances. You might get a good one or you might get an awful one. I guess mine is averagely awful and when I drive I compensate for the speedo error.
But last year I was on holiday Down Under (with my GPS) and drove several hire cars, all Holden Commodores, and they were all spot-on! If a mass market manufacturer like GM can get it right, why can't an aspiring premium brand like Volvo? Grrr.