Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Thu Oct 29, 2026 01:35

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2005 21:42 
Offline
Suspended
Suspended

Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2004 13:41
Posts: 539
Location: Herts
As if we have not already got enough problems with conjestion, it looks as if they are now going ahead with fitting limiters to everything over 3.5 tons.

This is madness :twisted:

_________________
Steve


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 11, 2005 19:59 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 13:41
Posts: 514
Location: Thames Valley
Great - and we can look forward to them clogging up lane 3 on 4-lane motorways. :wink:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 11, 2005 21:53 
Offline
Suspended
Suspended

Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2004 13:41
Posts: 539
Location: Herts
DieselMoment wrote:
Great - and we can look forward to them clogging up lane 3 on 4-lane motorways. :wink:


Yep..bring all m/way speed limits to 56mph, but hey, no one will be able to get a speeding ticket.

in a way the Government have kicked themselves in the teeth :!:

_________________
Steve


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 11, 2005 23:32 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 22:21
Posts: 57
bmwk12 wrote:
(...)
..., it looks as if they are now going ahead with fitting limiters to everything over 3.5 tons.

This is madness :twisted:


I thought limiters to 56MPH (90km/hr) were already installed in all trucks above 3.5tons all over in Europe, since the mid 90's. But not in the UK then?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 11, 2005 23:50 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member

Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 13:50
Posts: 2643
bmwk12 wrote:
As if we have not already got enough problems with conjestion, it looks as if they are now going ahead with fitting limiters to everything over 3.5 tons.


...except trains, of course :roll: :roll: :roll:

Regards
Peter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 01:13 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member

Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2004 20:56
Posts: 59
Location: Alnwick, Northumberland
Quote:
I thought limiters to 56MPH (90km/hr) were already installed in all trucks above 3.5tons all over in Europe, since the mid 90's. But not in the UK then?


Not all trucks over 3.5T are governed to 56mph Peter.

I drive an HGV and we are stuck to 56mph, however, the 7.5T have a different threshold. I know it use to be 70mph, but not being involved with them it may changed. One thing I do know however, 56mph, it ain't :D


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 10:23 
Offline
Police Officer and Member
Police Officer and Member

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 22:53
Posts: 565
Location: Kendal
Littlegoozle wrote:
Quote:
I thought limiters to 56MPH (90km/hr) were already installed in all trucks above 3.5tons all over in Europe, since the mid 90's. But not in the UK then?


Not all trucks over 3.5T are governed to 56mph Peter.

I drive an HGV and we are stuck to 56mph, however, the 7.5T have a different threshold. I know it use to be 70mph, but not being involved with them it may changed. One thing I do know however, 56mph, it ain't :D


Until now the 7.5t-12t goods vehicle has, since 1994 (you were right Paul :oops: ) been restricted to 60mph, the 12t+ goods vehicles to 56mph. This will be extended across the board to 56mph for all over 3.5t, and retrospective fits to vehicles first used on or after 2001. (goods vehicles <7.5t used only nationally will not need to be limited until 2008).
Coaches and minibuses also have similar restrictions.

As far as I'm aware, There have been no legally required limiters on goods vehicles below 7.5t until now, and they have always been allowed to travel up to 70mph on motorways.

VOSA has good info on these changes with PDFs covering the detail.


It's a bad move. It takes the thought out of driving. I'd much rather have active speed limit compliance. (Within the tolerances of course :wink: )

_________________
Fixed ideas are like cramp, for instance in the foot, yet the best remedy is to step on them.

Ian


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 10:28 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
IanH wrote:
It's a bad move. It takes the thought out of driving. I'd much rather have active speed limit compliance. (Within the tolerances of course :wink: )

It's worth mentioning that the much-maligned UK government in fact opposed this change but were outvoted by other EU countries.

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 14:21 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 22:34
Posts: 603
Location: West Scotland
Pete317 Wrote:

...except trains, of course

A station I passed through the other day (very busy and in a built up area) in London had a sign just at the start of the station saying HST-80MPH i.e. High speed trains are allowed to do 80MPH through a station in an urban area :roll:

Regards

Andrew

_________________
It's a scam........or possibly a scamola


Homer Simpson


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 15:54 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member

Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 13:50
Posts: 2643
andys280176 wrote:
A station I passed through the other day (very busy and in a built up area) in London had a sign just at the start of the station saying HST-80MPH i.e. High speed trains are allowed to do 80MPH through a station in an urban area :roll:


Yet the 'reason' they give for 50mph limits at motorway 'roadworks' is that cars passing at greater speeds can 'suck' workers onto the roadway.
But they allow high-speed trains to thunder through stations at 80mph, past platforms filled with people. :roll: :roll: :roll:

Don't get me wrong, I'm not anti-trains - just anti-double standards and hypocricy.

Regards
Peter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 19:34 
Offline
Suspended
Suspended

Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2004 13:41
Posts: 539
Location: Herts
Quote:
As far as I'm aware, There have been no legally required limiters on goods vehicles below 7.5t until now, and they have always been allowed to travel up to 70mph on motorways.


They have never had a limiter, which makes all the differance. As we get the same situaction with LGV's, minimal speed differance, with everything over 3.5 ton, goods vehicles.

Not sure that it effects coaches, as they do not come under the goods vehicle rules.

Never been able to understand that one, why are coaches not restricted the same as LGV?

They are running high weights and are full of passengers :?

_________________
Steve


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 19:36 
Offline
Suspended
Suspended

Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2004 13:41
Posts: 539
Location: Herts
Quote:
It's worth mentioning that the much-maligned UK government in fact opposed this change but were outvoted by other EU countries.


However, as always, it will only be the UK, that carries out the stringent enforcement.

_________________
Steve


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 19:38 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
bmwk12 wrote:
Not sure that it effects coaches, as they do not come under the goods vehicle rules.

Never been able to understand that one, why are coaches not restricted the same as LGV?

They are running high weights and are full of passengers :?

Coaches now have to have limiters set at 100 km/h (62.5 mph). On most people's speedos this registers in the 66-70 mph area so it's not so obvious that they are limited.

The regulations that bring in 90 km/h limiters for goods vehicles over 3.5 tonnes will also bring in 100 km/h limiters for all vehicles capable of carrying more than 8 passengers.

Amazing when you think that, soon after the M1 opened in 1959, Midland Red coaches were regularly (and legally) running up and down it at 80 mph.

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 19:44 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
bmwk12 wrote:
Never been able to understand that one, why are coaches not restricted the same as LGV?


55*80kg = 4.4 tonnes.

And of course the load doesn't tend to move (or slosh) around.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 19:54 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
SafeSpeed wrote:
bmwk12 wrote:
Never been able to understand that one, why are coaches not restricted the same as LGV?

55*80kg = 4.4 tonnes.

And of course the load doesn't tend to move (or slosh) around.

Depends how much food and drink has been consumed before boarding :wink:

It's a crumb of comfort from all this that coaches aren't limited to the same speed as lorries :?

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 20:32 
Offline
Suspended
Suspended

Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2004 13:41
Posts: 539
Location: Herts
Quote:
55*80kg = 4.4 tonnes.



Care to elaborate on that one :?:

_________________
Steve


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 20:33 
Offline
Suspended
Suspended

Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2004 13:41
Posts: 539
Location: Herts
Did you forget the 9 tonne chassis?

_________________
Steve


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 23:12 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 22:21
Posts: 57
PeterE wrote:
(...)
It's worth mentioning that the much-maligned UK government in fact opposed this change but were outvoted by other EU countries.


Yes, I read that in one or other EU-report. The UK government was opposed because they feared serious problems with local congestion on motorways caused by trucks overtaking at speed differences of less than 1 MPH (and right they were). But I thought it came to a EU legislation anyway. I am quite surprised to learn the UK did not join after all.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.021s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]