Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Fri Nov 14, 2025 13:12

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 08:00 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 23:28
Posts: 1940
I decide to post in this section instead of "News"



I decided not to title it per the Manchester's rather lurid headline.. :rolleyes:




Manchester Evening News wrote:
Convoy of cops chased grandad
Exclusive Neal Keeling
7/ 8/2008

EIGHT police officers have been suspended from driving duties after a grandad biker died following a 50-minute chase involving several squad cars and the force plane.

It emerged today that all officers wanted to do was check his documents.

Alan Long, 54, was the 25th person killed in six years on Greater Manchester roads in incidents involving GMP vehicles - one of the worst records in the country.[b]

The M.E.N. can reveal today that the [b]police control room tried to call off the chase a number of times, but the pursuit went on.


Officers had signalled for Mr Long to pull over because of a driving document offence. He failed to stop and was chased for more than 50 minutes, with a number of vehicles joining the pursuit. The force plane was also scrambled.

Senior officers within GMP are understood to be furious and an investigation has been launched by the Independent Police Complaints Commission.

One senior source said: "There is concern within GMP as to whether the correct procedures were followed. :?

Convoy

"At one stage, apparently, a convoy of police vehicles was involved in the pursuit."

The chase began in Denton and Mr Long drove on and off the M60 until he was involved in a crash with a car in Stalybridge. He was taken to Tameside General after the Friday crash and died on Saturday.

The father-of-five, from Denton, had 13 grandchildren and was described as a `passionate biker'. His wife Julie said he `lived life to the full'. :scratchchin:

Assistant Chief Constable Ian Hopkins said: "GMP can confirm that eight police officers have had their driving authority withdrawn."

At leastone of the police vehicles was an unmarked car from the Traffic Vehicle Crime Unit.

The IPCC probe will look at how many vehicles were involved and whether they followed correct procedure. They must also establish why police first wanted Mr Long to stop.

The IPCC published a study on police accidents last year and chairman Nick Hardwick said they believed bike pursuits `can be particularly dangerous as the rider is much more vulnerable' than a car driver.

He added: "We recommend these pursuits should be limited to instances where serious crime has been committed."



Unfortunately, by suggesting that bikers should not be pursued because they are more "vulnerable" could lead to their thinking like this grandfather that they may not be pursued...

Of course, the biker should have stopped when signalled to. They behaviour could have caused suspicion that "more to it.. " :rolleyes:

But that aside.. control tried to calll off this pursuit .. yet the officers chose to continue?


Manchester's Leader column consider the story raises

MEN leader wrote:
profoundly disturbing questions


The leader commenter think the pursuit was "disproportionate"...

But I do also wonder which document "was out of order" given the biker fled the way he did. :scratchchin:

But in any case... surely they could have called off the chase .. und just picked him up from home .. assuming he was the registered keeper of this bike.. Or given he was local .. just picked up another day when he "less of aware of the stealthmobile" ... :rolleyes:

A sad story for all involved. It seems OTT for so many to be involved.

But the in-laws have noticed cams over M602 at the Eccles/Trafford Centre exit... 8 traffic cars parked up on hard shoulder further along .. a week or so ago..

They also noticed similar activity this last week elsewhere. Perhaps this was ANPR activity at its source? :scratchchin:

MEN story last week wrote:
GMP are actively targetting any vehicle without insurance etc.. :scratchchin:

_________________
Nicht ganz im Lot!
Ich setze mich immer wieder in die Nesseln! Der Mad Doc ist mein Mann! Und ich benutzte seinen PC!

UND OUR SMILEYS? Smile ... und the the world smiles with you.
Smiley guy seen when you read
Fine me for Safe Speed
(& other good causes..)

Greatest love & Greatest Achievements Require Greatest Risk
But if you lose the driving plan - don't lose the COAST lesson.
Me?
Je ne regrette rien
!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 11:04 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 14:06
Posts: 3654
Location: Oxfordshire
Not only are bikers more vulnerable, they are also extremely unlikely to be stopped by police cars in a safe manner. Even a modestly engined bike is capable of out-accelerating/outrunning even the most powerful cars in use by the police and, even if they do keep up with him, their conventional techniques for stopping non-compliant vehicles, such as "stinger" or a rolling roadblock, are not safe for use on a bike. Its reported that an air support unit was involved, so why didn't they maintain surveillance whilst the cars dropped back, thus 'allowing' the pursued to ride in a less frantic manner? Sooner or later he's gonna need to stop for gas, and then they can pounce, safely! Quite clearly a longer, safe, pursuit is preferable to a short dangerous one that ends in tragedy.

There were so many other ways this could have been undertaken, with so much less chance of a KSI, that I feel the GMP's actions on the day are tantamount to manslaughter. This is even before we ask the question whether an 8-car U.S. style convoy-chase was a proportionate response to whatever transgression the biker was alleged to have committed (and remember that innocent people have had their cars crushed based on the failings of the ANPR database).

_________________
Regulation without education merely creates more criminals.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 16:58 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
No insurance.
I have only managed to tax my bike online once, the other times it has shown as no insurance.
I'm getting (following recent problems with my van showing no-insurance) fed-up with the inability of the police to understand that not *showing* as insured does not mean *it is not insured*.
I'm also fed-up with the implication that the insurance certificate I carry with me must be invalid and I must be a crook.

_________________
The world runs on oil, period. No other substance can compete when it comes to energy density, flexibility, ease of handling, ease of transportation. If oil didn’t exist we would have to invent it.”

56 years after it was decided it was needed, the Bedford Bypass is nearing completion. The last single carriageway length of it.We have the most photogenic mayor though, always being photographed doing nothing


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 09, 2008 00:52 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2008 15:50
Posts: 249
Having had personal experience of intimidation by police car up my ass at half past midnight on rural roads I couldnt say what went through the minds of these cops but I can speculate what went through the minds of some. What the cops did to me, had it been done to a less capable rider or novice they would have caused a crash. Without detail the cops in my incident were 100% wrong and up to now have got away with it but that another issue.The point is do not underestimate the over zelous nature of some cops, and do not accept that all traffic cops are expertly trained drivers, because few are at that level and none of their training takes into account their mentality.

In this case it seems ott and resulted in someones death. Cops are always on TV telling us all how they want to save lives and indeed some do as do some policing policies, but I find it stupid that bikes are chased to this end. If they didnt chase him, would he be dead? ....What was he guilty of that justified such a chase? Cops get things wrong but they are often a very long time admitting it, if they ever do!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 09, 2008 23:41 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 23:42
Posts: 3820
We've halted many a pursuit .. even though the idiot biker was well in excess of the ton. We reckon we'll get him some other time soon enough..


Unfortunately, as I mentioned in a different thread tonight.. we have had some who ploughed into a rather nasty oak tree at twice the ton .. on a lethal bend... :roll:

No.. we do not use any evidence in a PR nonsense to the media. We may ask the bereaved if we can use some shock photos to deter young "red bloods" from similar outcome .. without any PR nonsense... trying to score points over whoever or whatetever :roll: We always abide by their wishes so who was to blame for what ... as this is another matter of respect.. and mutual respect will always beget mutual respect :) ..

I cannot go on anything other than Wildy's paste up from the MEN site here.

I suspect he had let the insurance lapse. Maybe it was not a week's oversight. :roll: Maybe the bike required an MOT or something put right under a HORT 1 etc ./. which he failed to comply with :roll:

How much of this spilled into red mist on both sides .. I really cannot say. :roll: :bunker:

I suspect the biker may have kept on "goading" and trying to re-kindle the pursuit after the call -off. :roll: We do get this type too. If this occurs . it is a difficult call regardless as he may still have the fatal without any action .. and if he does and the police were even nearby.. it gets the full "media twister" :roll; whichever side of the coin Wildy's "Kismet" chooses to call

:roll:

The truth will out in due course. My thoughts are with the officers who got caught up in this affair. I also have some compassion for the biker's family. They are also in mourning and it does not matter to them if he failed to renew a policy or an MOT or whatever and tried to evade justice and a fine. :roll: All they see, alas, is that their nearest and dearest died .. and the police were somehow involved :roll: Look.. they will be feeling a mix of anger against the police.. anger against the biker ... guilt if they knew he was taking some chances with his bike .. and then guilt at being angry too.

GMP will be as adept as we are at compassionate liaison... but when all is said and done.. he died when he collided with another vehicle when all that was required of him was a document check. We are aware that the database may not be up to date .

We do allow 7 days to produce all documents for most here.

. But even so .. this should not cause a grandfather to ride off and refuse to pull over at such great speed like that. It will create suspicion that there is more to this than a failure to renew VED/Insurance?MOT :roll:

The truth will come out eventually .. but so who caused what to happen ..those officers will still live with the "what if they had done X instead of Y" and the biker's family will be asking the same angry questions of their loved one's behaviour in all this.. :roll:


Indeed a sad affair .. I cannot vouch for all police officers. I can only say that our mob are not "out to get folk" and we accord polite respect even when dealing with a known criminal. To do otherwise can sink any
prosecution .. and a professional person is supposed to stay calm and collected anyway.. :popcorn:

_________________
Take with a chuckle or a grain of salt
Drive without COAST and it's all your own fault!

A SMILE is a curve that sets everything straight (P Diller).

A Smiley Per post
FINES USfor our COAST!


Approach love and cooking with reckless abandon - but driving with a smile and a COAST calm mind.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 00:05 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 21:10
Posts: 1693
ISTR a study from the states back in the 70's that found that a significant number of completly innocent people will run simply because they are being chased! these are people who, even in their own minds, have not done anything wrong!

(Like in excess of 30%!)

Police chases should only be carried out if they are attempting to apprehend people who are a known and significant real risk to other people.

Hounding people to their deaths because their paperwork is not in order is not acceptable!

_________________
"The road to a police state is paved with public safety legislation"


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 07:31 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 09:01
Posts: 1548
Herbie J wrote:
and do not accept that all traffic cops are expertly trained drivers, because few are at that level and none of their training takes into account their mentality.

Tell me about it, I watched Police Stop 2 last night and there was one chase (in the pi$$ing rain) where the lead pursuit car was taking incredible risks to apprehend the offender including overtakes where he was missing oncoming traffic with literally inches to spare.
Before anybody says "it all looks different on camera from inside the car", the lead car was being followed by the camera car.

Now I accept that the offender has to be stopped, but at what cost to the public?

In last nights episode, they were only chasing a disqualified driver.
Now if the guy was wanted for (say) murder, then I would understand why they may be reluctant to call the chase off....but to take the risks they did just to catch someone who decided to ignore the courts was way OTT (especially as they knew who he was and could have nicked him later at home).

_________________
What makes you think I'm drunk officer, have I got a fat bird with me?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 10:39 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 23:42
Posts: 3820
Dusty wrote:
ISTR a study from the states back in the 70's that found that a significant number of completly innocent people will run simply because they are being chased! these are people who, even in their own minds, have not done anything wrong!

(Like in excess of 30%!)

Police chases should only be carried out if they are attempting to apprehend people who are a known and significant real risk to other people.

Hounding people to their deaths because their paperwork is not in order is not acceptable!



But the person was asked to pull in. He chose to accelerate away at speed. We have come across some who come back after we have given up the pursuit.. just to get us to chase him again. Unfortunately, that's when they make that fatal error :roll:

Or .. you manage to successully box them in and are gently trying to bring the entire team - plus the miscreant in question - to a gentle and safe stop .. they try a "runner for it" on the last minute. :roll: Does not happen often. I think it's only happened twice over all the years.. :roll:

I do not think this chap was "hounded to his death" given the press account that he was "weaving on and off the M60"
and collided with the other car when he then left the motorway and I do not know if he was still being pursued at this stage. The article says that "at one point - 8 cars were involved - including the GMP helicopter". Maybe this biker was too fully charged with some "red mist". :roll:

No one knows which document he did not have.. or even if this bike was registered. If the bike is unregistered or reported as stolen - we usually deploy our "stealthmobiles" (to coin the :neko:'s term :wink:) to look out for these as the marked cars would be like red rags to an angry bull :roll: If the bike is not stolen and we think the RK was not legal - then if he accelerated off and it became too dangerous to US and others, we'd be inclined to head off to his home and just wait there
:bunker:

I also do not know the manner in which he accelerated away when first requested to stop for a routine check. I strongly suspect his accelerating style may have created great suspicion to the first officer. :roll:

Unless we have reason to suspect the vehicle is unroadworthy and definitely not insured - then we will give the normal 7 day producer. If the vehicle has no legal right - insurance or a plain "unroadworthy heap" - then we will tow off the vehicle and - we tend to crush "unroadworthy heaps" :bunker:

We try to nail the illegal/obviously downright dangerous drivers before they manage to do any damage to anyone here. Pursuits here are managed quite well overall - and all our teams are well aware of where they stand if they put our public at risk. We do abort many a pursuit .. but can pick up later when circumstances/condtions are safer, calmer and we have a potentially successful chance of bringing whoever/whatever to heel without anyone getting hurt. We keep it "intelligence led" :wink: and all patrols out there are working together without actually feeding someone's red mist.

The other aspect of policing when we pull someone up or even tell them we have cause to arrest them - is that officers must stay calm, polite and professionally objective at all times. Cocky manners on the part of all resolve little. :roll:

_________________
Take with a chuckle or a grain of salt
Drive without COAST and it's all your own fault!

A SMILE is a curve that sets everything straight (P Diller).

A Smiley Per post
FINES USfor our COAST!


Approach love and cooking with reckless abandon - but driving with a smile and a COAST calm mind.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 12:23 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 15:00
Posts: 1109
Location: Can't see.
In spite of my recent diminishing respect for the bib, I do not condone "calling off a dangerous pursuit". If the officers lose the target vehicle through consideration for others safety thats one thing, but to call off dangerous pursuits is to let anyone thinking of running they have a chance of escape if they can drive dangerously enough, which is not really the signal you want to send out. I daresay those who run are more likely to be in unregistered cars, or up to more serious crimes, and the ones you really NEED to stop. you cross a very significant line when you run from the police, where menial/accidental infringement becomes conscious decision to recklessly evade & break the law.

Obviously officers not following orders is a serious issue, but I fail to see how central command are in a better position to make that decision than 8 trained officers. Thinking on your feet, er wheels, is surely one of the officers most important skills.

_________________
Fear is a weapon of mass distraction


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 22:44 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 16:30
Posts: 119
So, this prat was told to stop by the Police and didn't. As a result of HIS OWN STUPIDITY he died. Well tough. I have no sympathy other than for those in any vehicle that he collided with and the suspended officers.
There are no excuses. It's simple. When told to stop by the Police, you do so. You do not do a runner, thus putting others in danger. The worlds best rid of this jackass and I hope that whoever suspended the cops from driving duties either sees the error of their ways pretty sharpish or gets sacked.
Speaking as a passionate biker who likes to live life to the full.........


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 23:47 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2008 15:50
Posts: 249
In Gear wrote:
We've halted many a pursuit .. even though the idiot biker was well in excess of the ton. We reckon we'll get him some other time soon enough..


Unfortunately, as I mentioned in a different thread tonight.. we have had some who ploughed into a rather nasty oak tree at twice the ton .. on a lethal bend... :roll:

No.. we do not use any evidence in a PR nonsense to the media. We may ask the bereaved if we can use some shock photos to deter young "red bloods" from similar outcome .. without any PR nonsense... trying to score points over whoever or whatetever :roll: We always abide by their wishes so who was to blame for what ... as this is another matter of respect.. and mutual respect will always beget mutual respect :) ..

I cannot go on anything other than Wildy's paste up from the MEN site here.

I suspect he had let the insurance lapse. Maybe it was not a week's oversight. :roll: Maybe the bike required an MOT or something put right under a HORT 1 etc ./. which he failed to comply with :roll:

How much of this spilled into red mist on both sides .. I really cannot say. :roll: :bunker:

I suspect the biker may have kept on "goading" and trying to re-kindle the pursuit after the call -off. :roll: We do get this type too. If this occurs . it is a difficult call regardless as he may still have the fatal without any action .. and if he does and the police were even nearby.. it gets the full "media twister" :roll; whichever side of the coin Wildy's "Kismet" chooses to call

:roll:

The truth will out in due course. My thoughts are with the officers who got caught up in this affair. I also have some compassion for the biker's family. They are also in mourning and it does not matter to them if he failed to renew a policy or an MOT or whatever and tried to evade justice and a fine. :roll: All they see, alas, is that their nearest and dearest died .. and the police were somehow involved :roll: Look.. they will be feeling a mix of anger against the police.. anger against the biker ... guilt if they knew he was taking some chances with his bike .. and then guilt at being angry too.

GMP will be as adept as we are at compassionate liaison... but when all is said and done.. he died when he collided with another vehicle when all that was required of him was a document check. We are aware that the database may not be up to date .

We do allow 7 days to produce all documents for most here.

. But even so .. this should not cause a grandfather to ride off and refuse to pull over at such great speed like that. It will create suspicion that there is more to this than a failure to renew VED/Insurance?MOT :roll:

The truth will come out eventually .. but so who caused what to happen ..those officers will still live with the "what if they had done X instead of Y" and the biker's family will be asking the same angry questions of their loved one's behaviour in all this.. :roll:


Indeed a sad affair .. I cannot vouch for all police officers. I can only say that our mob are not "out to get folk" and we accord polite respect even when dealing with a known criminal. To do otherwise can sink any
prosecution .. and a professional person is supposed to stay calm and collected anyway.. :popcorn:


Lot of sense in what you say and you dont appear to be the ott type.
When I look at things like this I look at the logic of it all. The end result is a dead biker....would he have died if not chased by police?
Was his level of crime so serious that it justified such police action and resources?
Was the risk of leaving the biker alone a serious risk to the public at that time?
Statistically how many bikers have killed or injured a 3rd party when being persued?
Statistically how many bikers in other circumstances have killed or injured others?
Why didnt at least one of the persuers decide this was ott behavior and excess use
of police resources and that such a large police activity in itself puts the public at
risk or in danger and break off?(that last one is a biggy to me)

If he was a known child murderer escaped from prison I would probably support the cops, but he was a rider being a little silly and challenging, not much more than that.

I may seem a little anti cop sometimes in my posts but actually Im far from that.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 09:28 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 15:30
Posts: 643
Quote:
The end result is a dead biker....would he have died if not chased by police?


We will never know that, but what is certain is that we was entirely the author of his own demise: all he had to do was stop when ordered.

It's idiots like him that have given rise to the "Speed Kills" mantra and all that follows and the rest of us now have to suffer.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 16:49 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 02:50
Posts: 2868
Location: Dorset
Maybe, with 13 grandchildren, he couldn't afford all the taxes. Maybe he couldn't afford any more points. Maybe he didn't want to risk the police stealing HIS bike and vandalising it. Maybe if the police and government stopped bullying us he would have stopped.

_________________
Andrew.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 10:25 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 16:30
Posts: 119
And maybe at 54 years old he should have known better than to outrun half the local Road Traffic Division and a Police helicopter.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 10:38 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
Ziltro wrote:
Maybe, with 13 grandchildren, he couldn't afford all the taxes. Maybe he couldn't afford any more points. Maybe he didn't want to risk the police stealing HIS bike and vandalising it. Maybe if the police and government stopped bullying us he would have stopped.



But then his own children would be earning .. or receiving benefits and tax credits to help raise these kids. :scratchchin:

I think he should have just stopped and faced whatever was wrong with the documents. Because he must have been aware that he was not 100% legal for him to have done such a runner. :roll:

_________________
If you want to get to heaven - you have to raise a little hell!

Smilies are contagious
They are just like the flu
We use our smilies on YOU today
Now Good Causes are smiling too!

KEEP SMILING
It makes folk wonder just what you REALLY got up to last night!

Smily to penny.. penny to pound
safespeed prospers-smiles all round! !

But the real message? SMILE.. GO ON ! DO IT! and the world will smile with you!
Enjoy life! You only have the one bite at it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 23:51 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
Update in yesterday's MEN

Quote:
Family's anger at death chase cops
Neal Keeling
29/ 8/2008


THE family of a biker grandad, who died after being chased for 50 minutes by eight police cars and the force plane, have called for action to be taken against the officers involved.

Alan Long, 54, was the 25th person killed in six years in incidents involving GMP vehicles.

The police control room had tried to call off the chase a number of times. Eight officers have now been suspended from driving duties.

As reported in the M.E.N, it is understood that police were trying to stop him to check his documents. His family said his 1000cc Yamaha R1 machine was taxed, insured, and had a valid MOT.

Hundreds of mourners turned up for Mr Long's funeral in Tameside.

Plane

Stepson Darren Jones, said: "The police should have backed off after about 20 minutes. The plane could have tailed him and he would still be here today.

"We don't know why he took the chase. He had paid £4,000 for the bike and had it 12 months. Just a week before this happened he spent £600 having it repaired."

Mr Long had been to Asda on August 1 when police tried to stop him in Whittles Drive near his home. He did not stop and was chased on and off the M60 through Tameside. He crashed into a car at the junction of Stamford Street and Rassbottom Street in Stalybridge.

He suffered multiple injuries and died about eight hours later. An investigation has been launched by the Independent Police Complaints Commission.

Mr Long's family have sought legal advice regarding the police pursuit and intend to make a complaint against the North West Ambulance Service

A spokesman for the service said: "We got to the scene in 21 minutes. It was a Friday night and the service was busy.

"We would be happy to talk to the family about any issues they have and we send our sincrest condolences


If only he had been a grown up and stopped when requested :roll: I honestly do not think the guy even knew why he was challenging the cops if the facts as reported are correct. :scratchchin: Moment of madness? But it seems everyone else is to blame.. apart from the man on the bike. :roll: Sorry. But that's how it still comes across. :roll:

_________________
If you want to get to heaven - you have to raise a little hell!

Smilies are contagious
They are just like the flu
We use our smilies on YOU today
Now Good Causes are smiling too!

KEEP SMILING
It makes folk wonder just what you REALLY got up to last night!

Smily to penny.. penny to pound
safespeed prospers-smiles all round! !

But the real message? SMILE.. GO ON ! DO IT! and the world will smile with you!
Enjoy life! You only have the one bite at it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 00:28 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 00:15
Posts: 5232
Location: Windermere
Taking to two wheels is a risk. Fleeing on two wheels is an even bigger risk. I think officers should be free to pursue as long as OTHER members of the public are not at risk.

Perhaps the penalty for failing to stop should be higher than it is - making it just a bit better than dying, then there might be some incentive to stop.

_________________
Time to take responsibility for our actions.. and don't be afraid of speaking out!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 20:59 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Ernest Marsh wrote:
Taking to two wheels is a risk. Fleeing on two wheels is an even bigger risk. I think officers should be free to pursue as long as OTHER members of the public are not at risk.

Perhaps the penalty for failing to stop should be higher than it is - making it just a bit better than dying, then there might be some incentive to stop.

Agreed EM.

Similar situation - armed police confront person with "weapon " (may be real or not -they do not know ) ---they request person to surrender - person replies by threating police/MOP with weapon .Police decide that lives are at risk and open fire .
Both situations demand that the rule of law is respected . In both cases it's ignored.

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 146 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.068s | 13 Queries | GZIP : Off ]