Johnnytheboy wrote:
1. Are the building societies at less risk at present than the banks, and why is that?
Yes.
They don't have to worry about their share price (since they don't have one) or paying out a dividend to shareholders. So they can concentrate on balancing the books. The problems with the HBOS had nothing to do with an actual problem with their cashflow, the merger was pushed by a drop in their share price.
A building Society would never be allowed to go bust, the FSA would force a merger as happened with the Chelsea and the Derbyshire recently (and have done many times in the past, just it rarely gets much media coverage).
In the 1990's there was a push by a small number of people to convert building societies to banks, until then a building society could only lend out money which they actually had (i.e savings and profit from mortgage interest). Most of those who remained building societies kept to that principle after the rules were relaxed.
It's no coincidence that the banks which have run into the biggest problems are converted building societies (Halifax, B&B, Northern Rock). It's easy to say "I told you so" but a lot of people saw this coming ten years ago. They had to take massive risks to grow and please the shareholders, this is coming back to bite them now.
Quote:
2. In the situation above, what would happen to me?
I'll quote some internal communication, though I probably shouldn't.
Quote:
Does the FSCS cover mortgage loans?
The FSCS does not cover mortgage loans. A borrower would still owe their outstanding mortgage balance to a bank or building society if it was wound up or went into liquidation. A borrower will still have to make monthly payments and comply with all the terms of the mortgage, as the mortgage is an asset of the institution.
However, as a general rule, the lender is entitled to "set-off" what is due to a customer on one account (usually a savings account) against what is due from that customer on another account (usually a mortgage account). Before any payment can be made to a saver under the FSCS, the FSCS takes into account what the customer owes under any mortgage to the same bank or building society.
So you could end up owing nothing or you could end up with 50k in your pocket (100k if it is a joint account) and still owing the whole amount of the mortgage (assuming the mortgage is over 50k/100k). You should contact the Nationwide to see if they have a policy in force.
But don't do anything rash, the rules are likely to change shortly anyway.