Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Thu Oct 09, 2025 09:35

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 16:10 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member

Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 15:49
Posts: 393
As a result of the 3-year accident statistics for the Wiltshire M4 enforcement being published and appearing to show a 40% reduction in accidents, Thames Valley has decided they are now going to start enforcing all the motorways in their region...


Motorway speed enforcement to cut collisions

Rising numbers of casualties and collision on the motorways has prompted the Thames Valley Safer Road Partnership to take action.

The group, made up of police, the Highways Agency and local Highway Authority partners is sending out a fleet of speed enforcement vehicles which will operate from highly visible locations on bridges over the carriageway at sites across the motorway network.

"Up until now the partnership has not run speed enforcement on free flowing unrestricted motorway," said Dan Campsall, speaking for the safer roads partnership.
"Rising casualties and evidence of the success of enforcement measures means it makes sense to introduce enforcement."

More than 1,000 people are injured on motorways in the Thames Valley each year.
Casualties rose for the fourth successive year in 2007 and are at the highest level since 2000.

Road Safety Sergeant Chris Appleby explained that mile for mile motorways are some of the safest road, but the speed people are travelling means collisions are often serious.
"Unfortunately, when it does go wrong at 80mph the consequences are devastating often resulting in lost and ruined lives,” he said.

link to article


First speed cameras on M40
9:32pm Tuesday 21st October 2008

Speed cameras were out for the first time today on the M40.

Thames Valley Safer Roads Partnership has started parking speed camera vans on bridges over the motorway in Oxfordshire.

But the roads partnership will not install signs warning drivers of the enforcement as it is too expensive.

Spokesman Dan Campsall said the signs would cost up to £25,000 each to buy and install.

The enforcement follows an increase in accidents and deaths on the M40 for the fourth successive year.

There have been five deaths and 39 serious injuries on the motorway in Oxfordshire this year alone.

Claire Benson, head of specialist units road policing, said: "We believe that as part of the overall package of road safety measures, speed enforcement will help to reverse the current trends and reduce casualties on the motorway."

Andrew Howard, head of road safety at AA, said signs should be installed to stop motorists’ claims that the safety partnership is out to fine drivers, not encourage them to slow down.

He said: "The idea should be to deter people from speeding, not to catch speeders.

"The first most people will be aware the motorway is being enforced is when fines land on their doorstep."

From tomorrow, anyone caught speeding on the M40 will face a £60 fine and three penalty points.

link to article


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 18:08 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
Quote:
Road Safety Sergeant Chris Appleby explained that mile for mile motorways are some of the safest road, but the speed people are travelling means collisions are often serious.
"Unfortunately, when it does go wrong at 80mph the consequences are devastating often resulting in lost and ruined lives,” he said.

You'd think that Sgt Appleby would realise that if it "goes wrong" at 65mph there will be devastating consequences. There in nothing magic about 70mph.
Quote:
Casualties rose for the fourth successive year in 2007 and are at the highest level since 2000.

IMO this just shows the deterioration in driving standards which is occurring. Didn't you drive at 85mph on the motorway (like everyone else) in 2000 or were you going more slowly and safely then?

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 18:54 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member

Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 15:49
Posts: 393
Motorway camera vans probably do help to prevent some accidents, by reducing the speed of the fastest 10% of drivers, who do drive too fast for their abilities and cause accidents.

But what's fairly certain is that if the speed limit was increased to 80 mph and the cameras left in place, there wouldn't magically be more accidents than at 70 -- so really, if they're going to start using cameras on motorways widely, the limit needs to be raised.

The irony about this news is that they've said that no camera warning signs will be used, which means people will brake sharply when they suddenly see an unexpected talivan -- especially out-of-town drivers just passing through who wouldn't be expecting it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 19:52 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
[quote="orange"]

unexpected talivan --quote]

FOR TALIVAN READ -"ANY VAN (OF ANY COLOUR) PARKED ON A BRIDGE ABOVE A MOTORWAY "

So - we expect to see an increase in shunt incidents- as folks break to preserve their licence,on MOTORWAYS.And possibly an increase in the distance that the scamers are operating from

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2008 18:48 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 11:46
Posts: 125
orange wrote:
Spokesman Dan Campsall said the signs would cost up to £25,000 each to buy and install.


Are they gold plated then or has the cost of aluminium really gone up by that much recently?

Mike.

_________________
www.misspelled-signs.com - A tribute to illiterate signwriters.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 09:15 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 19:50
Posts: 3369
Location: Lost in the Wilderness
Quote:
"Up until now the partnership has not run speed enforcement on free flowing unrestricted motorway," said Dan Campsall, speaking for the safer roads partnership.
"Rising casualties and evidence of the success of enforcement measures means it makes sense to introduce enforcement."


If they haven’t been enforcing on motorways then what evidence are they using to justify enforcement and, casting blame on speeding motorist.

Quote:
More than 1,000 people are injured on motorways in the Thames Valley each year.
Casualties rose for the fourth successive year in 2007 and are at the highest level since 2000.


I wonder what percentage of those 1000 peoples injuries you could have put speeding down as a facture to the accidents that the caused the injuries.

Quote:
Road Safety Sergeant Chris Appleby explained that mile for mile motorways are some of the safest road, but the speed people are travelling means collisions are often serious.
"Unfortunately, when it does go wrong at 80mph the consequences are devastating often resulting in lost and ruined lives,” he said.


So if the motorways are some of the safesest roads it can't be down to speeding motorists, it's just that when things go wrong. There’s nothing new there then, it can all go wrong anywhere on the public roads and at any speed which can end with devastating results in lost and ruined lives.

Once again they’re using their usual spiel to justify the use of speed cameras on motorways and, make people lives a further misery.

_________________
Useless laws weaken necessary laws.


Last edited by Dixie on Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:21, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:08 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 19:50
Posts: 3369
Location: Lost in the Wilderness
OK found this on Wiltshire & Swindon SCP site.

Quote:
M4 Accident Statistics - Latest Update
03 September 2008
Killed/Serious Injury (KSI) Accidents on the M4

The statistics below relate to the latest figures available – up to 30th June 2008

The Wiltshire & Swindon Safety Camera Partnership have been enforcing the speed limit on the M4 since March 2005. The figures given below provide a comparison for the period 36 months prior to commencement of enforcement and the most recent 36 months available – up to 30th June 2008.

1. At the actual camera sites our figures show a reduction of 46.66% in KSIs. However, for the whole of the Wiltshire stretch of the motorway, the following figures are available:

Period 36 months prior to enforcement - Most recent 36 months (up to 30th June 2008) - Change

Fatalities............14.....................................8...........................................Down 43%
Seriously Injured...68.....................................47..........................................Down 31%
Slightly Injured.....659...................................341..........................................Down 48%
Total.................741...................................396.........................................Down 46%

Overall therefore, the drop in KSIs (combined) for the entire length of the Wiltshire stretch of the M4 is in excess of 32.9%

There have been no engineering changes to the M4 since the cameras were commissioned and therefore it is suggested that the drop in casualties reflects solely on the effectiveness of camera enforcement on the M4 which is carried out on a daily basis, and increased driver awareness of the pitfalls of excessive speed.


We all know how they can fiddle the KSI's so that leaves the Fatalities. I wonder how many of those killed (or injured) was due to speed being the cause of the accident. The figures are also taken over a 6 year period and only run to 30th June, what happened to the rest of the year to September? I'd be interest to see a year by year breakdown of those figures. RTTM springs to mind.

Anyway we all now know what Swindon council think about "safety" cameras don't we, but then their jobs don't depend on revenue from "safety" cameras do they.

_________________
Useless laws weaken necessary laws.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:47 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
W&S strategic plan

_________________
The world runs on oil, period. No other substance can compete when it comes to energy density, flexibility, ease of handling, ease of transportation. If oil didn’t exist we would have to invent it.”

56 years after it was decided it was needed, the Bedford Bypass is nearing completion. The last single carriageway length of it.We have the most photogenic mayor though, always being photographed doing nothing


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:54 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 23:42
Posts: 3820
Mike_B wrote:
orange wrote:
Spokesman Dan Campsall said the signs would cost up to £25,000 each to buy and install.


Are they gold plated then or has the cost of aluminium really gone up by that much recently?

Mike.



Cost of labour :popcorn: to install from ordering the sign, making it and installing it. :popcorn:


Does a van work? Don't know. We do not have many problems enforcing with both unmarked and unmarked cars on our stretch of the A1(M) and folk can be tempted up to some daft speeds to be honest. :popcorn:

We manage within budget anyway. Must be doing something right then! :wink:

_________________
Take with a chuckle or a grain of salt
Drive without COAST and it's all your own fault!

A SMILE is a curve that sets everything straight (P Diller).

A Smiley Per post
FINES USfor our COAST!


Approach love and cooking with reckless abandon - but driving with a smile and a COAST calm mind.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:59 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 19:50
Posts: 3369
Location: Lost in the Wilderness
jomukuk wrote:


From the plan:

Quote:
We had made good progress from 2000 – 2005 against our targets but in the last 2 years, the overall number of those killed or seriously injured has begun to rise


Someone's telling porkies :)

_________________
Useless laws weaken necessary laws.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 14:10 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
I was interested in the variable count:

Quote:
Whilst there are fewer Killed and Seriously Injured (KSIs) at junctions than
minor accidents, junctions still account for 48% of KSIs and should be a
key strand of our policy. Night time accidents are also significant at 39%
or 22 accidents out of a total of 56 and we need to review lighting and
location in more detail. Wet roads account for 11 accidents of the 56 in
total or 20% and whilst urban roads account for the majority of accidents,
on rural roads accidents are more likely to be serious than urban roads


And:

Quote:
Currently, £420,000 is allocated to funding road safety measures in
Swindon. This is based on the main financial cost centres which includes
2 staff and the partnership contribution. However, this excludes
engineering and school crossing patrol budgets. Of this budget £320,000
is allocated to the Safety Camera Partnership. Consequently, there is
clearly a strong reliance on Safety Cameras to deliver a reduction in KSI
accidents and given the data from DfT on speed related accidents and
that from TRL on accidents in Swindon, such a reliance on one facet of
road safety is disproportionate


And when this report disappears, as it will, I have it saved !

_________________
The world runs on oil, period. No other substance can compete when it comes to energy density, flexibility, ease of handling, ease of transportation. If oil didn’t exist we would have to invent it.”

56 years after it was decided it was needed, the Bedford Bypass is nearing completion. The last single carriageway length of it.We have the most photogenic mayor though, always being photographed doing nothing


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 14:40 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
ABD PR 449 is a bit old now but contains some interesting data. If very few KSIs were caused by speeding, why would the cameras improve matters so much?

http://www.abd.org.uk/pr/449.htm

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 16:49 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 20:54
Posts: 225
Location: West Midlands
If a single sign costs £25,000, then just how much is it costing to put up those pointless signs every half a kilometre (humm, metric, i wonder who mandated them?) on our motorways telling us how far we are from their "start"?????

And not just motorways - A-roads as well (e.g. the A38).

mb


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 17:18 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:30
Posts: 2053
Location: South Wales (Roving all UK)
Call me cynical but if other local authorities follow the lead of Swindon then funding for the SCP industry will need to be found elsewhere. Cue, The HIghways Agency, direct government funding, no fear of elected representatives making the wrong decision.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 19:21 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
civil engineer wrote:
Call me cynical but if other local authorities follow the lead of Swindon then funding for the SCP industry will need to be found elsewhere. Cue, The HIghways Agency, direct government funding, no fear of elected representatives making the wrong decision.

#
Well :scratchchin: NHS Trusts are part of this pratnership. I would love the cash allocation donated on behalf of NHS be spent on NHS instead :roll:


Amount paid on behalf of police would also buy us a few more officers too.

Disband the SCPS and go back to the tried and tested :wink:

_________________
If you want to get to heaven - you have to raise a little hell!

Smilies are contagious
They are just like the flu
We use our smilies on YOU today
Now Good Causes are smiling too!

KEEP SMILING
It makes folk wonder just what you REALLY got up to last night!

Smily to penny.. penny to pound
safespeed prospers-smiles all round! !

But the real message? SMILE.. GO ON ! DO IT! and the world will smile with you!
Enjoy life! You only have the one bite at it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 19:28 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 04:10
Posts: 3244
But where would all the staff find work ?
Are there any jobs for under qualified sadists ?
On the good side, the mags courts would be no longer be part of the scam.....

_________________
The world runs on oil, period. No other substance can compete when it comes to energy density, flexibility, ease of handling, ease of transportation. If oil didn’t exist we would have to invent it.”

56 years after it was decided it was needed, the Bedford Bypass is nearing completion. The last single carriageway length of it.We have the most photogenic mayor though, always being photographed doing nothing


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.025s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]