Mole wrote:
I'd be REALLY wary of tables like that! You could probably put together a good case for saying that you were more likely to get killed in a navy blue Mondeo (or whatever the most popular car is) than a TVR using the "right" sort of statistical analysis!
yes, the tables were first posted to another forum by someone wishing to show how a pious was "safer" than a s-class, I posted this:
http://www.iihs.org/research/hldi/compo ... 2007&cls=4which show how 'vette, mustang, 911 and 350z rag tops are all "safer places" to be than their tin top counterparts.
Of course thats rubbish, they're better
insurance risks, which is dependent of the average driver of a class of car. Although you can't cherry pick the bits that support your pre-selected ideal (where have we seen that before?), it shows that patterns emerge that go beyond simplistic assumptions ie more car=safer.