Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sun Jun 21, 2026 00:38

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jan 25, 2009 02:28 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 21:51
Posts: 293
Is it just me or has anyone else noticed that there is more traffic when it rains?

I’ve noticed that it's a peculiarly British phenomena and have never noticed it in places like Saudi Arabia. The additional traffic can cause major slow downs on motorways in wet weather. In it's own way, this is a good thing. Wet roads are more dangerous and the extra cars and decrease in speeds actually save lives.

I did a scientific test and my average journey time from home to work on a dry day is thirty five minutes, but in wet weather, this rockets to fifty minutes, nearly trebling my average journey time.

Where do the extra cars come from?

It must be that we Brits like driving in the rain so much that as soon as the heavens open, we're all in our cars driving. Of course, it could be that we just don't want to stand at a wet bus stop.

The other theory that has been doing the rounds is that it's a government safety scheme. When it rains, they send out their trucks to congest the roads, and slow people down.

I did try phoning the Roads Minister, but he wasn’t available, but when I explained my theories to the nice young girl who answered the phone, she said I was talking “bollocks”.

What do you think? Have your say here.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 25, 2009 05:18 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 12:01
Posts: 4815
Location: Essex
I call these folk wet whether drivers :)

People living perhaps up to 5 miles from work may choose typically to cycle or motor-cycle to work, yet come the rain they'll dive for their car.

People living a mile or less may cycle or walk - but come the rain they dive for their car.

People who live 1 - 2 miles from a station who ordinarily walk to the station... dive for their car and drive all the way to work not to the station.

People who get the train/bus ordinarily and then have a 1-2 mile walk at the other end... dive to their car and drive all the way when it rains.

Kids who ordinarily walk to school con mothers and older siblings into dropping them off when it rains...

And of course all these wet weather drivers are low mileage, more cautious people - and a road is only as fast as the one in the front of the queue. And even regular drivers respect the greater stopping distance and poorer visibility...


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 25, 2009 08:58 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 22:50
Posts: 3267
Lucy W wrote:
decrease in speeds actually save lives.



Cor, don't say that on here!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 25, 2009 10:31 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 13:03
Posts: 685
It must have something to do with perceived danger and common sense. Traffic is slower in wet weather as it is near schools in the main. It makes me cringe when people say they would support speed camera outside scools when there is no great problem of speeding motorists plowing down school children.
Schools in my experience seem to be self regulating. Yes child casualties occur there but this would be by virtue of the concentration of the childlike animal would it not? Suggest a camera there and you must acknoledge they would be beneficial; self defeating for safespeed I suggest!
The culture in Saudi would remove self regulation in that country.
The greatest number of injuries occur in fine weather, less in poor weather and in areas of perceived danger, perhaps as has been noticed because traffic speeds are reduced.
Has this suggestion hit the nail on the head with a self defeating theory for SS?
By the way, I have to agree with the roads ministers secretary, a suggestion that DfT baulking trucks are sent out in poor weather is as she described.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:00 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 22:02
Posts: 3266
I have to agree that a speed camera out side a school would be a folly. You can't put a number on a safespeed past a school because the risk is allways changing . The road may be wide and streight and 40mph limit would be sensible out of hours. During class times you might concider 30mph and pickup time 20 or even 10mph could be dangerous. A speed camera outside a school could only hope to catch drivers who are driving past safely out of hours and let the dangerous ones escape ploughing through under the posted limit yes still dangerously. You cannot decide on a 20 limit outside all schools as schools are in such varied locations and risks.

_________________
Speed limit sign radio interview. TV Snap Unhappy
“It has never been the rule in this country – I hope it never will be - that suspected criminal offences must automatically be the subject of prosecution” He added that there should be a prosecution: “wherever it appears that the offence or the circumstances of its commission is or are of such a character that a prosecution in respect thereof is required in the public interest”
This approach has been endorsed by Attorney General ever since 1951. CPS Code


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:03 
Offline
Supporter
Supporter
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 13:45
Posts: 4042
Location: Near Buxton, Derbyshire
Edited, at Roger's request, to remove humour. :fastasleep:

_________________
When I see an adult on a bicycle, I do not despair for the future of the human race. H.G. Wells
When I see a youth in a motor car I do d.c.brown


Last edited by dcbwhaley on Sun Jan 25, 2009 13:18, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:33 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 18:54
Posts: 4036
Location: Cumbria
You ought to retire to somewhere rural! SRB staff get a free caravan there! :wink:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:34 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 12:01
Posts: 4815
Location: Essex
DCBH wrote:
I have enlisted as a member of the Speed Regulation Brigade. There are two classes of membership. Basic requires you to commit to two hours per day of driving at 25mph on the busiest roads within reasonable distance of your home. Brigade engineers fit the regulator to your car and provide you with a suitable hat.


Could you please enlighten us more of this scheme? If it is real, which I doubt, I'd love to know more. If it isn't, may I remind that this is the "serious" section of the board, and that your post would serve only to inflame things, and I would invite you to remove it, or edit it be a wish rather than present it as fact.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:39 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 19:08
Posts: 3434
Quote:
dcbwhaley on Sun Jan 25, 2009 10:03 am




You are on the right track. I am retiring shortly and to supplement my income I have enlisted as a member of the Speed Regulation Brigade. There are two classes of membership. Basic requires you to commit to two hours per day of driving at 25mph on the busiest roads within reasonable distance of your home. Brigade engineers fit the regulator to your car and provide you with a suitable hat.

Advanced membership requires you to have radio equipment fitted to the car. Your task then is to sit in your car on a side road to a not very busy NSL road. When the Brigade satellite spots a motorists travelling at or near the speed limit it transmits instruction to you to pull out in front of, travel for at least 100 meters at 25mph then turn off again without signalling

It is a nice little earner and a major contribution to road safety




Wow, you can get paid for that?..... I always thought that these people did it for free!......;-)

_________________
My views do not represent Safespeed but those of a driver who has driven for 39 yrs, in all conditions, at all times of the day & night on every type of road and covered well over a million miles, so knows a bit about what makes for safety on the road,what is really dangerous and needs to be observed when driving and quite frankly, the speedo is way down on my list of things to observe to negotiate Britain's roads safely, but I don't expect some fool who sits behind a desk all day to appreciate that.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 25, 2009 12:39 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 13:00
Posts: 919
Lucy W wrote:
Where do the extra cars come from?


Rain causes crashes, which slows everything down a lot, because the coppers make such a big fuss.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 25, 2009 12:52 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 19:08
Posts: 3434
rain causes crashes....surely only SPEED causes crashes.....;-)

_________________
My views do not represent Safespeed but those of a driver who has driven for 39 yrs, in all conditions, at all times of the day & night on every type of road and covered well over a million miles, so knows a bit about what makes for safety on the road,what is really dangerous and needs to be observed when driving and quite frankly, the speedo is way down on my list of things to observe to negotiate Britain's roads safely, but I don't expect some fool who sits behind a desk all day to appreciate that.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 25, 2009 13:15 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 18:50
Posts: 673
roger wrote:
Could you please enlighten us more of this scheme? If it is real, which I doubt, I'd love to know more. If it isn't, may I remind that this is the "serious" section of the board, and that your post would serve only to inflame things, and I would invite you to remove it, or edit it be a wish rather than present it as fact.


I am sure his quote is tongue in cheek, however I am sure I am right in thinking that there were moves not so long ago to get a group of motorists together who would pledge to always drive below the speed limit in order to slow down other motorists. I am unable to find any links to it now, but I am sure I didn't dream it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 25, 2009 13:24 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
Yeah, they ditched this idea when their neighbours said they would check their dustbins every week to see if they had mixed up recyclables with other waste. :)

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 25, 2009 13:26 
Offline
Supporter
Supporter
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 13:45
Posts: 4042
Location: Near Buxton, Derbyshire
malcolmw wrote:
Yeah, they ditched this idea when their neighbours said they would check their dustbins every week to see if they had mixed up recyclables with other waste. :)


May I remind that this is the "serious" section of the board, and that your post would serve only to inflame things, and I would invite you to remove it, or edit it be a wish rather than present it as fact.

_________________
When I see an adult on a bicycle, I do not despair for the future of the human race. H.G. Wells
When I see a youth in a motor car I do d.c.brown


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 25, 2009 13:39 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 13:03
Posts: 685
anton wrote:
I have to agree that a speed camera out side a school would be a folly. You can't put a number on a safespeed past a school because the risk is allways changing . The road may be wide and streight and 40mph limit would be sensible out of hours. During class times you might concider 30mph and pickup time 20 or even 10mph could be dangerous. A speed camera outside a school could only hope to catch drivers who are driving past safely out of hours and let the dangerous ones escape ploughing through under the posted limit yes still dangerously. You cannot decide on a 20 limit outside all schools as schools are in such varied locations and risks.

You can and they do.
Are you advocating variable speed limits in your post?
What would your alternative to a slower limit be?
The flashing school signs should, in reasonable drivers, be a signal to be aware of impending danger of school children appearing suddenly; this is the self regulating effect I explaned above. Is there a need for a lower limit or a variable limit?
Maybe a flashing school sign should be made to indicate a maximum speed when activated; in a 40 mph speed limit (or any speed limit for that matter ) it means 20 mph maximum. This will help those who find it difficlt to self-regulate. Maybe I am using the term "self regulate" as an alternative for knowing how to drive!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 25, 2009 13:50 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 22:02
Posts: 3266
Quite simply to use the existing laws and proper policing.
1. Strict enfocement of parking around school gates
2. Schools to enforce thier own transport plans.
3 Police to prosicute dangerous drivers, parkers etc using existing laws. Sign schools better using exising schols and school patroll crossing signs rather than stupid 20s pleanty signs.
4. Yes I would agree with a variable speed limit for 1 hour around entry exit times "when lights flash" rather than rediculous 24/7 20 limits all year round. Although solving 1,2&3 would be preferable.

_________________
Speed limit sign radio interview. TV Snap Unhappy
“It has never been the rule in this country – I hope it never will be - that suspected criminal offences must automatically be the subject of prosecution” He added that there should be a prosecution: “wherever it appears that the offence or the circumstances of its commission is or are of such a character that a prosecution in respect thereof is required in the public interest”
This approach has been endorsed by Attorney General ever since 1951. CPS Code


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 25, 2009 13:52 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 12:01
Posts: 4815
Location: Essex
Oh dear - I don't mind humour ... but it's useful to include a winky to confirm that posts are "asides". It was presented so "well" that I could see it develoiping in to a series of flames..

Sorry if I over-reacted.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 25, 2009 14:26 
Offline
Supporter
Supporter
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 13:45
Posts: 4042
Location: Near Buxton, Derbyshire
Roger wrote:
Oh dear - I don't mind humour ... but it's useful to include a winky to confirm that posts are "asides". It was presented so "well" that I could see it develoiping in to a series of flames..

Sorry if I over-reacted.


Apology accepted and reciprocated :bighand: But we do need that "tongue in cheek" emoticon :D

_________________
When I see an adult on a bicycle, I do not despair for the future of the human race. H.G. Wells
When I see a youth in a motor car I do d.c.brown


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 25, 2009 15:15 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2004 14:47
Posts: 1659
Location: A Dark Desert Highway
unless you did a series of traffic surveys you wouldn't know if there was more traffic. What almost certainly happens is that people adjust their driving for the conditions :o and increase their following distance to keep out of the spray and slow down a bit. So as journey times are longer, there are more cars on the road at a given time. Much like when it snows everything grinds to a halt. The roads are at capacity and the slightest thing causes everything to slow down.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 25, 2009 15:24 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 19:08
Posts: 3434
I had an "argument" with a "bright spark" from our council planning dept a year or so ago. She insisted that reducing all NSL roads in the area to 40MPH or less, would reduce congestion. She had obviously never followed a tractor in her life!

_________________
My views do not represent Safespeed but those of a driver who has driven for 39 yrs, in all conditions, at all times of the day & night on every type of road and covered well over a million miles, so knows a bit about what makes for safety on the road,what is really dangerous and needs to be observed when driving and quite frankly, the speedo is way down on my list of things to observe to negotiate Britain's roads safely, but I don't expect some fool who sits behind a desk all day to appreciate that.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.048s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]