Having spent a few years working as H&S Manager, for companies large and small, I can understand the cynism shown to risk-assesments.
I always understood that the principle was to use any assesment to find a better methodology which also reduces the risk. Simultaneously harnessing the knowledge, skills and contribution of the person(s) most familiar with the task assessed. I can count on the fingers of one hand the examples of tangible success, and they weren't judged solely on accidents'-reduction.
I always found that losses-realisation/cost-management of a 'suspect process', for those holding the purse-strings, gave real momentum to change, and a win-win for all involved. Trouble is the title H&S Manager, whose role can directly encroach

upon the authority and territory of other Managers in the organisation.
I also managed HACCP (hazard analysis critical control point) for a major dairy. The related risk-assesments for food quality ain't that much different to those performed for occupational-safety purposes.......but boy-oh-boy are the results regarded with far more interest and commitment.
Funny old world, ain't it?